Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sequence ell-one versus nonatomic L-one for the RNP

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Over either R or C, the sequence space 1 has the Radon--Nikodym property, whereas the nonatomic function space L1([0,1],λ) does not. Thus the notation ``one'' in the two norms does not determine the RNP.

Facts & Assumptions

[L2]

The bilinear coefficient map identifies 1 isometrically with the continuous dual c0, and continuous duals are Banach (The continuous dual of c0 is ell-one, If (Y) is Banach then (\mathcal B(X,Y)) is Banach).

[L3]

Under AC, every norm-separable continuous dual has RNP (Separable dual spaces have the Radon--Nikodym property).

[L4]

Under AC, real and complex L1([0,1],λ) fail RNP (L1[0,1] fails the Radon--Nikodym property).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: AC and either scalar field.

1.1

Verify norm separability of the sequence space. Over R, let D be the finite-support sequences with rational coordinates; over C, use coordinates in Q+iQ. For each support length the coordinate choices form a finite product of countable sets, and the union over all lengths is countable by [L1]. Given a1 and ε>0, first choose a finite truncation within ε/2 in 1, then approximate its finitely many coordinates so that the sum of coordinate errors is below ε/2. Thus D is countable and dense, and 1 is norm separable.

A1L1
2.1

Put the sequence-space side under the separable-dual theorem. By [L2], 1 is isometrically the continuous dual c0 and is Banach. Step 1.1 supplies norm separability, so [L3], under the assumed AC, gives RNP to 1.

A1L2L3step 1.1
3.1

Contrast the nonatomic function space and audit scope. [A1, L4, step 2.1] The theorem [L4] gives the opposite conclusion for the real and complex Lebesgue quotient spaces L1([0,1],λ). This is not a contradiction: 1 consists of summable scalar sequences and is the separable dual c0, whereas the second space is built over a nonatomic measure and has the explicit nondifferentiable indicator curve used in [L4]. The zero sequence and zero function occur in both spaces but do not determine a global geometric property. Both scalar fields are covered, and AC is propagated to [L3] and [L4], with Countable Choice used in the countability calculation of step 1.1.

givenA1L1L2L3L4step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources