How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
On a sigma-finite measure space, every bounded linear functional on is integration against a unique function
Statement
Let be a sigma-finite measure space, let , and let be conjugate to . For every bounded linear functional there exists a unique such that Moreover,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A sigma-finite measure space , an exponent , its conjugate exponent , and a bounded linear functional on .
On a finite measure space, a bounded functional has an Radon-Nikodym density representing it on all of (The Radon-Nikodym density of a bounded functional belongs to ).
On a semifinite measure space, representing classes are unique (On a semifinite measure space, a representing function is unique).
Sigma-finiteness means there is an increasing exhaustion by measurable finite-measure sets, and every sigma-finite measure is semifinite (Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures).
For , the pairing functional has norm in the ranges treated here (The functional has norm ; for assume is semifinite).
Dominated convergence applies to integrable majorants (Dominated convergence).
Monotone convergence applies to increasing nonnegative measurable sequences (Monotone convergence for the integral).
Proof
By [L3], choose an increasing sequence of measurable sets with [L1, L3, given, choose, construct] and for every . For each , let be the bounded functional on defined by where is the extension of by outside . Then . Applying [L1] on , choose such that and .
If , then both and represent the same functional [L2, L3, step 1.1] on the finite measure space . Since finite measure implies semifinite, [L2] gives Therefore the local densities are compatible on overlaps.
Define a measurable function by setting almost everywhere on [L6, step 1.1, step 2.1, algebra] each . This is consistent by step 2.1. If , then so monotone convergence gives If , then for each there is a null set with on ; the union is null, and on . Hence in every case and .
Let and choose a representative . [L4, L5, step 1.1, step 3.1, given, construct] Set . Then and the right-hand side is integrable. Since pointwise, [L5] gives For each , step 1.1 gives By step 3.1 and [L4], the map is a bounded linear functional on . Taking limits in the last display yields So represents on all of .
Since , [L2, L3, L4, step 4.1] [L4] gives If also represents , then sigma-finite implies semifinite by [L3], so [L2] gives in . Thus the representing class is unique.
Depends on
- On a semifinite measure space, a representing $L^q$ function is unique
- On a finite-measure space, a bounded functional on $L^p$ defines a finite signed measure
- The measure defined by a bounded $L^p$ functional is absolutely continuous with respect to $\mu$
- On a finite-measure space, a bounded $L^p$ functional is integration against its Radon-Nikodym density
- The Radon-Nikodym density of a bounded $L^p$ functional belongs to $L^q$
- Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures
- Dominated convergence
- Monotone convergence for the integral
- The functional $\Lambda_g$ has norm $\|g\|_q$; for $q=\infty$ assume $\mu$ is semifinite
Used by
- Counting measure specializes the representation theorem to ℓᵖ and ℓ^q Corollary
- The Lᵖ norm is the supremum of pairings against unit L^q functions Corollary
- Orientation only: the dual-space phrasing of the concrete Lᵖ theorem Remark
- For 1 < p < ∞, the same representation theorem holds on arbitrary measure spaces Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Theorem 6.15 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard F. Bass, Real Analysis for Graduate Students, Theorem 15.11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory, Theorem 7.14 (standard reference, not scraped)