How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
L2 almost orthogonality of the dyadic pieces
Statement
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). For every , In particular . The constants and depend on no parameter beyond the fixed partition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the fixed partition and operators of The inhomogeneous dyadic frequency partition and its Littlewood-Paley operators; a function ; the Plancherel isometry and the complex conventions of Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions.
Each satisfies , the pointwise bounds with a locally finite sum, and for the function lies in with (Existence of a smooth inhomogeneous dyadic frequency partition, The inhomogeneous dyadic frequency partition and its Littlewood-Paley operators).
Plancherel: is a surjective isometry preserving the first-variable-linear inner product, so and (Plancherel theorem).
The multiplier by a symbol with that belongs to extends uniquely from to a bounded operator on of norm at most , given by (Exact L2 Fourier multiplier norm).
For and , the convolution representative lies in with , the constant being uniform in (Young's convolution inequality under Countable Choice, Dyadic pieces have annular Fourier support and uniformly bounded rescaled kernels).
The smooth compactly supported functions are dense in (Complex finite-simple and smooth compact-support density for finite p): there is a sequence with in .
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on sigma-finite products, in particular for summation in a discrete index against Lebesgue measure (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).
Proof
The Schwartz case. Let . For every , [F1] gives with ; by Plancherel [F2] applied to and to , and .
Summing the Schwartz identity. With as in step 1.1, the series is locally finite with pointwise by [F1], so Tonelli's theorem [F6] applied to the nonnegative functions gives , and the pointwise bounds sandwich this between and . This proves the two-sided estimate, and the finiteness of , for Schwartz .
The identity passes to . For both maps and are bounded linear operators on by [F3] and [F4], and they agree on the dense subspace by step 1.1 and [F3]; given and a sequence with from [F5], both operators applied to converge in to their values at , so and hence for every .
Conclusion. For , step 2.2 gives for every , and Tonelli [F6] then gives ; the pointwise bounds and from Plancherel [F2] yield , which is the stated two-sided estimate, and the finiteness of the sum.
Depends on
- The inhomogeneous dyadic frequency partition and its Littlewood-Paley operators
- Existence of a smooth inhomogeneous dyadic frequency partition
- Dyadic pieces have annular Fourier support and uniformly bounded rescaled kernels
- Plancherel theorem
- Exact L2 Fourier multiplier norm
- Young's convolution inequality under Countable Choice
- Complex finite-simple and smooth compact-support density for finite p
- Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
76 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed. (Springer GTM 249) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Terence Tao, Math 247A Lecture Notes 4 (UCLA, Fall 2006) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mark Williams, Notes on Harmonic Analysis (January 11, 2022) (standard reference, not scraped)