Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Newtonian potentials solve the distributional Poisson equation

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and n≥2. Let f∈L1(Rn) be compactly supported, meaning that it has a representative which vanishes outside a compact set. Then Nf is finite almost everywhere, belongs to Lloc1(Rn), and depends only on the L1 equivalence class of f. Its regular distribution satisfies −ΔTNf=Tfin D′(Rn). The result includes Cc data and compactly supported Lp data for every 1≤p≤∞. If f=0 almost everywhere outside a closed compact set K, then Nf is smooth and harmonic on Rn∖K.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, n≥2, a compact set K⊆Rn, and an L1 equivalence class with a representative vanishing outside K. Write λn for Lebesgue measure and βn for its restriction to B(Rn).

[A1]

Countable Choice, written ACω, means every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

The kernel has the normalized power formula for n≥3 and logarithmic formula for n=2, with its pole value chosen finitely. Its class is locally integrable. (Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian, Local integrability of the Laplace fundamental kernel)

[F2]

Lebesgue measure is the completion of βn; under ACω, a completed-measurable function has a Borel representative equal to it almost everywhere. (L(Rn) is exactly the completion of the restriction of λn to the Borel sets, The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space, A function measurable for a completion is almost everywhere equal to one measurable for the original sigma-algebra)

[F3]

For Borel functions a,b, (x,y)↦a(x−y)b(y) is Borel on R2n; B(R2n)=B(Rn)⊗B(Rn). (Borel representatives make the convolution integrand Borel measurable, The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates, The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n})

[F5]

Tonelli gives measurable section integrals for nonnegative product-measurable functions; Fubini exchanges the iterated integrals of an L1 product function. (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product)

[F7]

A test function is smooth with compact support; locally integrable functions define regular distributions, and Countable Choice gives the Lloc1-to-distribution embedding. Distributional derivatives act on tests by the signed test derivative. (Test function space d of an open set, Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Locally integrable functions embed in distributions, Distributional derivative)

[F10]

The kernel is smooth and harmonic away from its pole. Differentiation may be passed under an integral with a common integrable derivative bound, and dominated convergence gives continuity of the resulting derivative integrals. (The Laplace fundamental solution is harmonic off its pole, Differentiation under the integral sign, Dominated convergence)

[F12]

The point-source identity is −ΔxTΦ(⋅−y)=δy for every y. (The negative Laplacian of the fundamental solution is the unit Dirac distribution)

[F13]

The Newton potential is the integral convolution at every point where the absolute integral is finite. (Newtonian potential of compactly supported data)

[F14]

Bounded compactly supported data have an everywhere-finite potential, independent of their finite-valued representative. (Bounded compact data give an everywhere finite Newtonian potential)

[F15]

For any measure μ and measurable sets Ek, μ(⋃kEk)≤∑kμ(Ek). In particular a countable union of measurable λn-null sets is null, since the right side is zero. (Finite and countable subadditivity of measures)

[F16]

Arithmetic operations on measurable functions preserve measurability; continuous maps have Borel preimages. (Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined, A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1F1F2F3F4F16construct

Choose a finite-valued representative f0 vanishing outside K. By [F2] and [A1], apply the completed-measurable representative theorem separately to the real and imaginary parts of f0, reset any nonfinite exceptional values to zero, and combine them using [F16] to obtain a finite Borel representative equal to f0 almost everywhere. Reset it to zero off K and call it f~. Set Φ(0)=0; its displayed radial formula is continuous away from the singleton pole, so it is Borel. By [F3], H(x,y)=Φ(x−y)f~(y) is Borel, hence product-measurable for βn⊗βn. The open balls B(0,m) are Borel and exhaust Rn; they have finite βn-measure by [F4], so βn is sigma-finite.

1.2F4F8F11F14cases

For compactly supported Lp data with 1<p<∞, Hölder [F8] on the finite-measure set K gives ∫K∣f∣≤∥f∥p∥1K∥q=∥f∥pλn(K)1/q<∞, where 1/p+1/q=1. The case p=1 is immediate, and the endpoint p=∞ uses the endpoint clause of [F8]; moreover the bounded-data result [F14] gives everywhere absolute convergence there. A continuous compactly supported g∈Cc is bounded on its compact support by [F11], whose measure is finite by [F4], so it too belongs to L1. This verifies the stated Cc and full 1≤p≤∞ inclusions.

2.1F4F9F13casesstep 1.1

The compact set K is closed and bounded, hence Borel, and has finite λn-measure by [F4]. If K=∅ or λn(K)=0, then f~ vanishes off a null set, so [F9] gives Nf(x)=0 with absolute convergence for every x; the L1 class is zero. Assume henceforth K≠∅ and choose R>0 with K⊂B(0,R).

2.2F1F9F13F16algebrastep 1.1

If g is any other finite-valued measurable representative of the same L1 class, then for each fixed x the functions y↦Φ(x−y)g(y) and y↦Φ(x−y)f~(y) agree outside a null set; their absolute values are measurable by [F16]. For nonnegative measurable functions agreeing off a null set, split each integral over that set and its complement; [F9] shows the two extended absolute integrals agree. Thus absolute finiteness is equivalent for the two representatives. When finite, their difference is integrable with integral zero by [F9], so linearity gives equal potential values. The pole assignment also changes the integrand only on the null singleton {x}. Therefore Nf depends only on the L1 class, with equality at every point where the integrals are defined.

3.1F1F4F6F8algebrastep 2.1

Fix an integer m≥1 and y∈K. For x∈B(0,m), the Euclidean triangle inequality gives x−y∈B(0,m+R). Translation by −y preserves Lebesgue integrals by [F6], so ∫B(0,m)∣Φ(x−y)∣ dx=∫B(0,m)−y∣Φ(z)∣ dz≤∫B(0,m+R)∣Φ(z)∣ dz=:Cm,R<∞, where finiteness follows from [F1] and the last inequality from [F8].

3.2F2F4F9F10F11F13step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Let x0∉K. If K=∅, then Nf=0 and the claim holds. Otherwise, since K is closed, choose r>0 such that B(x0,2r)∩K=∅. For x∈B‾(x0,r) and y∈K, the triangle inequality and boundedness of K give r≤∣x−y∣≤M for some finite M. Choose y0∈K. Since B(x0,2r)∩K=∅, ∣x0−y0∣≥2r>r and the upper bound gives ∣x0−y0∣≤M, so x0−y0∈A:={z:r≤∣z∣≤M} and A is nonempty. The annulus A is closed because the norm is continuous [F11] and [r,M] is closed; it is bounded by M, hence compact. Every continuous derivative DαΦ is therefore bounded on A [F11]. Thus for each multi-index α there is Cα<∞ with ∣DαΦ(x−y)f~(y)∣≤Cα∣f~(y)∣1K(y). The majorant is integrable since f~=f almost everywhere and ∫K∣f~∣=∥f∥1<∞ by [F2, F9]. Applying differentiation under the integral sign coordinate by coordinate on a small box about x0, and dominated convergence for continuity of each derivative, proves Nf∈C∞ near x0. Since ΔxΦ(x−y)=0 for x≠y by [F10], differentiating twice yields ΔNf(x)=0 there. Therefore Nf is smooth and harmonic on Rn∖K.

4.1step 3.1F2F4F5F9F16algebrastep 1.1

Apply Tonelli [F5] to the nonnegative Borel function ∣H(x,y)∣1B(0,m)(x)1K(y). Using step 3.1 gives ∫B(0,m)∫K∣Φ(x−y)f~(y)∣ dy dx≤Cm,R∫K∣f~(y)∣ dy=Cm,R∥f∥L1<∞, where the last equality uses [F2, F9] because f~=f almost everywhere and βn completes to λn. Thus the complex function H is in L1(B(0,m)×K) for every m.

5.1step 4.1F2F4F5F8F13F15

Fubini [F5] on each such product shows that for almost every x∈B(0,m) the section y↦H(x,y)1K(y) is absolutely integrable, and its integral is an L1(B(0,m)) function with integral of its absolute value at most the finite bound in step 4.1, by the integral triangle inequality [F8]. These section integrals agree with Nf(x) wherever absolutely finite by [F13]. The balls B(0,m) exhaust Rn, so, writing Em for the measurable exceptional set in B(0,m), [F15] gives λn(⋃m≥1Em)≤∑m≥1λn(Em)=0. Thus Nf is finite almost everywhere on all of Rn; assign it value zero on this null set. Each compact set lies in some B(0,m) by [F4], proving Nf∈Lloc1(Rn).

6.1F2F3F5F7F9F11F12F13F16step 4.1step 1.1step 5.1

Let φ∈D(Rn) and choose m with supp⁡φ⊂B(0,m). The function H(x,y)=Φ(x−y)f~(y) is Borel by [F3]. The pullback of the Borel function −Δφ by the first-coordinate projection is Borel: the preimage of a Borel set E is E×Rn, which belongs to the product sigma-algebra and hence to the Euclidean Borel sigma-algebra by [F3]. The test function is smooth, so Δφ is continuous; [F16] gives its Borel measurability. Thus G(x,y)=H(x,y)(−Δφ(x)) is Borel by [F16]. Since Δφ is bounded and compactly supported, step 4.1 shows G is integrable on the product. Fubini therefore gives ∫RnNf(x)(−Δφ(x)) dx=∫Kf~(y)(∫RnΦ(x−y)(−Δφ(x)) dx)dy. The inner integral is φ(y) by the translated point-source identity [F12]. Hence the right side is ∫Kf~(y)φ(y) dy.

7.1F7step 5.1step 6.1

By [F7], step 6.1 is exactly ⟨−ΔTNf,φ⟩=⟨Tf,φ⟩ for every test φ. The locally integrable embedding makes both sides distributions, so they are equal in D′.

8.1A1F1F2F7F12step 2.1step 1.2cases∎

The logarithmic kernel at n=2 and power kernel at n≥3 are both covered by [F1], [F2] and [F12]; the distinct n=1 case is excluded by the statement. The zero source and empty or null support were handled in step 2.1; the Hölder endpoint cases p=1,∞ are explicit in step 1.2. Countable Choice is used to obtain a Borel representative, and is inherited by the published kernel identity and distribution embedding [F2, F7, F12]. No full Axiom of Choice or later result is used; the statement is not an iff.

Source notes

Schmidt §2.11, Remark (3), printed pp.70–71, proves the very weak pairing identity for compactly supported L∞ data by Fubini and the point-source calculation. Schmidt uses the opposite kernel sign, so FSchmidt=−Φ; the formula becomes −Δ(Nf)=f in the convention here. The argument above extends the source class to compactly supported L1 by the local uniform kernel bound, Tonelli and Fubini.

Hunter §2.7, Theorem 2.25 and proof, printed pp.34–36 (PDF pp.39–41), proves the pointwise equation for smooth compactly supported data. It does not state the present L1 theorem; its smooth-data proof is contextual only.

Teschl §5.3, equations (5.19)–(5.21) and Lemma 5.17, archived author manuscript printed pp.117–118, gives the convolution formula and proves harmonicity of integrals of harmonic kernels by Fubini and the mean-value property. The present off-support smoothness is derived from the local uniform derivative bound instead.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

214 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources