How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Banach Valued Integration and the Radon Nikodym Property
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Absolute Continuity and the Sharp Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
- Approximation and Compactness in C(K)
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach Alaoglu Goldstine and Krein Milman
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Complete Metrizability, Čech-Completeness, and Baire Category
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Convergence: Nets and Filters
- Convex and Semicontinuous Functions on Rⁿ
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Differentiation of Monotone Functions and the Vitali Covering Theorem
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces Adjoint Operators and Annihilators
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Geometric Hahn Banach and Convex Separation
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Reflexivity and Eberlein Smulian
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Sequential Uniform Boundedness with Countable Choice
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Analytic Hahn Banach Theorem
- The Baire Principles of Functional Analysis
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Duality of Lᵖ and L^q
- The Exponential Function
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Radon Nikodym Theorem and Lebesgue Decomposition
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Weak and Weak Star Topologies
2 · Summary
The Bochner integral is built from finite Banach-valued simple functions with the zero-times-infinity convention made explicit and representation independence proved before use. Strong measurability, the Pettis criterion, the integrability criterion, norm inequality, dominated convergence, and commutation with bounded linear maps then provide the working integration theory. Countable Choice or full AC is stated only where the selected approximants or Hahn--Banach argument actually require it; the elementary AC-to-sequential-choice implication is proved locally before its consumers.
Vector measures are treated separately from their scalar variations. A Bochner density produces an absolutely continuous vector measure with the exact variation density, while dentability supplies the geometric characterization of Banach targets with the Radon--Nikodym property. The separable-determination and Lebesgue-interval reductions expose the finite-branching martingale construction instead of hiding it behind the characterization.
The interval-measure correspondence gives the Lipschitz differentiability criterion. It yields RNP for separable duals, Hilbert spaces, and reflexive spaces, and gives explicit failures for and nonatomic . The closing Dunford--Pettis theorem characterizes relatively weakly compact subsets of real on finite measure spaces by uniform integrability, with AC propagated through its Baire, compactness, and duality inputs.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Banach-valued simple function and integral
Definition
Let be a measure space and let be a real or complex Banach space. An -valued measurable simple function is a function having a representation
where , the sets are pairwise disjoint, and the vectors are distinct and nonzero. The value of off is . The empty representation is therefore the zero function.
The simple function is integrable when for every nonzero coefficient . Its integral over is
In particular, means . Requiring finite measure only for the nonzero level sets avoids the undefined product . The next lemma proves that the displayed value does not depend on the chosen disjoint representation.
Remarks
- The canonical representation uses the nonzero fibres . Thus repetitions may always be merged and an explicit zero fibre may be discarded.
- When , every displayed sum is empty and the integral is .
The Banach-valued simple integral is well defined
Statement
The integral of an integrable Banach-valued simple function is independent of its disjoint measurable representation. It is linear, is unchanged when the integrand is changed on a null set, and satisfies
for every measurable .
Facts & Assumptions
An integrable -valued simple function and its proposed integral are as in Banach-valued simple function and integral.
A measure is countably, hence finitely, additive on disjoint measurable families and assigns measure zero to the empty set (Measures on sigma-algebras).
The nonnegative simple integral is the coefficient--measure sum, with (The integral of a nonnegative simple function).
Proof
Given: Integrable simple functions on a measure space with values in a Banach space, as in the Statement.
Form a finite common refinement. [given, L1] Suppose are two representations from [L1]. Because every displayed coefficient is nonzero, both unions and are the same set . Hence the cells with and partition every and every . On every nonempty , pointwise equality gives .
Compare the two integral sums. By finite additivity in [L2], step 1.1 gives
Every lies in the finite-measure cells and , so every scalar-vector product in this display is defined. No complement cell and no convention is used. This proves representation independence.
Prove linearity. [L1, step 2.1] For integrable and scalars , refine their finite level partitions. On each refined cell has coefficient . Every cell on which this coefficient is nonzero lies in the union of the finite-measure supports of and , so is integrable. Applying step 2.1 and distributing the finite vector sum yields .
Prove null-insensitivity. [L2, step 3.1] If integrable simple functions agree off a null set , refine their level partitions as above. A refined cell on which their coefficients differ is contained in , hence has measure zero by [L2]. Its contribution to is zero, and linearity from step 3.1 gives .
Prove the norm inequality and conclude. [L1, L3, step 4.1] Write in its nonzero disjoint-level form. The triangle inequality in , [L3], and the finite-measure support rule give
This also covers the empty representation and : both sides are zero. ∎
Strongly measurable Banach-valued function
Definition
Let be a measure space and a real or complex Banach space. A function is strongly measurable (or Bochner measurable) if there are measurable -valued simple functions and a measurable null set such that
for every .
This is a norm-convergence condition. It is not, by definition, merely Borel measurability of or measurability of every scalar function . Changing on a null set preserves strong measurability: enlarge by that null set and retain the same approximants.
Remarks
- The zero function is strongly measurable, witnessed by the constant zero simple sequence.
- A single measurable simple function is strongly measurable, witnessed by the constant sequence and .
Pettis measurability criterion for strong measurability
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, let be a complete measure space, and let be a real or complex Banach space. A function is strongly measurable if and only if both conditions hold:
- is weakly measurable: is scalar measurable for every ;
- is essentially separably valued: there are a null set and a separable closed subspace such that .
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).
Strong measurability is a.e. pointwise norm approximation by measurable simple functions (Strongly measurable Banach-valued function).
The dual consists of bounded scalar-valued linear functionals (The dual space X^* of a normed space and its dual norm).
On a complete measure space, every subset of a measurable null set is measurable (Complete measure spaces), and measurability means that Borel preimages are measurable (A measurable function between measurable spaces).
Separability means existence of an at most countable dense subset (Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset).
Under AC, a dominated real linear functional extends to the whole real space (Hahn-Banach dominated extension theorem for real vector spaces).
Proof
Given: The assumptions and the two conditions in the Statement.
Strong measurability gives an essentially separable range. [given, L1, L4] Assume first that is strongly measurable, witnessed by and as in [L1]. The union of the finite ranges of the is countable. Its closed linear span is separable by [L4], and every with is a norm limit of points of . Thus is essentially separably valued.
Strong measurability gives weak measurability. [given, L1, L2, L3] For , [L2] gives off . Each is scalar simple and measurable. A pointwise scalar limit is measurable off , and [L3] makes its arbitrary values on subsets of measurable as well. Hence is weakly measurable.
Fix countable dense data for the reverse implication. [given, L4, choose] Conversely assume conditions 1 and 2. If , the constant zero simple functions converge to off , so suppose . By [L4] choose a sequence dense in and a sequence dense in its unit sphere.
Construct a countable norming family. [A1, L2, L5, step 1.3] For each , in the complex case define on the underlying real plane the norm-one real functional ; in the real case use on . Apply [L5] and [A1] to extend these simultaneously to real functionals on the underlying real space of . In the complex case put ; in the real case put . Then , , and . Consequently, for ,
Indeed the upper bound is immediate, while a unit vector arbitrarily close to some makes the corresponding value arbitrarily close to .
Norm distances to fixed centres are measurable. [L3, step 2.1] For fixed , step 2.1 and weak measurability give, off , . The right side is the supremum of a countable family of measurable scalar functions. With any values assigned on , [L3] therefore makes measurable.
Build finite-valued nearest-centre approximants. [L1, step 1.3, step 3.1] For each and , choose the least minimizing ; put there and on . The finitely many tie-broken Voronoi cells are measurable by step 3.1, so is a measurable simple function. Density of gives for every .
Steps 1.1--1.2 prove the forward implication, and step 4.1 supplies the simple approximants required by [L1] for the reverse implication. The only non-finite choice is [A1]: it supplies the Hahn--Banach extensions in step 2.1 (and hence also covers their countable simultaneous selection).
Bochner-integrable function
Definition
Let be a measure space and a real or complex Banach space. A strongly measurable function is Bochner integrable if there is a sequence of integrable -valued simple functions such that
For such a sequence define
The displayed norm limit exists: the simple integral inequality gives
so the simple integrals form a Cauchy sequence, and is complete. The next theorem proves that the value is independent of the approximating sequence and characterizes existence by integrability of .
For , write whenever this function is Bochner integrable.
Remarks
The zero function and every integrable simple function are Bochner integrable, witnessed by constant approximating sequences. No choice principle is used in this definition or in the Cauchy estimate.
Bochner integrability criterion
Statement
Let be strongly measurable. Then is Bochner integrable if and only if
Here an a.e.-defined scalar function is integrated through any measurable representative supplied by the strong simple approximation. Moreover the Bochner integral is independent of the approximating sequence in its definition.
Facts & Assumptions
Bochner integrability means approximation by integrable simple functions and defines the integral as the norm limit of their integrals (Bochner-integrable function).
Nonnegative integrals are monotone and positively homogeneous (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral) and additive (Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral).
Pointwise limits and countable suprema of measurable scalar functions are measurable (Sequential suprema, infima, limsup, liminf, and pointwise limits of measurable functions are measurable).
Scalar dominated convergence gives convergence in (Dominated convergence); its nonnegative foundation is monotone convergence (Monotone convergence for the integral).
Proof
Given: A strongly measurable and the conventions in the Statement.
Prove necessity of scalar norm integrability. [given, L1, L2] Suppose first that is Bochner integrable and choose as in [L1]. For some , , while integrability of the simple function gives . Since , [L2] gives .
Prove approximation independence. [given, L1] If and are any two defining approximations, the simple norm inequality gives , which is at most . Both terms tend to zero, so the two norm limits coincide.
Construct dominated simple approximants for sufficiency. [given, L3, construct] Conversely assume . On the exceptional measurable null set of a strong approximation, replace both and every approximant by zero (and call the representative again ). Thus measurable simple functions converge pointwise to ; [L3] makes measurable. Define . Then is simple and measurable, , and pointwise: when , the inequality defining the retained part holds eventually, while at a zero of either retained values tend to zero or the replacement is zero.
Verify that the constructed simple functions are integrable. [L2, step 1.3] Each is integrable. Indeed, if a nonzero value occurs, its level set is contained in , whose measure is at most by [L2].
Obtain convergence in . [L1, L4, step 1.3, step 2.1] The pointwise convergence in step 1.3 and allow [L4] to be applied. Hence . Together with step 2.1 this is exactly the approximation required in [L1].
Step 1.1 proves necessity, step 3.1 proves sufficiency, and step 1.2 proves that the resulting integral is approximation-independent. The zero function, the empty measure space, and a single simple function are included by taking the constant zero or constant simple approximation.
Bochner integral norm inequality
Statement
If is Bochner integrable, then for every measurable ,
Facts & Assumptions
For a strongly measurable function, Bochner integrability is equivalent to finite integrability of its norm. Every Bochner-integrable function has a defining integrable-simple approximation converging in (Bochner integrability criterion).
The inequality holds for integrable Banach-valued simple functions (The Banach-valued simple integral is well defined).
The nonnegative integral is additive (Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral) and monotone (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
Proof
Given: A Bochner-integrable and a measurable set .
Restrict a defining simple approximation to . [given, L1, choose] Choose integrable simple with . Replacing each by shows from [L1] that is Bochner integrable and that its integral is the norm limit of .
Bound each simple integral. [L2, L3, step 1.1] The triangle inequality and [L2] give . Since , [L3] yields .
Pass to the limit and conclude. [step 1.1, step 2.1] Let in step 2.1. Norm continuity and step 1.1 identify the left limit with , while the last term tends to zero. This proves the inequality, including and .
Bochner dominated convergence theorem
Statement
Assume . Let be strongly measurable, suppose in norm for almost every , and let be a nonnegative integrable scalar function with almost everywhere for every . Then and all are Bochner integrable,
and in norm.
Facts & Assumptions
Countable Choice selects one member from every countable family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Finite norm integral characterizes Bochner integrability for a strongly measurable function (Bochner integrability criterion).
Strong measurability is a.e. pointwise norm approximation by finite-valued measurable simple functions (Strongly measurable Banach-valued function).
Pointwise scalar limits and countable suprema preserve measurability (Sequential suprema, infima, limsup, liminf, and pointwise limits of measurable functions are measurable).
Scalar dominated convergence yields convergence (Dominated convergence).
A Bochner integral is bounded in norm by the integral of the pointwise norm (Bochner integral norm inequality).
Simple Banach-valued integrals are linear (The Banach-valued simple integral is well defined).
Proof
Given: The sequence, limit, domination, and in the Statement.
Select simultaneous strong-measurability witnesses. [given, A1, L2, choose] Use [A1] exactly once to choose, for every , a simple approximation sequence witnessing the strong measurability in [L2]. Unite their exceptional null sets with those from convergence and domination; countable additivity makes the union null. Modify all functions and approximants to be zero there. We now have pointwise convergence everywhere and a doubly indexed family of simple approximants.
Obtain a common countable range and measurable distances. [L3, step 1.1] Let be together with all values of all selected simple approximants. It is countable. For each , the range of lies in , hence the pointwise limit also takes values in . For , the functions are measurable by applying [L3] to the simple approximants, and is measurable by applying [L3] once more to .
Build finite-valued approximants to the limit. [L2, step 2.1, construct] Enumerate with repetitions as . For each , assign to be the least-indexed nearest point to among . The finitely many tie-broken Voronoi cells are measurable by step 2.1, so is simple; density gives . Thus is strongly measurable.
Apply the scalar dominated-convergence theorem. [L1, L4, step 3.1] Passing to the pointwise limit in gives . By [L1], and every are Bochner integrable. Moreover , so [L4] gives .
Pass from convergence to integral convergence. [L1, L5, L6, step 4.1] Combining simple approximations to and , [L6] and approximation independence from [L1] show that . Apply [L5]: by step 4.1. If the measure space is empty or a.e., every integral is zero; no separate endpoint convention is needed.
Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration
Statement
Let be Banach spaces, let be bounded and linear, and let be Bochner integrable. Then is Bochner integrable and, for every measurable ,
Facts & Assumptions
A bounded linear operator satisfies for some finite (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces).
A Bochner integral is the norm limit of integrals of an -approximating simple sequence (Bochner-integrable function).
The Banach-valued simple integral is linear and representation-independent (The Banach-valued simple integral is well defined).
Proof
Given: as in the Statement.
Restrict a defining approximation to the measurable set. Choose integrable simple with . Then is an integrable -valued simple function: every nonzero level is a finite union of level sets of .
Prove Bochner integrability after applying . By [L1], . Thus [L2] makes Bochner integrable.
Commute with the defining limit. [L1, L2, L3, step 1.1, step 2.1] For each simple , finite linearity in [L3] gives . Boundedness makes norm-continuous, so taking limits in this equality and using [L2] proves the displayed identity. If , , or , both sides are explicitly zero.
Banach-valued vector measure and variation
Definition
Let be a measurable space and a real or complex Banach space. An -valued vector measure is a map such that and, for every pairwise disjoint sequence in ,
where the series converges in the norm of .
Its variation is the extended nonnegative set function
We set . The vector measure has bounded variation if .
Given a positive measure on , write when implies for every .
Remarks
Norm countable additivity, finiteness of variation, and absolute continuity with respect to a named scalar measure are three separate conditions. The one-cell partition gives , while the empty partition convention gives zero variation on the empty set.
Bounded variation of a vector measure is a finite measure
Statement
If is a norm-countably additive vector measure of bounded variation, then is a finite positive countably additive measure. Moreover, for every ,
for every measurable .
Facts & Assumptions
Vector-measure variation is the supremum of norm sums over finite measurable partitions, and bounded variation means finite total variation (Banach-valued vector measure and variation).
A bounded functional satisfies (The dual space X^* of a normed space and its dual norm).
Proof
Given: A bounded-variation vector measure and a bounded functional .
Prove finite additivity of variation. For disjoint , joining finite partitions of and shows (use partitions within of each supremum). Conversely, intersect any finite partition of with and ; finite additivity of and the triangle inequality show that its norm sum is at most . Taking the supremum gives equality.
Prove the functional domination estimate. For every finite partition of , [L2] gives . Taking suprema as in [L1] proves the displayed inequality, including and .
Prove countable additivity. Let . Finite additivity gives , hence . For the reverse inequality, take any finite partition of . Norm countable additivity gives , so . Taking the supremum over proves the reverse inequality.
Conclude finiteness and all boundary cases. [L1, step 1.2, step 2.1] The empty partition gives , step 2.1 gives countable additivity, and bounded variation in [L1] gives . Thus is a finite positive measure, and step 1.2 supplies the asserted scalar-variation bound.
A Bochner density defines an absolutely continuous vector measure
Statement
If is Bochner integrable and , then is a norm-countably additive vector measure, , and
for every measurable .
Facts & Assumptions
Vector measures, variation, and absolute continuity have the stated norm and partition meanings (Banach-valued vector measure and variation).
Bochner integrals satisfy the norm inequality (Bochner integral norm inequality).
For an integrable scalar function, its indefinite integral is countably additive (The indefinite integral of an integrable function is countably additive on measurable sets).
A Bochner-integrable function has integrable scalar norm and one defining simple approximation (Bochner integrability criterion, Bochner-integrable function). If is integrable simple, then (Banach-valued simple function and integral), and this integral is representation-independent and linear (The Banach-valued simple integral is well defined).
Bounded variation makes variation a finite measure (Bounded variation of a vector measure is a finite measure).
Proof
Given: A Bochner-integrable and the set function in the Statement.
Establish scalar control and absolute continuity. By [L4], is integrable. Put . By [L3], is a finite positive measure. By [L2], , so . For every finite partition of , summing the same inequality gives ; hence by [L1].
Fix a simple approximation for the reverse variation bound. Choose integrable simple with as supplied by [L4]. For fixed , partition into the nonzero level sets of and the remaining zero cell.
Prove norm countable additivity without a new choice. For disjoint with union , finite additivity follows from simple approximation and [L4]. Moreover by countable additivity of the finite measure . Thus is norm-countably additive.
Prove the reverse variation inequality. On the partition from step 1.2, [L2] and [L4] give . The pointwise inequality then yields . Letting proves .
Combine the bounds and close all cases. [L1, L5, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 2.2] Steps 1.1 and 2.2 give ; step 2.1 gives the required vector measure. In particular variation is finite (consistently with [L5]). For , , or a one-level simple density, the equality reduces respectively to , , or .
Radon--Nikodym property
Definition
A real or complex Banach space has the Radon--Nikodym property (RNP) if the following holds. For every finite measure space and every norm-countably additive -valued vector measure of bounded variation satisfying , there exists a Bochner-integrable function such that
Such an is called a Bochner density of with respect to . The equality is required on every measurable set, not only on .
Remarks
- The control measure is finite; the vector measure separately has bounded variation and is absolutely continuous with respect to it.
- The zero Banach space has RNP, with the zero density for its only vector measure. On the empty measure space the same density satisfies the condition.
- The definition is a property of the Banach target. It is stronger than the scalar Radon--Nikodym theorem when the target is arbitrary.
Dentable bounded set and slice
Definition
Let be a nonempty bounded subset of a real or complex Banach space . For and , the slice of determined by is
The real part is omitted over the real field. Boundedness of and continuity of make the displayed supremum finite, and its defining property makes the slice nonempty.
The norm diameter of is , with diameter for a singleton. The set is dentable if for every it has a slice with diameter less than .
Remarks
- If has diameter zero, the zero functional gives the whole set as a slice, so is dentable. This includes the singleton unit ball of the zero Banach space.
- If has positive diameter and a slice is smaller than , its defining functional is necessarily nonzero. Thus the zero functional introduces no spurious nondegenerate denting.
- Strict inequality and ensure that endpoint nonattainment of the supremum does not make a slice empty.
Dentable average ranges give vector-measure densities
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. If every nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a Banach space is dentable, then has the Radon--Nikodym property.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice supplies choices from arbitrary nonempty families (The Axiom of Choice).
RNP asks for a Bochner density of every bounded-variation vector measure absolutely continuous with respect to a finite scalar measure (Radon--Nikodym property).
Dentability means existence of slices of arbitrarily small norm diameter (Dentable bounded set and slice).
The variation of a bounded-variation vector measure is a finite positive measure (Bounded variation of a vector measure is a finite measure).
Under AC, an absolutely continuous finite scalar measure has an integrable Radon--Nikodym density (A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density), and integration against that density agrees with integration for the density measure (Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product).
A Bochner density measure has variation equal to the integral of its norm (A Bochner density defines an absolutely continuous vector measure).
Strong measurability plus finite norm integral is equivalent to Bochner integrability (Bochner integrability criterion); nonnegative monotone convergence controls increasing sums (Monotone convergence for the integral).
Simple Banach-valued integrals are linear and computed level by level (The Banach-valued simple integral is well defined).
Proof
Given: The dentability hypothesis and data from [L1].
Normalize by the variation measure. Put . By [L3], is finite, and implies by refining subsets of a -null set. If , has the zero density. Otherwise [L4], using [A1], gives with . We first construct a density with respect to , for which holds tautologically.
Pass dentability to every average range. For with , put and . Then . The closed convex hull is nonempty, bounded, and dentable by hypothesis. A small slice of meets , because its defining supremum over equals the supremum over ; its intersection with has no larger diameter. Thus every is dentable.
Find a positive subset with a small average range. Fix and positive . If every positive had , then for each such and every some positive would satisfy . Using [A1] and a maximal-disjoint-family argument, choose disjoint positive with which exhaust modulo . Norm countable additivity gives , so lies in the closed convex hull of points of more than away. A slice of of diameter less than cannot contain both and a member of this convex combination above the same slice threshold, contradicting step 1.2. Hence some positive has .
Exhaust the space by good pieces and estimate the error. Choose a maximal disjoint family of positive sets with . Step 2.1 forces it to cover modulo ; finiteness of makes the family countable. Put . Its finite partial sums show strong measurability, and , so [L6] gives Bochner integrability. For measurable , is the sum over of (zero intersections omitted). Consequently every finite partition of gives the variation estimate .
Produce an -Cauchy sequence. Use [A1] to choose for all . By [L5] and the triangle inequality for variation, . Thus the series of differences is summable.
Construct and identify the normalized density. By [L6], monotone convergence applied to shows that the norm series is finite a.e. Hence, by completeness of , converges a.e. to a strongly measurable , and the same tail estimate gives in . The criterion in [L6] makes Bochner integrable. For every , step 3.1 and the norm integral inequality give . Thus .
Transfer the density back to the original control measure. Set (and where ). Products of scalar and vector simple approximants show that is strongly measurable. By [L4], , so [L6] makes Bochner integrable. If in are simple, [L7] and [L4] give level by level, while [L4] identifies the two errors. Passing to the limit yields .
Conclude RNP and record the choice cost. [A1, L1, step 6.1] The construction applies to arbitrary data in [L1], so has RNP. The exact non-finite uses of [A1] are scalar Radon--Nikodym in step 1.1, maximal disjoint families in steps 2.1 and 3.1, and simultaneous selection of the sequence in step 4.1. Empty and zero-variation cases were settled in step 1.1; one-piece exhaustions are included in step 3.1.
Nondentability produces a vector measure without density
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. If a Banach space contains a nondentable nonempty bounded closed convex set, then on the Lebesgue interval there is an absolutely continuous bounded-variation -valued vector measure whose range lies in a closed separable subspace of and which has no Bochner density.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice supplies arbitrary and recursive choices (The Axiom of Choice).
Dentability is the existence of slices of arbitrarily small norm diameter (Dentable bounded set and slice).
Under AC, dominated Hahn--Banach establishes HB, and under HB a point outside a nonempty closed convex set in a real or complex normed space can be uniformly strictly separated from it by a bounded functional (Hahn-Banach dominated extension theorem for real vector spaces, Relative geometric Hahn–Banach with the exact open, closed, and compact hypotheses).
RNP requires a Bochner density for every absolutely continuous bounded-variation vector measure over a finite scalar measure (Radon--Nikodym property).
A Bochner-integrable function has integrable simple approximants (Bochner-integrable function) and its integral obeys the norm inequality (Bochner integral norm inequality).
Continuity from below and measurable set-difference calculus hold for measures (Continuity from below for measures, Measure of a set difference when the smaller set has finite measure), and the Lebesgue sigma-algebra is the completion of the Borel one ( is exactly the completion of the restriction of to the Borel sets).
Proof
Given: A nondentable nonempty bounded closed convex set and AC.
Convert nondentability into a uniformly separated convex bush. Choose such that no slice of has diameter below , and put . For , if , [L2] gives a slice lying inside and hence of diameter at most , a contradiction. Thus every belongs to that closed convex hull. Enlarge to . Given , approximate by a finite convex combination of points outside with error satisfying , and put . Then , every , and . With , [A1] recursively chooses such finite successor families from an initial . The resulting node set is countable, bounded, and every child is at least from its parent.
Realize the bush as a separated interval martingale. Starting with , partition every atom at level into finitely many half-open subintervals in the successor proportions , put the corresponding child value on each, and overlay the dyadic grid of mesh . Let be the resulting refining finite interval partition. Parent averages equal parent values, so is a martingale on these finite algebras; it is uniformly bounded and away from the finitely many endpoints. The union algebra contains every dyadic interval algebra.
Define and extend the dominated vector measure. For set . The martingale identity makes this independent of , and if , then . The class of Borel sets approximable in symmetric-difference measure by is a sigma-algebra: complements preserve the distance, and countable unions reduce by [L5] to one large finite union. It contains the dyadic algebra and hence all Borel sets; the completion clause in [L5] adds Lebesgue sets. Choose such approximants. Completeness of gives a unique extension with ; the same estimate proves norm countable additivity. Summing it over finite partitions gives , so and has bounded variation. Every algebra value is a finite linear combination of bush nodes, hence every extended value lies in the closed separable span of the countable node set.
Assume a density and identify all its finite-partition averages. Suppose satisfies for all Lebesgue . For every atom of , the construction gives . Thus the atomwise averaging operator applied to equals .
Prove that the atomwise averages of a Bochner density converge in . Choose an integrable simple with by [L4]. By the approximation proved in step 3.1 and finiteness of its level family, approximate the level sets of by sets in , obtaining an -simple with . For all sufficiently large , . The norm inequality on each atom shows that is an contraction, so . Hence in .
Contradict the fixed separation and conclude. [discharge-contradiction: step 5.1, L3, step 2.1, step 4.1, step 5.1] Step 5.1 would imply , whereas step 2.1 gives for every . Thus no density exists. The measure in step 3.1 is the witness required by [L3], with separable range. The exact uses of [A1] are strict separation through [L2], recursive bush and partition choices, and the countable approximation choices in extending . The empty interval endpoints form null sets; the one-child case cannot occur because every child is -separated.
RNP--dentability characterization
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. A Banach space has the Radon--Nikodym property if and only if every nonempty bounded closed convex subset of is dentable.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).
RNP is the density property for absolutely continuous bounded-variation vector measures (Radon--Nikodym property).
Under AC, dentability of every nonempty bounded closed convex set supplies all required vector-measure densities (Dentable average ranges give vector-measure densities).
Under AC, any nondentable such set supplies an absolutely continuous bounded-variation Lebesgue vector measure without a Bochner density (Nondentability produces a vector measure without density).
Proof
Given: A Banach space and AC.
Prove the dentability-to-RNP implication. If every nonempty bounded closed convex subset of is dentable, [L2] applies and gives RNP.
Prove the RNP-to-dentability implication. Assume has RNP. If a nonempty bounded closed convex set were nondentable, [L3] would give a finite-measure, absolutely continuous bounded-variation vector measure without a Bochner density, contradicting [L1]. Thus every such set is dentable.
Combine the implications and close the degenerate case. [A1, step 1.1, step 1.2] Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the equivalence. For the zero Banach space the only nonempty bounded closed convex sets are singletons, which are dentable by the zero-functional slice, and its only vector measure has the zero density. All AC use is inherited exactly from [L2] and [L3].
RNP is invariant under Banach-space isomorphism
Statement
Let be a bounded linear bijection between Banach spaces with bounded inverse. Then has RNP if and only if has RNP.
Facts & Assumptions
A Banach-space topological isomorphism and its inverse are bounded linear maps (A topological isomorphism of normed spaces).
Over every finite control measure, RNP supplies Bochner densities for absolutely continuous bounded-variation vector measures (Radon--Nikodym property).
Bounded linear maps preserve Bochner integrability and commute with its integral (Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration).
Proof
Given: An isomorphism as in the Statement.
Transport a -valued vector measure to . Assume has RNP, let be a finite measure space, and let be a bounded-variation -valued measure with . Put . By [L1], it is norm-countably additive, , and .
Transport the density back to . By [L2], choose a Bochner density of . Then [L3] makes Bochner integrable and gives for every measurable . Thus has RNP.
Apply the same implication to the inverse. [L1, step 2.1] If has RNP, apply steps 1.1--2.1 with the bounded isomorphism to obtain RNP for . Hence the two properties are equivalent. For zero spaces, zero measures, and empty control spaces, every transported object and density is zero, so both directions remain valid.
RNP is separably determined
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. A Banach space has RNP if and only if every closed separable subspace of has RNP.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).
RNP is the bounded-variation vector-measure density property (Radon--Nikodym property).
Under AC, RNP is equivalent to dentability of every nonempty bounded closed convex set (RNP--dentability characterization).
Under AC, nondentability supplies a density-free Lebesgue vector measure whose range lies in a closed separable subspace (Nondentability produces a vector measure without density).
A bounded linear inclusion preserves Bochner integrability and commutes with integration (Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration).
Proof
Given: A Banach space and AC.
Transfer dentability to a closed subspace. Assume has RNP and let be a closed separable subspace. Any nonempty bounded closed convex is also closed in . By [L2] it has arbitrarily small slices determined by functionals in . Restricting such a functional to gives the same slice of , including the zero-functional singleton case. Thus every such is dentable in .
Conclude the forward implication. Apply the reverse direction of [L2] inside to conclude that has RNP. Hence RNP passes to every closed separable subspace.
Obtain the separable-range witness for the converse. Now assume every closed separable subspace of has RNP. If failed RNP, [L2] would give a nondentable bounded closed convex set, and [L3] would yield an absolutely continuous bounded-variation vector measure on with no -valued density and with range in a closed separable subspace .
Use the subspace density to contradict the witness. Regarded as a -valued measure, has the same variation and absolute continuity. By the assumed RNP of and [L1], it has a Bochner density . The isometric inclusion is bounded; [L4] gives in , contradicting step 3.1.
Combine both directions and record boundaries. [A1, step 2.1, step 4.1] Steps 2.1 and 4.1 prove the equivalence. The zero subspace is closed and separable and has its zero density; if both sides hold. The full-AC cost is precisely that inherited from [L2] and [L3].
RNP may be tested on the Lebesgue interval
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. A Banach space has RNP if and only if every bounded-variation -valued vector measure on the Lebesgue sigma-algebra of which is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure has a Bochner density.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).
RNP requires the density property on every finite measure space (Radon--Nikodym property).
Under AC, failure of RNP is equivalent to the presence of a nondentable bounded closed convex set (RNP--dentability characterization).
Such nondentability yields an absolutely continuous bounded-variation Lebesgue interval vector measure without a Bochner density (Nondentability produces a vector measure without density).
Proof
Given: A Banach space and AC.
Prove the forward interval implication. If has RNP, apply [L1] to the finite measure space . Every interval measure in the Statement then has a Bochner density.
Prove the converse interval implication. Assume the stated interval test holds. If failed RNP, [L2] would supply a nondentable bounded closed convex set and [L3] would supply precisely an interval measure covered by the test but having no density, a contradiction. Thus has RNP.
Combine both directions and record degenerate cases. [A1, step 1.1, step 1.2] The two implications prove the equivalence. For or the zero vector measure, the density is zero. Lebesgue measure is finite and includes the endpoints, whose singleton sets are null. The full-AC cost is exactly that of [L2]--[L3].
Lipschitz curves and dominated interval vector measures
Statement
Assume . Let be a real or complex Banach space and let be Lipschitz with constant and . There is a unique -valued vector measure on the Lebesgue sigma-algebra such that
and . Conversely, if an -valued vector measure satisfies , then is Lipschitz, is based at zero, and induces .
Facts & Assumptions
Countable Choice holds (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
A Lipschitz map with constant satisfies the uniform distance bound (Lipschitz map, -Hölder map for rational , and contraction).
Vector measures are norm-countably additive and their variation is a finite-partition supremum (Banach-valued vector measure and variation).
Continuity from below and set-difference measure calculus hold (Continuity from below for measures, Measure of a set difference when the smaller set has finite measure), and under Countable Choice the Lebesgue sigma-algebra is the completion of Borel Lebesgue measure ( is exactly the completion of the restriction of to the Borel sets).
Proof
Given: The Banach space and the curve or vector measure in the corresponding part of the Statement, and .
Define the increment measure on the rational interval algebra. On the algebra generated by rational half-open intervals and , set . For a finite disjoint union with rational endpoints in , put . Common endpoint refinement and telescoping make this representation-independent and finitely additive. By [L1], and, more generally, .
Extend to every Lebesgue set. The class of Borel sets approximable in symmetric-difference measure by the rational interval algebra is a sigma-algebra: complements preserve the distance, and countable unions reduce by continuity from below in [L3] to one large finite union. It contains the rational intervals and hence all Borel sets; the completion assertion in [L3] adds every Lebesgue set. Use [A1] to select an approximating sequence for . Step 1.1 makes Cauchy, so completeness of defines independently of the approximants. The bound follows by passage to the limit. Finite additivity and this bound show norm countable additivity: for disjoint , the unaccounted tail has norm at most . Thus [L2] applies.
Verify variation, all endpoints, and uniqueness. Summing the bound from step 2.1 over any finite partition gives . Rational endpoints satisfy the increment formula by construction; rational approximation to arbitrary , the same measure bound, and continuity from [L1] give it for all endpoints. In particular . Any other dominated vector measure agreeing on rational intervals agrees on their algebra, and [L3] plus its domination gives equality on every Lebesgue set.
Recover a Lipschitz curve from a dominated vector measure. Conversely let and define . Then and, for , , so [L1] makes Lipschitz. Its increment measure agrees with on intervals and hence, by uniqueness in step 3.1, everywhere.
Combine both directions and record the choice boundary. [A1, step 3.1, step 4.1] Steps 1.1--3.1 and step 4.1 are inverse constructions. If , both the curve and measure are zero; the empty interval and singleton endpoints have zero increment. A one-interval algebra element is the defining case. The exact choice cost is [A1] in the countable-algebra approximation supplied by [L3]; all other selections are finite or least-indexed.
AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration
Statement
In ZF, assume the Axiom of Choice. Then the Axiom of Countable Choice holds. Moreover, if is a serial relation on a nonempty set and , there is a sequence such that and for every . Thus AC supplies the prescribed-initial-point form of Dependent Choice.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: ZF and the Axiom of Choice.
AC supplies a choice function on any set of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Choice).
Countable Choice asks for a choice function on every countable family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Prescribed-initial-point Dependent Choice asks for a sequence through any serial relation on a nonempty set, beginning at the supplied point (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
A supplied self-map and starting point determine a unique sequence with and (The recursion theorem).
Proof
Let be a countable family of nonempty sets. Its image is a set of nonempty sets, so [F1] gives a choice function on . Define . Then for every , proving [F2]. Repeated members of the family cause no ambiguity because assigns them the same selected value. The empty subfamily has the empty choice function, and singleton members force their unique values.
Let , , and satisfy the second assertion. For put . Seriality makes every nonempty. Apply [F1] to the set , choose for every , and define . This is a well-defined self-map even if two successor sets coincide, and for every .
Apply [F4] to and . The resulting sequence satisfies and , hence by step 1.2. This is exactly [F3]. If is a singleton, seriality forces the constant sequence; the empty-set case is excluded by the supplied . AC is used only for the fixed-family selections in steps 1.1 and 1.2, while recursion makes no further choice.
RNP and almost-everywhere differentiability of Lipschitz curves
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. A Banach space has the Radon--Nikodym property if and only if every Lipschitz map is norm differentiable at Lebesgue-almost every ; that is, for almost every such there is an for which
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).
In ZF, AC implies Dependent Choice and Countable Choice (AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration).
Under Countable Choice, based Lipschitz curves correspond to interval vector measures dominated in variation by Lebesgue measure (Lipschitz curves and dominated interval vector measures).
Under AC, RNP is equivalent to the Bochner-density property for bounded-variation vector measures on the Lebesgue interval (RNP may be tested on the Lebesgue interval).
Bochner integrability is approximation by integrable simple functions (Bochner-integrable function), and for strongly measurable functions it is equivalent to integrability of the norm (Bochner integrability criterion, Strongly measurable Banach-valued function).
Scalar functions are recovered almost everywhere by small interval averages, and countable unions of Lebesgue-null sets are null under Countable Choice (Lebesgue differentiation theorem on , A countable union of measure-zero sets has measure zero, by countable choice).
A Bochner density induces a vector measure whose variation is the integral of its norm (A Bochner density defines an absolutely continuous vector measure).
Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration (Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration).
The variation of a bounded-variation vector measure is a finite positive measure (Bounded variation of a vector measure is a finite measure), and under AC a finite absolutely continuous scalar measure has an integrable Radon--Nikodym density (A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density).
Real Lipschitz functions are absolutely continuous, and under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice the scalar FTC recovers an absolutely continuous function from its derivative ( implies Lipschitz, Lipschitz implies absolutely continuous, and absolutely continuous implies continuous and bounded variation, Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions).
The continuous dual separates distinct vectors (The dual space separates points of a normed space).
Under Countable Choice, dominated pointwise convergence implies and integral convergence for strongly measurable Banach-valued functions (Bochner dominated convergence theorem).
Proof
Given: A Banach space and AC.
Make the inherited choice assumptions explicit. By [L1], [A1] supplies both Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. Countable Choice is used in [L2], [L5], and [L11]; both principles are hypotheses of the scalar FTC in [L9].
Associate a dominated vector measure to a Lipschitz curve. Suppose first that has RNP, let be -Lipschitz, and put . Then and [L2] gives a vector measure with and .
Reduce an arbitrary interval vector measure to bounded-density levels. For the converse direction, let be a bounded-variation vector measure on with . If , every member of every finite partition of is null and has -value zero, so . Thus . By [L8] and AC there is an integrable scalar density with . Positivity of makes almost everywhere: applying the representation to for each makes each such set null. Replace by zero on their null union. Put for and . The are disjoint, is null, and they cover . Define . Directly from finite partitions, .
Obtain a Bochner density in the RNP-to-differentiability direction. The interval test [L3] applied to supplies a Bochner-integrable with . Hence for every .
Turn each bounded level measure into a Lipschitz curve. For each , set . The converse part of [L2] and the bound in step 1.3 show that and that is -Lipschitz.
Prepare a common set of vector Lebesgue points. Choose integrable simple with as in [L4]. Passing to a subsequence if necessary, the scalar errors converge to zero almost everywhere: choose least indices with errors below , and the sets where the corresponding pointwise error exceeds have summable measures, so their tail unions decrease to a null set. Extend and the finitely many indicator functions of the level sets of by zero outside . Apply [L5] to every one of this countable family and remove the union of their exceptional null sets. At each remaining interior point , every differentiates by interval averages, , and
for every ; the last equality follows by writing the finite-valued on its level sets and differentiating their indicators.
Construct measurable derivative fields for the bounded level curves. By the assumed differentiability property, for each there is a measurable null set off which exists in norm. For put when , and put it equal to zero on the remaining interval. On the first piece is -Lipschitz; a finite interval partition of sufficiently small mesh, together with the constant-zero last piece, therefore gives a measurable simple function within uniformly of . These simple functions converge to off . Define there and on . This proves strong measurability in the sense of [L4]. Difference quotients give off , so [L4] makes Bochner integrable.
Differentiate the indefinite Bochner integral in norm. At a point retained in step 3.1, for fixed the triangle inequality gives
Indeed the three terms are the average of , the average of , and . Letting makes the right side zero. For nonzero small enough that , step 2.1 now yields
which is at most twice the corresponding centred average and tends to zero. Thus at almost every .
Show that each derivative field represents its level measure. Fix and . The real-valued function in the real case, and its real and imaginary parts in the complex case, are Lipschitz and hence absolutely continuous by [L9]. Their derivatives agree almost everywhere with the corresponding scalar parts of . The scalar FTC, whose choice hypotheses were supplied in step 1.1, and commutation in [L7] give
By [L10], . The measure induced by has variation at most by [L6], so uniqueness in [L2] makes it equal to on every Lebesgue set. Finally put . Restricting simple approximants shows , so is another density of , now supported on .
Complete the forward implication, including its boundary cases. Step 4.1 proves almost-everywhere norm differentiability of every Lipschitz curve when has RNP. Adding the constant does not affect difference quotients. If , the curve is constant and has derivative zero everywhere; the endpoints are excluded from the derivative assertion and have measure zero. The zero Banach space and the one-point interval cause no exception.
Paste the bounded derivative fields into one density. Define on and on . The explicit simple approximants from step 3.2, multiplied by and summed for , form a simple sequence converging to off the countable union of the and ; [L5] makes that union null. Hence is strongly measurable. Moreover , so [L4] makes Bochner integrable. Let . Then pointwise and . Applying [L11] to for any measurable gives . Finite linearity follows by combining the simple approximations in [L4], so step 4.2 gives . Norm countable additivity of and make the latter sums converge to . Thus is a Bochner density of .
Conclude the equivalence and record the exact AC use. [A1, L3, step 5.1, step 5.2] Step 5.1 proves RNP implies almost-everywhere differentiability. Conversely, step 5.2 gives a density for every vector measure in the interval test [L3], so has RNP. AC is used by the scalar Radon--Nikodym theorem, the interval RNP test, and through step 1.1 for countable null-set, dominated-convergence, and scalar-FTC suppliers. Empty and zero measures give the zero density, and both directions of the equivalence have been proved.
Separable dual spaces have the Radon--Nikodym property
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. If is a real or complex normed space and its continuous dual is norm separable, then the Banach space has the Radon--Nikodym property.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).
AC implies Countable Choice and the relative Hahn--Banach principle: the former follows from the preceding local choice lemma, while the latter is realized by the AC form of dominated Hahn--Banach (AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration, Hahn-Banach dominated extension theorem for real vector spaces).
Under Countable Choice and relative Hahn--Banach, norm separability of implies norm separability of (Separable dual implies separable primal).
RNP is the Bochner-density assertion for every absolutely continuous bounded-variation vector measure over a finite measure (Radon--Nikodym property), and the variation of such a vector measure is a finite positive measure (Bounded variation of a vector measure is a finite measure).
On the finite measure spaces fixed in [L3], hence on sigma-finite reference spaces, AC gives integrable scalar densities for finite absolutely continuous signed and complex measures (A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density, A finite complex measure absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has an integrable complex density).
The variation of a scalar measure with density has density (The total variation of an absolutely continuous signed or complex measure has density the absolute value of the Radon-Nikodym derivative).
Countable scalar suprema and pointwise limits preserve measurability (Sequential suprema, infima, limsup, liminf, and pointwise limits of measurable functions are measurable).
A strongly measurable Banach-valued function is Bochner integrable when its norm is integrable (Bochner integrability criterion), and bounded linear maps commute with its integral (Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration).
Nonempty at most countable sets can be enumerated; rational and Gaussian rational finite spans are countable under Countable Choice (A nonempty set is at most countable iff it is a surjective image of , is countably infinite, Both and are dense in , and every nonempty open subset of is uncountable, A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable, Countable unions of at most countable sets, assuming , Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset).
Proof
Given: AC, a normed space , and a norm-separable dual .
Obtain the needed separability and choice interfaces. By [L1], AC supplies Countable Choice and proves every instance of the relative Hahn--Banach principle. Thus [L2] applies and makes norm separable. Adjoin zero to chosen countable dense subsets of and so that [L8] enumerates both even in the zero-space case.
Fix a vector measure and dominate it by one scalar density. Let be a finite measure space and let have bounded variation with . If , every cell in a finite partition of has zero -value, so . Hence . By [L3] it is a finite positive measure, and [L4] gives an integrable real density with . Positivity, tested on , permits replacing on a null set so that everywhere.
Choose a countable linear test space and all its scalar densities. Let in the real case and in the complex case. The -linear span of a countable dense subset of is countable and norm dense by [L8]. For define the finite signed or complex measure . Its partition sums satisfy , and . Apply [L4], using AC to choose simultaneously for all , measurable such that .
Make the scalar representatives pointwise linear and bounded. Uniqueness of scalar densities says, for every and , that almost everywhere. There are only countably many such relations. Moreover [L5] and the variation estimate in step 2.1 give
Testing this inequality on shows almost everywhere, for every . The union of the exceptional sets for all relations, bounds, and is null by countable additivity. Replace every by zero there. Off this one null set, the map is -linear and bounded by .
Extend the pointwise functionals to . For every remaining , continuity and density of extend uniquely to a scalar-linear functional with . In the complex case, -linearity and continuity give full complex linearity. Set on the common null set. Then for all off that set.
Prove strong measurability rather than merely coordinate measurability. Fix . Using an enumeration of , for every integer take the least indexed with . Step 3.1 gives off the common null set, so [L6] makes every coordinate measurable. Let enumerate a countable dense subset of the unit ball of obtained from by rational rescaling. For each ,
so [L6] makes this distance measurable. Finally enumerate a norm-dense positively indexed sequence in the separable space . For each integer , assign to the least indexed nearest point among . The measurable distance functions make its finitely many tie-broken cells measurable, and density makes these simple functions converge in norm to . Thus is strongly measurable.
Integrate the extension and identify the vector measure. The bound and [L7] make Bochner integrable. For , boundedness of evaluation at , commutation in [L7], and step 2.1 give
Both and are continuous functionals on and agree on the norm-dense subspace , so they agree on all of . Hence for every measurable .
Conclude RNP and close the degenerate cases. [A1, L3, step 1.1, step 6.1] The measure space and were arbitrary, so step 6.1 proves the RNP condition in [L3]. If , every scalar measure and every density above is zero; if or , take . A one-point dense set and a one-element rational span are covered by the same construction. AC is used for Hahn--Banach and Countable Choice in step 1.1, scalar RN and simultaneous representatives in steps 1.2--2.1, and the common countable family of a.e. relations; no stronger unstated choice is used.
Hilbert spaces are reflexive by Riesz representation
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Every complete real or complex inner-product space , with its inner-product norm, is reflexive.
Facts & Assumptions
Countable Choice selects one member from each countable family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The inner product is linear in its first argument and conjugate-linear in its second, and its norm is the square root of the diagonal pairing (Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument, The norm induced by a real or complex inner product).
Cauchy--Schwarz bounds inner products by products of norms (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors), and the parallelogram identity holds (Pythagoras, the parallelogram identity, and the real and complex polarisation identities).
Nonempty real sets bounded below have infima, characterized by points arbitrarily close from above (Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum, Epsilon characterisation of the infimum).
Completeness for the inner-product norm is the Banach condition (Banach space). The continuous dual uses the operator norm (The dual space X^* of a normed space and its dual norm) and is Banach because its scalar target is Banach (If (Y) is Banach then (\mathcal B(X,Y)) is Banach).
Reflexivity means surjectivity of the canonical evaluation map (Reflexivity is surjectivity of the canonical map).
Proof
Given: Countable Choice and a complete real or complex inner-product space .
Set up the Riesz representation problem. Let . If , then for every . Suppose and put . This is a nonempty closed affine set. The nonempty set of its norms is bounded below, so let . Since on , one has .
Select and control a norm-minimizing sequence. For every , [L3] makes nonempty. Use [A1] exactly here to select for all . Since , [L2] gives
The right side tends to zero as , so is Cauchy.
Obtain the unique minimum. Completeness gives . Continuity of gives , so , while norm continuity gives . Thus realizes the positive minimum of the norm on .
Derive Riesz representation with the linear-first convention. If , then for every scalar , and minimality gives
If , choosing the scalar phase of a sufficiently small to make the middle term negative contradicts this inequality. Therefore . For arbitrary , the vector lies in , and linearity in the first argument now gives . Hence
Together with , this represents every functional. Uniqueness follows by evaluating the difference of two representing vectors at that same difference. Cauchy--Schwarz and the unit vector in the representing direction give .
Put the transported Hilbert structure on the dual. Define by . Step 4.1 says that is onto with inverse , and [L1] shows that both are conjugate-linear in the complex case and linear in the real case. They are isometries. Define on
The reversed order and the two conjugate-linear occurrences make this inner product linear in , conjugate-linear in , and positive definite; its norm is the existing dual norm. By [L4], is complete for that norm, so it too is a Hilbert space.
Identify every bidual functional with canonical evaluation. Apply the representation proved in steps 1.1--4.1 to the Hilbert space . For there is with for every . Put . Since , the definition in step 5.1 gives
Thus , so is surjective.
Conclude reflexivity and record all boundaries. [A1, L5, step 4.1, step 6.1] Surjectivity in step 6.1 is reflexivity by [L5]. If , then both and are zero and the canonical map is onto. The zero functional was separated before division, while nonzero gives , so every quotient is defined. The real case has trivial conjugation; step 5.1 tracks both conjugations in the complex case. Countable Choice is used only to select the minimizing sequence in step 2.1 (and again when the same proved representation is applied to ), not for any basis or uncountable family.
Reflexive spaces have the Radon--Nikodym property
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every real or complex reflexive Banach space has the Radon--Nikodym property.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).
AC implies Countable Choice and proves the real dominated Hahn--Banach principle; the complex norm-preserving extension theorem supplies the complex instances (AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration, Hahn-Banach dominated extension theorem for real vector spaces, A bounded complex linear functional on a subspace of a complex normed space extends with the same norm).
Under relative Hahn--Banach, closed subspaces of reflexive Banach spaces are reflexive (Closed subspaces of reflexive spaces are reflexive) and the canonical map into the bidual is an isometry (Relative Hahn–Banach makes the canonical bidual map an isometry).
Under AC, a norm-separable dual Banach space has RNP (Separable dual spaces have the Radon--Nikodym property), and RNP is invariant under Banach space isomorphism (RNP is invariant under Banach-space isomorphism).
Under AC, a Banach space has RNP exactly when all its closed separable subspaces have RNP (RNP is separably determined).
Reflexivity is surjectivity of the canonical evaluation map (Reflexivity is surjectivity of the canonical map), while separability means the existence of an at most countable norm-dense subset (Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset).
Proof
Given: AC and a reflexive Banach space .
Discharge the choice hypotheses of the reflexivity suppliers. By [L1], AC supplies Countable Choice and every instance of the relative Hahn--Banach principle used below.
Reduce to one closed separable subspace. Let be an arbitrary closed separable linear subspace. By [L2], is a reflexive Banach space. Thus its canonical map is onto by [L5] and is an isometry by [L2].
Exhibit the bidual as a separable dual space. Choose an at most countable norm-dense subset . The image is at most countable and is dense in : if and approximates , then . Hence is a norm-separable dual Banach space. Moreover is a bounded linear bijection with bounded inverse, indeed an isometry.
Transfer RNP from the bidual back to the subspace. The separable-dual theorem [L3] gives RNP to . Isomorphism invariance along then gives RNP to .
Apply separable determination. The closed separable subspace was arbitrary, so every closed separable subspace of has RNP. The reverse implication in [L4] therefore gives RNP to .
Record the scope and degenerate cases. [A1, step 1.1, step 3.1, step 5.1] If , its sole closed subspace, bidual, vector measures, and densities are zero, so the same proof applies. A zero subspace has the singleton dense set and its canonical map is the zero bijection. The argument works in both scalar fields because [L2] and [L3] do. AC is used exactly to supply relative Hahn--Banach and Countable Choice in steps 1.1--3.1 and through the two RNP suppliers [L3]--[L4]. No dual-reflexivity theorem or unstated canonical-map isometry is used.
fails the Radon--Nikodym property
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Over either or , the Banach space does not have the Radon--Nikodym property.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).
The sequence space has the supremum norm (The sequence spaces c_0 and ell-infinity) and is Banach over both scalar fields (Real and complex are Banach).
Every has the unique bilinear representation by a sequence (The continuous dual of c0 is ell-one), whose finite truncations converge in (Finite truncations approximate null and summable sequences).
A bounded set is dentable when it has slices of arbitrarily small norm diameter (Dentable bounded set and slice).
Under AC, RNP is equivalent to dentability of every nonempty bounded closed convex set (RNP--dentability characterization).
Proof
Given: AC and the closed unit ball of .
Fix an arbitrary slice and a point with positive margin. Let be any slice, and represent by [L2]. On one has : the upper bound is the dual-norm inequality, and multiplying an almost norming vector by a scalar of modulus one makes its -value real and nonnegative. By nonemptiness of the slice choose and put .
Change one remote coordinate in both directions. Truncation convergence in [L2] gives , so choose with . Define by retaining all coordinates of except and . Both sequences still tend to zero and have supremum norm at most one, so . Moreover
and the same estimate with puts in . Thus .
Compute every slice diameter and obtain nondentability. The triangle inequality bounds the diameter of , and hence of , by two; step 2.1 attains two. Therefore every slice of has diameter exactly two. In particular no slice has diameter below one, so is not dentable. The ball is nonempty, bounded, closed, and convex in the Banach space from [L1].
Apply the RNP--dentability characterization. If had RNP, [L4] would make its closed unit ball dentable, contradicting step 3.1. Hence fails RNP over both scalar fields.
Record the zero-functional and endpoint cases. [A1, L2, L3, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 4.1] If , the slice is all of ; take and any , so the same , witness diameter two. For nonzero , the strict slice margin ensures both perturbed points remain inside rather than merely on its boundary. A zero coefficient causes no difficulty. The complex proof uses the bilinear -- pairing and real parts exactly as in [L2]--[L3]; no conjugate is inserted. AC is used only through [L4].
fails the Radon--Nikodym property
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. The real and complex Banach spaces for nonatomic Lebesgue measure do not have the Radon--Nikodym property.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).
AC supplies Countable Choice (AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration). Under Countable Choice, Lebesgue measure is a complete measure and an interval has its length (Lebesgue measurable sets, the family , and the restricted set function , Assuming countable choice, is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and is a complete measure extending elementary volume, A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included).
Restriction to a measurable set is a measure (Restriction of a measure to a measurable set, The restriction of a measure to a measurable set is a measure).
Real is the quotient by almost-everywhere equality, its integral formula is a norm, and it is complete under Countable Choice (The space as the quotient by null functions, The norm descends to the quotient and makes a normed space for , Riesz-Fischer completeness of for ).
The same quotient norm and completeness statements hold for complex (Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions, Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm, Complex Lp completeness and almost-everywhere subsequences).
Under AC, a Banach space has RNP exactly when all its Lipschitz curves on are norm differentiable almost everywhere (RNP and almost-everywhere differentiability of Lipschitz curves).
Proof
Given: AC and either the real or complex scalar field.
Fix the precise model. Let on the Lebesgue sigma-algebra of . By [L1]--[L2] this is a finite measure. We use as the same-ambient realization of : values outside have zero seminorm. The real space is Banach by [L3], and the complex space is Banach by [L4]; [A1] supplies the Countable Choice required by the completeness results.
Construct the Lipschitz curve. For , put . Every representative is measurable and integrable. If , then
Thus is an isometric, and in particular one-Lipschitz, curve in either the real or complex target.
Calculate two incompatible positive difference quotients. Fix and . The positive difference quotient is
On the difference has absolute value , and on it again has absolute value . It vanishes elsewhere up to endpoints. Consequently
Prove failure of differentiability at every interior point. Choose, for example, . If existed in norm, both and would converge to it, so their mutual distances would tend to zero. Step 3.1 says every one of those distances is one, a contradiction. Hence is norm nondifferentiable at every .
Apply the Lipschitz characterization and close the boundary cases. [A1, L5, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 4.1] If either target had RNP, [L5] would make the one-Lipschitz curve norm differentiable at almost every interior point, contrary to step 4.1. Thus both targets fail RNP. Endpoint values cause no issue: and , while differentiability is asserted only on the interior. Open, closed, or half-open versions of the intervals define the same classes because their endpoint differences are null. The complex proof uses the same real-valued representatives inside complex . AC is used through [L5] and to supply the Countable Choice in step 1.1.
is not isomorphic to a dual space
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Over either or , the Banach space is not topologically isomorphic to the continuous dual of any normed space.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice), hence so does Countable Choice (AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration).
The finite truncations of every sequence converge in the supremum norm (The sequence spaces c_0 and ell-infinity, Finite truncations approximate null and summable sequences).
Rational finite spans are countable under Countable Choice (A nonempty set is at most countable iff it is a surjective image of , is countably infinite, A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable, Countable unions of at most countable sets, assuming ), the rationals are dense in the reals (Both and are dense in , and every nonempty open subset of is uncountable), and a space with a countable dense subset is separable (Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset).
A topological isomorphism is a bounded linear bijection with bounded inverse, and RNP is invariant under such isomorphisms between Banach spaces (A topological isomorphism of normed spaces, RNP is invariant under Banach-space isomorphism).
Under AC every norm-separable dual space has RNP (Separable dual spaces have the Radon--Nikodym property), whereas fails RNP ( fails the Radon--Nikodym property).
Proof
Given: AC and or .
Exhibit a countable dense subset of . Let in the real case and in the complex case, and let be the set of sequences with finite support and all coordinates in . For each support contained in its members form a finite product of a countable set; [L2], followed by the countable union over , makes countable. Given and , [L1] gives a finite truncation within of . Approximate its finitely many real coordinates, or both real and imaginary parts, by elements of within in the maximum norm. The resulting member of is within of . Thus is dense and is norm separable.
Transfer separability to a hypothesized dual. Suppose toward a contradiction that a topological isomorphism exists for some normed space . Since is continuous, is countable. It is dense in : for a nonempty norm-open set , the homeomorphism makes a nonempty open subset of , which meets , and hence meets . Therefore is norm separable.
Derive the RNP contradiction. By [L4], AC and norm separability give RNP to the dual . Isomorphism invariance [L3] then gives RNP to , contradicting the second assertion of [L4]. Hence no such and exist.
Close the scalar and degenerate cases. [A1, L1, L2, L3, L4, step 1.1, step 3.1] The Gaussian-rational choice in step 1.1 handles the complex norm without restricting scalars, and the real case uses ordinary rationals. The space is nonzero, so it cannot be isomorphic to the zero dual; if , the hypothesized bijection already fails. AC is used in [L4] and supplies the countability principles invoked in step 1.1.
Dunford--Pettis for real on a finite measure space
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a finite measure space, and let be a subset of the real Banach space of almost-everywhere equivalence classes. Then is relatively weakly compact if and only if it is uniformly integrable. Here uniform integrability is equivalently the conjunction of boundedness and uniform absolute continuity:
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).
AC supplies Dependent Choice and Countable Choice, the ultrafilter lemma, and the real Hahn--Banach principle (AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration, The ultrafilter lemma, from the Axiom of Choice: every filter extends to an ultrafilter, The real dominated-extension principle as an additional hypothesis over ZF, Hahn-Banach dominated extension theorem for real vector spaces).
Real is the almost-everywhere quotient with its integral norm and is complete under Countable Choice, hence is Banach (The space as the quotient by null functions, The norm descends to the quotient and makes a normed space for , Riesz-Fischer completeness of for , Banach space).
On a finite measure space, uniform integrability is exactly boundedness plus the displayed uniform absolute continuity (On a finite measure space, uniform integrability is equivalent to L^1-boundedness plus uniform absolute continuity).
Under the principles supplied by [L1], Eberlein--Smulian identifies relative weak compactness with relative weak sequential compactness, and every weakly convergent sequence is norm bounded (Relative weak compactness and three sequential notions, Eberlein–Šmulian theorem, Weakly convergent sequences are norm bounded, A strictly increasing index map satisfies ).
An individual integrable function has absolutely continuous integral, and under DC a nonempty complete metric space is a Baire space (Absolute continuity of the integral, Under Dependent Choice, a nonempty complete metric space is not a countable union of closed sets with empty interior).
Under Countable Choice, real is reflexive. Under the ultrafilter lemma and HB, its closed ball is weakly compact (Reflexivity of Lp for one less p less infinity, Reflexive iff unit ball weakly compact).
Holder's inequality gives the bounded inclusion on a finite measure space. Since a finite measure is sigma-finite, every member of is integration against a member of (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, On a sigma-finite measure space, every bounded linear functional on is integration against a unique function).
Under HB the canonical map is linear and isometric. The weak and weak-star topologies are their evaluation initial topologies, and weak-star addition and scalar multiplication are continuous; weak-star space is Hausdorff (Relative Hahn–Banach makes the canonical bidual map an isometry, Weak topology on a normed space, The weak-star topology from finite evaluations, Basic weak star neighborhoods).
Under the ultrafilter lemma, bidual balls are weak-star compact. Closed subsets and continuous images of compact spaces are compact, finite products of compact spaces are compact, and compact subsets of Hausdorff spaces are closed (Banach–Alaoglu, A closed subspace of a compact space is compact, and a finite union of compact subspaces is compact, A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism, A product of finitely many compact spaces is compact in the product topology, In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones).
Proof
Given: AC, a finite measure space, , and .
Expose every choice principle used below. By [L1], AC supplies Countable Choice for [L2] and [L6], DC for Baire and Eberlein--Smulian, the ultrafilter lemma for Alaoglu and the compactness forms in [L4], [L6], and [L9], and HB for [L4], [L6], and [L8]. No additional choice principle will be left implicit.
Fix the Banach and weak-topology conventions. By [L2], is the real Banach space of classes, not the raw class of integrable representatives. Its weak topology is . By [L8], is an isometry and a homeomorphism from weak to its image in with the relative weak-star topology: the identity makes the two evaluation families identical.
Dispose of the empty and null cases. If , it is relatively weakly compact and uniformly integrable vacuously. If , then and every subset of is finite, weakly compact, and uniformly integrable. Hence below we may assume and .
A relatively weakly compact family is norm bounded. Suppose is relatively weakly compact but not norm bounded. Using AC choose with . By Eberlein--Smulian in [L4], a subsequence converges weakly in . The weak-sequence boundedness theorem in [L4] makes its norms bounded, whereas strict increase of the indices gives and hence , a contradiction.
Set up the Baire argument for a weakly null sequence. Let in , and let with the metric. This set is closed: if a sequence of indicator classes converges in , [L2] supplies a subsequence of representatives converging almost everywhere to a representative of the limit; outside the countable union of the null sets on which those representatives differ from their indicators, is a pointwise limit of zeros and ones and therefore equals an indicator. Thus is complete and nonempty.
For define
Each is closed. Indeed, convergence of indicators means , and [L5] applied to the fixed gives for every . Also , because is a bounded functional by the endpoint Holder inequality in [L7], and hence weak nullity gives for each fixed .
Uniform integrability gives weakly compact truncation approximants. For the reverse implication assume is uniformly integrable and fix . By [L3] choose so that for all . The truncation is well defined on classes, measurable, and
Every belongs to and has norm at most . By [L6], is weakly compact. The inclusion satisfies by [L7] and is weak-to-weak continuous: if , [L7] writes for some ; finiteness of puts , so this is an -continuous functional. Therefore is weakly compact and .
Apply Baire to obtain one uniform tail neighborhood. The Baire theorem applied to the complete nonempty space and its closed cover gives , an indicator , and such that every indicator whose distance from is below belongs to .
Put the uniformly integrable family into a compact bidual closure. Uniform integrability gives a bound for , . Let in . Every satisfies : for , every weak-star neighborhood of meets , so by letting the neighborhood radius tend to zero. Hence . Banach--Alaoglu and [L9] make that ball weak-star compact; , being closed in it, is weak-star compact.
Derive uniform absolute continuity for every weakly null sequence. Fix a desired and run steps 2.2--3.1 with . If , put and . Both indicators are within of , so for ,
Apply this to and . Their measures are below , and the two signed integrals have absolute value at most , whence for . For the finitely many , [L5] supplies a common positive for which every corresponding integral is below . Thus implies for every : every weakly null sequence has uniformly absolutely continuous integrals.
Trap the bidual closure in compact neighborhoods of the canonical image. For each , the set is weak-star compact, because is weakly compact and is weak-to-weak-star continuous. The product is compact by [L9], and weak-star addition is continuous by [L8]. Hence
is weak-star compact and therefore weak-star closed in the Hausdorff weak-star space. Step 2.3 gives , so its weak-star closure satisfies for every .
Every weakly convergent sequence is uniformly integrable. If , then is weakly null. Step 4.1 gives uniform absolute continuity of , and [L4] gives norm boundedness. The individual function has absolutely continuous integral by [L5], so makes uniformly absolutely continuous as well. It is norm bounded by the triangle inequality. Thus [L3] makes the entire sequence uniformly integrable, including its finite initial segment.
Show that the compact bidual closure actually lies in . First is norm closed. Indeed, if is in its norm closure, AC chooses with . Isometry makes Cauchy; completeness of gives , and then .
Now let . From , AC chooses with . Hence belongs to the norm closure of , which is . Therefore .
Complete the relatively-weakly-compact-to-UI implication. Assume is relatively weakly compact. If its integrals were not uniformly absolutely continuous, AC would supply , , and with but . By [L4], a subsequence converges weakly. Step 5.1 makes that subsequence uniformly integrable and hence uniformly absolutely continuous by [L3]. But makes , contradicting the displayed lower bound. Thus is uniformly absolutely continuous; step 2.1 supplies norm boundedness, so [L3] makes uniformly integrable.
Complete the UI-to-relatively-weakly-compact implication. Assume is uniformly integrable. Step 3.2 makes weak-star compact and step 5.2 puts it inside . Since is the weak-to-relative-weak-star homeomorphism of step 1.2, is weakly compact. Because ambient weak-star closure agrees with relative closure once , this inverse is exactly . Thus is relatively weakly compact in the sense of [L4].
Combine both directions and account for all boundaries. [A1, L3, step 1.3, step 6.1, step 6.2] Steps 6.1 and 6.2 prove the two implications; step 1.3 covers empty and null measure spaces. Zero truncation levels are unnecessary because uniform integrability permits positive , and arbitrary positive is retained in the bidual intersection argument. The theorem is specifically for real ; no complex-duality conclusion is silently used. AC is spent only as itemized in step 1.1 and for the explicit countable selections in the norm-boundedness argument, step 5.2, and step 6.1.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Topics in Real and Functional Analysis
- Gilles Pisier, Martingales in Banach Spaces
- Jeff Cheeger and Bruce Kleiner, On the differentiability of Lipschitz maps from metric measure spaces to Banach spaces
- Thomas J. Jech, The Axiom of Choice, §2.4
- Haim Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations