Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two real-analytic functions on an open interval that agree on a set with an accumulation point in that interval agree throughout the interval

Statement

Let IRI\subseteq\mathbb R be an open interval and let f,g:IRf,g:I\to\mathbb R be real analytic. If the agreement set {xI:f(x)=g(x)}\{x\in I:f(x)=g(x)\} has an accumulation point cc lying inside II, then f=gf=g throughout II.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The interval, functions, agreement set, and interior accumulation point in the statement.

[L1]

Subtracting local power-series representations shows directly that h:=fgh:=f-g is real analytic (A real-analytic function on an open subset of R\mathbb{R} is locally represented by a convergent real power series).

[L2]

At a zero of a real-analytic function, the zero is isolated unless the function vanishes on a neighbourhood (At a zero of a real-analytic function, either some first nonzero coefficient makes the zero isolated or every local coefficient vanishes).

[L3]

Every interval is connected: it has no decomposition into two nonempty separated sets, where each set must avoid the closure of the other (A subset of R\mathbb{R} is connected if and only if it is order-convex, that is, an interval, Separated sets, disconnection, and connected subset of R\mathbb{R}).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put h:=fgh:=f-g. By [L1], hh is real analytic. The accumulating zeros and [L4] give h(c)=0h(c)=0, and this zero is not isolated; hence [L2] makes hh identically zero on a neighbourhood of cc.

givenL1L2L4
2.1

Let VV be the set of points of II having a neighbourhood in II on which hh vanishes. Step 1.1 makes VV nonempty, and its definition makes it relatively open.

step 1.1
3.1

The complement IVI\setminus V is also relatively open. Indeed, if h(x)0h(x)\ne0, continuity gives a neighbourhood containing no zero and hence no point of VV; if h(x)=0h(x)=0 but xVx\notin V, [L2] makes xx an isolated zero, and a sufficiently small neighbourhood again contains no point of VV.

step 2.1L2L4
4.1

Steps 2.1 and 3.1 make VV and IVI\setminus V separated: every point of either set has a real neighbourhood disjoint from the other, so neither set meets the closure of the other. If IVI\setminus V were nonempty, they would therefore disconnect the connected interval II, contrary to [L3]. Thus V=IV=I and h=0h=0 throughout II, so f=gf=g.

step 2.1step 3.1L3

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 69 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources