Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The total variation of an absolutely continuous signed or complex measure has density the absolute value of the Radon-Nikodym derivative

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let μ be a sigma-finite positive measure.

  1. If ν is a finite signed measure with ν≪μ and Radon-Nikodym derivative h=dν/dμ, then ∣ν∣(E)=∫E∣h∣ dμ(E∈A).
  2. If ν is a finite complex measure with ν≪μ and Radon-Nikodym derivative h=dν/dμ, then ∣ν∣(E)=∫E∣h∣ dμ(E∈A).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a sigma-finite positive measure μ and an absolutely continuous finite signed or finite complex measure ν.

[L1]

A real L1 density defines a finite signed measure whose total variation is the integral of its absolute value. (A real L^1 density defines a finite signed measure with its canonical Hahn and Jordan data)

[L2]

A complex L1 density defines a complex measure whose total variation is the integral of its modulus. (A complex L^1 density defines a complex measure whose total variation is |h| dmu)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L3

In the finite signed case, [L3] gives an integrable real-valued representative h of dν/dμ, and [L1] applied to that density yields exactly ∣ν∣(E)=∫E∣h∣ dμ(E∈A).

1.2L2L3

In the finite complex case, [L3] gives an integrable complex representative h of dν/dμ, and [L2] applied to that density yields the same formula ∣ν∣(E)=∫E∣h∣ dμ(E∈A).

2.1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the signed and complex clauses.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources