How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If , then exists almost everywhere, belongs to , and
Statement
Assume countable choice . If , then exists for almost every , belongs to , and satisfies
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice and functions .
Under countable choice, completed-Lebesgue measurable functions have Borel representatives almost everywhere ( is exactly the completion of the restriction of to the Borel sets, A function measurable for a completion is almost everywhere equal to one measurable for the original sigma-algebra, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Apply this to real and imaginary parts for complex functions.
The Borel-representative integrand is measurable and representative independent (Borel representatives make the convolution integrand Borel measurable, Convolution on is independent of the chosen Borel representatives).
Tonelli and Fubini apply on sigma-finite product spaces (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).
The integral triangle inequality is available (The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus).
Lebesgue measure is translation invariant, and nonnegative integrals are invariant under measure-preserving maps (Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation, Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps).
Proof
Use the stated countable choice and [L0] to choose Borel representatives of and define [L0, L1, L2, L4, given, choose, algebra] By [L1], is measurable on . For each , by [L4].
Integrating the identity from step 1.1 in and applying [L2] gives [L2, step 1.1, algebra] Hence for almost every , the section is absolutely integrable, so is defined there.
For those , [L1, L2, L3, step 2.1, algebra] by [L3]. Another application of [L2] then yields By [L1], the resulting class is independent of the chosen Borel representatives.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- $\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is exactly the completion of the restriction of $\lambda_n$ to the Borel sets
- A function measurable for a completion is almost everywhere equal to one measurable for the original sigma-algebra
- Borel representatives make the convolution integrand Borel measurable
- Convolution on $L^1(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is independent of the chosen Borel representatives
- Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation
- Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
- The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Walter Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis, 3rd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)