How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
RNP is separably determined
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. A Banach space has RNP if and only if every closed separable subspace of has RNP.
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).
RNP is the bounded-variation vector-measure density property (Radon--Nikodym property).
Under AC, RNP is equivalent to dentability of every nonempty bounded closed convex set (RNP--dentability characterization).
Under AC, nondentability supplies a density-free Lebesgue vector measure whose range lies in a closed separable subspace (Nondentability produces a vector measure without density).
A bounded linear inclusion preserves Bochner integrability and commutes with integration (Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration).
Proof
Given: A Banach space and AC.
Transfer dentability to a closed subspace. Assume has RNP and let be a closed separable subspace. Any nonempty bounded closed convex is also closed in . By [L2] it has arbitrarily small slices determined by functionals in . Restricting such a functional to gives the same slice of , including the zero-functional singleton case. Thus every such is dentable in .
Conclude the forward implication. Apply the reverse direction of [L2] inside to conclude that has RNP. Hence RNP passes to every closed separable subspace.
Obtain the separable-range witness for the converse. Now assume every closed separable subspace of has RNP. If failed RNP, [L2] would give a nondentable bounded closed convex set, and [L3] would yield an absolutely continuous bounded-variation vector measure on with no -valued density and with range in a closed separable subspace .
Use the subspace density to contradict the witness. Regarded as a -valued measure, has the same variation and absolute continuity. By the assumed RNP of and [L1], it has a Bochner density . The isometric inclusion is bounded; [L4] gives in , contradicting step 3.1.
Combine both directions and record boundaries. [A1, step 2.1, step 4.1] Steps 2.1 and 4.1 prove the equivalence. The zero subspace is closed and separable and has its zero density; if both sides hold. The full-AC cost is precisely that inherited from [L2] and [L3].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gilles Pisier, Martingales in Banach Spaces (standard reference, not scraped)