How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
On an interval , for continuous on and differentiable at every interior point: throughout gives nondecreasing, gives increasing, and give the two decreasing forms; conversely a nondecreasing has and a nonincreasing has wherever it is differentiable, and no strict converse is claimed
Statement
Let be order-convex (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), let be continuous on (Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point) and differentiable at every point of interior to (Interior, closure, boundary and exterior of a subset of , The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set). The words nondecreasing, increasing, nonincreasing and decreasing are those of Nondecreasing, increasing (strictly increasing), nonincreasing, decreasing, monotone and strictly monotone real functions on a subset of , with the dictionary to monotone sequences, in which increasing is the strict notion.
- If at every interior point of , then is nondecreasing on .
- If at every interior point of , then is increasing on .
- If at every interior point of , then is nonincreasing on .
- If at every interior point of , then is decreasing on .
Conversely, with no continuity hypothesis and no hypothesis at any other point:
- If is nondecreasing on and differentiable at a point that is a limit point of , then ; if is nonincreasing and differentiable at such a , then .
No strict converse is claimed here, and none is true. Claim 5 gives the weak inequality only, and it cannot be improved: an increasing function may have a vanishing derivative at a point. That failure is recorded separately, as a false statement later on this page, with its witness worked out on the companion page. Reading claim 2 backwards is the single most common misuse of this theorem, and this statement does not license it.
Claims 1 to 4 need the interval; claim 5 does not. The forward direction runs through the mean value theorem on a segment joining two points of , so order-convexity is essential. Claim 5 is a statement about one point and uses only that the difference quotients have a constant sign.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An order-convex and a function ; for claims 1 to 4 also that is continuous on and differentiable at every interior point of , with the stated sign condition; for claim 5 that is monotone on and differentiable at a limit point of .
Mean value theorem (The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with ): for and continuous on and differentiable at every point of , there is with .
Order-convexity (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length): with gives ; and for in every is interior to , since for (The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of , Interior, closure, boundary and exterior of a subset of ).
Difference quotient and restriction of the domain (The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set): differentiability of at means that on has limit ; if , if is a limit point of and if is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with the same derivative; and every point of an order-convex set with at least two elements is a limit point of it (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of ).
Continuity passes to a subset of the domain (Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).
Monotone vocabulary (Nondecreasing, increasing (strictly increasing), nonincreasing, decreasing, monotone and strictly monotone real functions on a subset of , with the dictionary to monotone sequences): is nondecreasing on when for all with ; increasing when for all ; nonincreasing and decreasing are the two conditions with the inequalities on the values reversed.
Order arithmetic (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order, Ordered field): for reals and with , gives , gives and gives , so by trichotomy gives and gives ; a nonzero real and its inverse have the same sign, so a quotient with and , or with and , is , and a quotient with and , or with and , is .
Limits preserve the non-strict order (If on a punctured neighbourhood of then , non-strictly): if are functions on a set having as a limit point, if both limits at exist and if at every with for some real , then . The constant function on has limit at (The - limit of at a limit point of ).
Proof
If has at most one element then all four of the conditions in [L5] hold on vacuously or trivially, since there is no pair in , and claims 1 to 4 are immediate. So assume has at least two elements, and let with be arbitrary.
Claim 5. Let be nondecreasing on and differentiable at a limit point of , and let on , so by [L3]. For with one has by [L5], so the numerator is while the denominator is , and [L6] gives . For with one has , so the numerator is while , and [L6] again gives . So the constant function is at every point of , in particular at every such point with ; both functions have limits at the limit point of , namely and , so [L7] gives . The nonincreasing case is the same argument with both inequalities on the values reversed, which makes throughout and hence .
By [L2] the segment is contained in and is nondegenerate. The restriction is continuous on by [L4]; and for the point is interior to by [L2], so is differentiable at , while is a limit point of by [L3], so is differentiable at with .
By step 2.1 the function satisfies the hypotheses of [L1] on , so fix with ; and since .
If at every interior point of then in particular , so by [L6], that is . If at every interior point then and the same product is , that is .
If at every interior point then and by [L6], that is . If at every interior point then and , that is .
The pair in was arbitrary, so steps 4.1 and 4.2 establish exactly the four conditions of [L5]: for the two non-strict ones the case is the trivial equality , and the two strict ones are conditions on pairs only. Claims 1 to 4 are proved.
Claims 1 to 4 are step 5.1 and claim 5 is step 1.2.
Remarks
-
The forward direction is one application of the mean value theorem, and nothing more. The sign of at the single point the theorem produces is what decides the sign of the increment; no information about anywhere else is used in a given comparison, and the hypothesis is imposed at every interior point only because the point produced cannot be located in advance.
-
Claim 5 is genuinely weaker than the converse of claim 2, and that is not a defect of the proof. If on a punctured neighbourhood of then , non-strictly destroys strictness in the limit, and no argument can restore it here, because the conclusion is false: an increasing function may have a vanishing derivative. The false statement recording that, and its witness on the companion page, are the honest form of what a reader is tempted to write.
-
What a vanishing derivative at every interior point gives is the case and together, hence nondecreasing and nonincreasing, hence constant. That is A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant, proved directly above rather than deduced here, since the direct proof is shorter.
Depends on
- The mean value theorem, as the case $g(x) = x$ of Cauchy's: for $f$ continuous on $[a,b]$ with $a < b$ and differentiable on $(a,b)$ there is $c \in (a,b)$ with $f(b) - f(a) = f'(c)(b-a)$
- The derivative $f'(c) = \lim_{x \to c} \frac{f(x) - f(c)}{x - c}$ of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a point $c \in A$ that is a limit point of $A$, and differentiability on a set
- Nondecreasing, increasing (strictly increasing), nonincreasing, decreasing, monotone and strictly monotone real functions on a subset of $\mathbb{R}$, with the dictionary to monotone sequences
- Intervals of $\mathbb{R}$: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
- Continuity of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a point of $A$ and on $A$: the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ condition, its agreement with $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c)$ at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
- If $f \le g$ on a punctured neighbourhood of $c$ then $\lim f \le \lim g$, non-strictly
- The $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ limit $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L$ of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a limit point $c$ of $A$
- Interior, closure, boundary and exterior of a subset of $\mathbb{R}$
- Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication
- Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order
- Ordered field
- The $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood and the punctured $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood of a point of $\mathbb{R}$
- Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of $\mathbb{R}$
Used by
- A twice-differentiable function on an open interval is convex if and only if its second derivative is nonnegative Corollary
- x ↦ x³ is increasing on ℝ although its derivative vanishes at 0, which is the witness for the false statement that a vanishing derivative forbids strict increase, and which makes its inverse non-differentiable at 0 Example
- FALSE: if f'(c) = 0 then f is not increasing on any interval containing c False statement
- Tangent is a continuous strictly increasing bijection from (-π/2,π/2) onto ℝ Lemma
- A differentiable function on an open interval is convex if and only if its derivative is nondecreasing Theorem
- The second-derivative test for strict local extrema Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 58 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Monotonic function (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mean value theorem (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 5 (Thm 5.11) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, Mean Value Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Hunter, An Introduction to Real Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)