Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

L1[0,1] fails the Radon--Nikodym property

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. The real and complex Banach spaces L1([0,1],λ) for nonatomic Lebesgue measure do not have the Radon--Nikodym property.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).

[L3]
[L5]

Under AC, a Banach space has RNP exactly when all its Lipschitz curves on [0,1] are norm differentiable almost everywhere (RNP and almost-everywhere differentiability of Lipschitz curves).

Proof

technique · counterexample

Given: AC and either the real or complex scalar field.

1.1

Fix the precise L1[0,1] model. Let λ[0,1](E)=λ(E[0,1]) on the Lebesgue sigma-algebra of R. By [L1]--[L2] this is a finite measure. We use L1(λ[0,1]) as the same-ambient realization of L1([0,1],λ): values outside [0,1] have zero seminorm. The real space is Banach by [L3], and the complex space is Banach by [L4]; [A1] supplies the Countable Choice required by the completeness results.

givenA1L1L2L3L4
2.1

Construct the Lipschitz curve. For 0t1, put F(t)=[1(0,t)]. Every representative is measurable and integrable. If 0s<t1, then

L1L3L4step 1.1construct

F(t)F(s)1=[1(s,t)]1=λ((s,t))=ts.

Thus F is an isometric, and in particular one-Lipschitz, curve in either the real or complex target.

3.1

Calculate two incompatible positive difference quotients. Fix t(0,1) and 0<h<1t. The positive difference quotient is

L1L3L4step 2.1algebra

qh:=F(t+h)F(t)h=[1h1(t,t+h)].

On (t,t+h/2) the difference qhqh/2 has absolute value 1/h, and on (t+h/2,t+h) it again has absolute value 1/h. It vanishes elsewhere up to endpoints. Consequently

qhqh/21=1hh2+1hh2=1.

4.1

Prove failure of differentiability at every interior point. Choose, for example, hn=(1t)/(n+2). If F(t) existed in norm, both qhn and qhn/2 would converge to it, so their mutual distances would tend to zero. Step 3.1 says every one of those distances is one, a contradiction. Hence F is norm nondifferentiable at every t(0,1).

step 3.1
5.1

Apply the Lipschitz characterization and close the boundary cases. [A1, L5, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 4.1] If either L1 target had RNP, [L5] would make the one-Lipschitz curve F norm differentiable at almost every interior point, contrary to step 4.1. Thus both targets fail RNP. Endpoint values cause no issue: F(0)=0 and F(1)=[1(0,1)], while differentiability is asserted only on the interior. Open, closed, or half-open versions of the intervals define the same L1 classes because their endpoint differences are null. The complex proof uses the same real-valued representatives inside complex L1. AC is used through [L5] and to supply the Countable Choice in step 1.1.

A1L1L5step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

91 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources