How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Banach Valued Integration and the Radon Nikodym Property — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Absolute Continuity and the Sharp Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
- Approximation and Compactness in C(K)
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach Alaoglu Goldstine and Krein Milman
- Banach Valued Integration and the Radon Nikodym Property
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Complete Metrizability, Čech-Completeness, and Baire Category
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Convergence: Nets and Filters
- Convex and Semicontinuous Functions on Rⁿ
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Differentiation of Monotone Functions and the Vitali Covering Theorem
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces Adjoint Operators and Annihilators
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Geometric Hahn Banach and Convex Separation
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Reflexivity and Eberlein Smulian
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Sequential Uniform Boundedness with Countable Choice
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Analytic Hahn Banach Theorem
- The Baire Principles of Functional Analysis
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Duality of Lᵖ and L^q
- The Exponential Function
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Radon Nikodym Theorem and Lebesgue Decomposition
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Weak and Weak Star Topologies
2 · Summary
Finite simple truncations calculate the Bochner integral of a countably valued function and the variation of its induced vector measure. In the opposite direction, the coordinate map into is weakly measurable because every functional sees only countably many coordinates, but its essential range remains uncountably separated and therefore cannot be strongly measurable.
The geometric examples place Hilbert spaces on the RNP side and calculate diameter two for every slice of the unit ball. They also distinguish the separable dual sequence space , which has RNP under AC, from the nonatomic function space , which does not, and separate this target property from the scalar Radon--Nikodym theorem.
Finally, Dunford--Pettis turns two elementary integral calculations into weak compactness tests: domination by one function gives a uniformly integrable family, while the norm-one spikes retain all their mass on shrinking sets and hence are neither uniformly integrable nor relatively weakly compact.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Bochner integral of a countably valued function
Example
Let be a measure space, let be a real or complex Banach space, let be pairwise disjoint measurable sets, and let be a sequence in such that
With the convention that the value is zero off , the pointwise sum
is Bochner integrable. Its integral, and more generally every restricted integral, is the absolutely convergent vector series
As in the simple-integral definition, a term with is zero even when .
Facts & Assumptions
Integrable Banach-valued simple functions have the stated finite-sum integral, and their integrals satisfy the norm inequality (Banach-valued simple function and integral, Bochner integral norm inequality).
A strongly measurable function with integrable norm is Bochner integrable, and its integral is the limit obtained from any defining -simple approximation (Bochner integrability criterion, Bochner-integrable function).
Monotone convergence calculates integrals of increasing nonnegative partial sums (Monotone convergence for the integral).
Verification
Given: the measure space, Banach space, disjoint sets, vectors, and finite weighted norm series in the Statement.
Form the finite simple approximants. For , put . If , the finiteness of the displayed series forces ; zero levels need no finite-measure hypothesis. Thus every is an integrable simple function in the precise sense of [L1]. Pairwise disjointness gives for every : at most one summand is nonzero at any point.
Calculate the scalar approximation error. Pointwise disjointness gives . Applying monotone convergence in [L3] to its finite partial sums yields
The same calculation with shows .
Establish Bochner integrability and identify the unrestricted integral. The everywhere simple convergence in step 1.1 proves strong measurability, and step 2.1 gives integrability of the norm. Hence [L2] makes Bochner integrable. Moreover, is a defining -simple approximation, so
This vector limit exists absolutely because the sum of the norms of its terms is the assumed finite scalar series; completeness of is used here.
Calculate every restricted integral and audit the boundary cases. [L1, L2, step 2.1, step 3.1] For measurable , the functions approximate in , since their error integral is at most the tail in step 2.1. The simple calculation from [L1] therefore gives . If , if every is empty, or if every , both sides are zero. A single nonzero level reduces to the defining simple-function formula. Infinite-measure zero levels cause no undefined product, while a nonzero level automatically has finite measure.
Weakly measurable need not be strongly measurable
Statement refuted
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Put , give it the trace of the Lebesgue sigma-algebra and restricted Lebesgue measure, and define
where is either or and the norm is the square root of the displayed supremum. For , let be the coordinate unit vector. Then the map
is weakly measurable but is not strongly measurable.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds, hence so does Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration).
Under Countable Choice, the Lebesgue sigma-algebra is complete, the unit interval has measure one, countable subsets of the line are null, and a countable union of countable sets is countable (Lebesgue measurable sets, the family , and the restricted set function , Assuming countable choice, is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and is a complete measure extending elementary volume, A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included, Every at most countable subset of is Lebesgue null; in particular , Countable unions of at most countable sets, assuming ).
On a complete measure space and under AC, strong measurability is equivalent to weak measurability plus an essentially separable range (Pettis measurability criterion for strong measurability, Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset).
A complete normed space is a Banach space (Banach space).
Counterexample
Given: AC and the displayed scalar field, interval, normed function space, and map.
Verify that the target is a Banach space. Finite-dimensional Cauchy--Schwarz gives the triangle inequality after taking the supremum over finite ; homogeneity and definiteness are immediate, so the displayed formula is a norm. If is Cauchy in this norm, then every coordinate sequence is Cauchy. Let . Given , choose such that for . For every finite , passage to the scalar limit gives . Taking the supremum shows with norm at most . Hence and , so [L3] makes Banach. This also proves directly that whenever .
Every scalar evaluation of the range has countable support. Fix and put . For a finite , apply to (with conjugation trivial over ) to obtain
and therefore . For each , the set is finite, since arbitrarily large finite subsets would violate this bound. The support of is , which is countable by [L1].
Prove weak measurability. The trace measure space on is complete: any subset of a trace-null set is an ambient subset of a Lebesgue-null set and hence is Lebesgue measurable by [L1]. For the fixed , the scalar function vanishes off the countable null support from step 2.1. The inverse image of an open scalar set is either a subset of that support or the complement of such a subset, according as the open set omits or contains zero. Completeness makes every such inverse image measurable. Since was arbitrary, is weakly measurable.
Rule out an essentially separable range. Suppose there were a null and a separable closed subspace containing every for . The set is uncountable: if it were countable, [L1] would make both it and null, contrary to . Let be an at most countable dense subset of . For each , assign the first member of a fixed enumeration of lying within of . The assignment is injective, because one point of cannot lie within that radius of two vectors at distance . This would make countable, a contradiction. Thus the range is not essentially separably valued.
Conclude failure of strong measurability and audit boundaries. [A1, L2, step 1.1, step 3.1, step 4.1] The trace measure is complete, is Banach, and step 3.1 proves weak measurability, but step 4.1 disproves the other necessary condition in [L2]. Hence is not strongly measurable. Every coordinate vector has norm one; the zero functional has empty support and gives the constant zero scalar map; the real and complex cases are both covered by the finite coefficient calculation. The positive-measure interval, rather than a singleton or a null domain, is essential to the failed conclusion. AC is used through [L1], [L2], and the displayed simultaneous countability arguments only.
Vector measure induced by an L-one function
Example
Let be a measure space, let be a real or complex Banach space, and let be Bochner integrable. Then
is a norm-countably additive -valued measure, satisfies , and has variation
In particular, if for pairwise disjoint measurable and , then
Facts & Assumptions
A Bochner density induces an absolutely continuous vector measure whose variation has density equal to its pointwise norm (A Bochner density defines an absolutely continuous vector measure).
Finite Banach-valued simple integrals have their defining finite-sum formula; monotone convergence calculates scalar norm tails; and the Bochner criterion and definition identify the integral of an -simple limit (Banach-valued simple function and integral, Monotone convergence for the integral, Bochner integrability criterion, Bochner-integrable function).
Verification
Given: the measure space, Banach target, and Bochner density in the first claim, and the disjoint countably valued data in the special case.
Obtain the vector-measure conclusions. Apply [L1] to . It gives norm countable additivity of , absolute continuity with respect to , and the equality for every measurable . This is an equality of finite positive measures, not merely an upper estimate on .
Calculate the countably valued special case. Put . These are integrable simple functions and converge pointwise to . Pairwise disjointness and monotone convergence in [L2] give , so [L2] makes Bochner integrable. Restricting the same approximation to and using the finite simple formula gives . Also pointwise, so [L1] and the same scalar monotone-convergence calculation give .
Audit the examples at the boundaries. [L1, L2, step 1.1, step 2.1] For both measures vanish. For , the induced vector measure and its variation are both zero. With one nonzero level the two formulas read and , exhibiting equality even when cancellation would make the norm of a multi-level vector sum smaller. A zero coefficient on an infinite-measure level contributes zero under the established simple-integral convention.
Hilbert spaces have the Radon--Nikodym property
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every real or complex Hilbert space has the Radon--Nikodym property.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds and implies the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration).
Under Countable Choice, every complete real or complex inner-product space is reflexive (Hilbert spaces are reflexive by Riesz representation).
Under AC, every real or complex reflexive Banach space has the Radon--Nikodym property (Reflexive spaces have the Radon--Nikodym property).
Verification
Given: AC and a real or complex Hilbert space .
Propagate the choice assumption to the reflexivity supplier. By [A1], the assumed AC supplies the Countable Choice required by [L1]. No separate choice assumption is introduced.
Pass from Hilbert structure to RNP. A Hilbert space is complete for its inner-product norm, so [L1] makes reflexive. It is therefore a reflexive Banach space, and [L2], under the same AC hypothesis, gives the Radon--Nikodym property.
Audit the scope and degenerate cases. [A1, L1, L2, step 1.1, step 2.1] The argument applies to both real and complex scalar fields and to Hilbert spaces of arbitrary dimension and separability. For the zero Hilbert space, reflexivity and RNP are included in the two suppliers and the density condition is vacuous at zero vector measures. Completeness is essential to the word ``Hilbert'' here; no assertion is made for an incomplete inner-product space. The only choice propagation is AC to Countable Choice in step 1.1 and AC into [L2].
The closed unit ball of c-zero is not dentable
Statement refuted
Over either or , every slice of the closed unit ball has norm diameter exactly two. Consequently is not dentable.
Facts & Assumptions
The real and complex sequence spaces carry the supremum norm and are Banach spaces (The sequence spaces c_0 and ell-infinity, Real and complex are Banach).
Every functional on has a unique bilinear representation with , and finite truncations of converge in (The continuous dual of c0 is ell-one, Finite truncations approximate null and summable sequences).
Slices in a complex space use real parts, and dentability asks for slices of arbitrarily small norm diameter (Dentable bounded set and slice).
Counterexample
Given: one scalar field and the closed unit ball .
Fix an arbitrary slice with a strict margin. Let be a slice. By [L2], write . One has : the upper bound is the dual-norm inequality, while multiplying any almost norming vector by a scalar of modulus one makes its value real and nonnegative. Choose and set
Construct two points in the slice at distance two. The truncation convergence in [L2] implies , so take with . Retain all coordinates of except put and . A one-coordinate change preserves convergence to zero, and , so . Moreover,
and the identical estimate using puts in . Their th coordinates differ by two, hence .
Compute the diameter and deduce nondentability. The triangle inequality bounds the diameter of , and thus of , above by two. Step 2.1 attains two, so every slice has diameter exactly two. In particular no slice has diameter below one, and [L3] says that is not dentable. The set is nonempty, bounded, closed, and convex in the Banach space from [L1].
Audit zero, strict-boundary, and complex cases. [L2, L3, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 3.1] If , then the slice is all of and are direct witnesses. For nonzero , the positive and strict inequality keep both witnesses inside the slice rather than only on its boundary; a zero remote coefficient is harmless. In the complex case [L2] uses the bilinear pairing and [L3] uses , so no conjugation is inserted. A singleton zero ball is not involved: contains every .
Sequence ell-one versus nonatomic L-one for the RNP
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Over either or , the sequence space has the Radon--Nikodym property, whereas the nonatomic function space does not. Thus the notation ``one'' in the two norms does not determine the RNP.
Facts & Assumptions
AC holds and supplies Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration).
Finite truncations are dense in , while rational numbers are countable and dense in the reals; finite products and countable unions of countable sets are countable under Countable Choice (Finite truncations approximate null and summable sequences, is countably infinite, Both and are dense in , and every nonempty open subset of is uncountable, A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable, Countable unions of at most countable sets, assuming , A nonempty set is at most countable iff it is a surjective image of , Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset).
The bilinear coefficient map identifies isometrically with the continuous dual , and continuous duals are Banach (The continuous dual of c0 is ell-one, If (Y) is Banach then (\mathcal B(X,Y)) is Banach).
Under AC, every norm-separable continuous dual has RNP (Separable dual spaces have the Radon--Nikodym property).
Under AC, real and complex fail RNP ( fails the Radon--Nikodym property).
Proof
Given: AC and either scalar field.
Verify norm separability of the sequence space. Over , let be the finite-support sequences with rational coordinates; over , use coordinates in . For each support length the coordinate choices form a finite product of countable sets, and the union over all lengths is countable by [L1]. Given and , first choose a finite truncation within in , then approximate its finitely many coordinates so that the sum of coordinate errors is below . Thus is countable and dense, and is norm separable.
Put the sequence-space side under the separable-dual theorem. By [L2], is isometrically the continuous dual and is Banach. Step 1.1 supplies norm separability, so [L3], under the assumed AC, gives RNP to .
Contrast the nonatomic function space and audit scope. [A1, L4, step 2.1] The theorem [L4] gives the opposite conclusion for the real and complex Lebesgue quotient spaces . This is not a contradiction: consists of summable scalar sequences and is the separable dual , whereas the second space is built over a nonatomic measure and has the explicit nondifferentiable indicator curve used in [L4]. The zero sequence and zero function occur in both spaces but do not determine a global geometric property. Both scalar fields are covered, and AC is propagated to [L3] and [L4], with Countable Choice used in the countability calculation of step 1.1.
The RNP is not the scalar Radon--Nikodym theorem
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. The scalar Radon--Nikodym theorem is a theorem about absolutely continuous signed measures and scalar measurable densities. The Radon--Nikodym property is instead an additional property of a Banach target: it requires every norm-countably additive vector measure of bounded variation, absolutely continuous with respect to a finite scalar measure, to have a Bochner-integrable density. The scalar theorem proves the real scalar special case, but it does not prove that an arbitrary Banach space has RNP.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).
Under AC, the scalar Radon--Nikodym theorem gives a measurable real density to an absolutely continuous signed measure under its stated common finite-exhaustion hypotheses; finite total variation makes that density integrable (A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density).
For a scalar measure represented by , total variation is represented by (The total variation of an absolutely continuous signed or complex measure has density the absolute value of the Radon-Nikodym derivative).
RNP quantifies over Banach-valued norm-countably additive measures of bounded variation and asks for Bochner densities on every measurable set (Radon--Nikodym property, Banach-valued vector measure and variation).
Proof
Given: AC and the two stated Radon--Nikodym assertions.
Isolate what the scalar theorem supplies. For a real signed measure satisfying [L1]'s common finite-exhaustion hypotheses, [L1] supplies a scalar measurable with for every measurable . When has finite variation, , and [L2] identifies . Thus existence, uniqueness up to almost-everywhere equality, and scalar variation all live inside the ordered scalar theory.
Compare the vector quantifiers and density notion. For a Banach target , [L3] begins with a norm-countably additive map , not a signed scalar measure. Its bounded variation is the supremum of sums of vector norms over finite partitions. The requested density is an -valued strongly measurable, norm-integrable Bochner function, and its integral must recover for every . None of these target-valued existence assertions follows merely by replacing absolute values with norms in step 1.1.
Locate the overlap without overclaiming. When , a norm-countably additive vector measure is a signed measure, bounded variation is finite scalar total variation, and scalar measurability/integrability is the real Bochner notion. On a finite control measure the constant exhaustion meets [L1], so the scalar theorem supplies this special RNP case, with [L2] supplying its variation formula. For a general , [L3] remains a genuine extra geometric requirement.
Audit the boundaries and assumptions. [A1, L1, L3, step 3.1] The empty measurable space and zero scalar measure give zero densities in both settings. The zero Banach target has RNP trivially, but this says nothing about nonzero targets. The cited scalar theorem is real; no complex scalar theorem is silently extracted from it. Its sigma-finite-style common exhaustion is more general than the finite control measures in the RNP definition, while finite variation is what makes its scalar density . AC is stated because [L1] requires it.
Dunford--Pettis: dominated and concentrating families
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice, and let carry restricted Lebesgue measure. Two contrasting families in real are as follows.
- If is nonnegative and , then is uniformly integrable and relatively weakly compact.
- The concentrating sequence , , is bounded in but is neither uniformly integrable nor relatively weakly compact.
Facts & Assumptions
AC holds and supplies Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration).
Under Countable Choice, Lebesgue measure is complete and intervals have their lengths; restriction to a measurable set is again a measure (Lebesgue measurable sets, the family , and the restricted set function , Assuming countable choice, is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and is a complete measure extending elementary volume, A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included, Restriction of a measure to a measurable set, The restriction of a measure to a measurable set is a measure).
Real consists of almost-everywhere classes with the integral norm, and the integral of a nonnegative simple function is its finite weighted sum (The space as the quotient by null functions, The norm descends to the quotient and makes a normed space for , The integral of a nonnegative simple function).
Every individual function has absolutely continuous integral (Absolute continuity of the integral).
Under AC, a family in real on a finite measure space is relatively weakly compact exactly when it is uniformly integrable, equivalently norm bounded with uniformly absolutely continuous integrals (Dunford--Pettis for real on a finite measure space).
Verification
Given: AC, the restricted Lebesgue interval, a nonnegative , a dominated family , and the displayed spike sequence.
Fix the finite quotient-space model. Let on the ambient Lebesgue sigma-algebra. By [L1] this is a finite measure with . We use the quotient from [L2], so changes outside or on null endpoints do not change a class.
Prove uniform integrability of the dominated family. For , domination gives , uniformly in . Given , [L3] supplies such that implies . Then for every . Thus the two conditions in [L4] hold, so is uniformly integrable and relatively weakly compact.
Calculate the concentrating sequence. For every , the nonnegative simple-integral formula and interval length give
Hence is bounded. But for one has while .
Fail uniform integrability and weak compactness. Taking, for example, , step 2.2 shows that no single works for the uniform absolute-continuity condition: choose . Therefore the family is not uniformly integrable. The reverse implication in [L4] then shows that it is not relatively weakly compact.
Audit the endpoints and degenerate families. [A1, L1, L2, L3, L4, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 2.2, step 3.1] If , both conclusions in part 1 are vacuous. If , every dominated class is zero, so the conclusion is the compact singleton case. Open, closed, or half-open spike intervals define the same class because their endpoint differences are null. The spikes are real and nonnegative; their obstruction is concentration on shrinking positive-measure sets, not unbounded norm. AC is used exactly through [L4] and to supply the Countable Choice in the Lebesgue model [L1].