How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An -narrow graph contains a perfect induced subgraph of order at least
Statement
Let be a nonempty finite graph and let . If is -narrow, then it has a perfect induced subgraph of order at least .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty finite graph and a real number .
A graph is -narrow when every good function satisfies (An -narrow graph).
A good function has weight at most on every perfect induced subgraph (A good function on a graph, A perfect graph).
For every real , the function is increasing on : its derivative is , the factor is positive for because real powers are defined through and is positive, and the derivative-sign theorem then gives monotonicity (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers, Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention, The exponential is positive and satisfies , On an interval , for continuous on and differentiable at every interior point: throughout gives nondecreasing, gives increasing, and give the two decreasing forms; conversely a nondecreasing has and a nonincreasing has wherever it is differentiable, and no strict converse is claimed).
Real powers use the notation for positive (Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention).
Proof
Let be the maximum order of a perfect induced subgraph of . Since is nonempty, every one-vertex induced subgraph is perfect, so . Define for every . If is a perfect induced subgraph of , then , so . Thus is good by [F2].
If is -narrow, [F1] applied to the good function of step 1.1 yields . Therefore . Since and , both sides are positive, so applying [L1] with exponent and then using [L2] gives .
By definition of , there is a perfect induced subgraph of order , and step 2.1 gives .
Depends on
- An $\alpha$-narrow graph
- A good function on a graph
- A perfect graph
- Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention
- The exponent, product, quotient, and iterated-power laws for positive real bases and real exponents
- Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers
- On an interval $I$, for $f$ continuous on $I$ and differentiable at every interior point: $f' \ge 0$ throughout gives $f$ nondecreasing, $f' > 0$ gives $f$ increasing, $f' \le 0$ and $f' < 0$ give the two decreasing forms; conversely a nondecreasing $f$ has $f' \ge 0$ and a nonincreasing $f$ has $f' \le 0$ wherever it is differentiable, and no strict converse is claimed
- The exponential is positive and satisfies $\exp(-x)=1/\exp(x)$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Maria Chudnovsky and Shmuel Safra, The Erdős-Hajnal conjecture for bull-free graphs, Section 2 (standard reference, not scraped)