Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

RNP is separably determined

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. A Banach space X has RNP if and only if every closed separable subspace of X has RNP.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice holds (The Axiom of Choice).

[L1]

RNP is the bounded-variation vector-measure density property (Radon--Nikodym property).

[L2]

Under AC, RNP is equivalent to dentability of every nonempty bounded closed convex set (RNP--dentability characterization).

[L3]

Under AC, nondentability supplies a density-free Lebesgue vector measure whose range lies in a closed separable subspace (Nondentability produces a vector measure without density).

[L4]

A bounded linear inclusion preserves Bochner integrability and commutes with integration (Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: A Banach space X and AC.

1.1

Transfer dentability to a closed subspace. Assume X has RNP and let YX be a closed separable subspace. Any nonempty bounded closed convex CY is also closed in X. By [L2] it has arbitrarily small slices determined by functionals in X. Restricting such a functional to Y gives the same slice of C, including the zero-functional singleton case. Thus every such C is dentable in Y.

givenA1L2
2.1

Conclude the forward implication. Apply the reverse direction of [L2] inside Y to conclude that Y has RNP. Hence RNP passes to every closed separable subspace.

A1L2step 1.1
3.1

Obtain the separable-range witness for the converse. Now assume every closed separable subspace of X has RNP. If X failed RNP, [L2] would give a nondentable bounded closed convex set, and [L3] would yield an absolutely continuous bounded-variation vector measure ν on [0,1] with no X-valued density and with range in a closed separable subspace Y.

A1L1L2L3step 2.1
4.1

Use the subspace density to contradict the witness. Regarded as a Y-valued measure, ν has the same variation and absolute continuity. By the assumed RNP of Y and [L1], it has a Bochner density h:[0,1]Y. The isometric inclusion i:YX is bounded; [L4] gives ν(E)=i(Eh)=Eih in X, contradicting step 3.1.

L1L4step 3.1
5.1

Combine both directions and record boundaries. [A1, step 2.1, step 4.1] Steps 2.1 and 4.1 prove the equivalence. The zero subspace is closed and separable and has its zero density; if X={0} both sides hold. The full-AC cost is precisely that inherited from [L2] and [L3].

A1step 2.1step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources