Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pointwise potential bound for compactly supported smooth functions

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let n≥2 and u∈Cc∞(Rn;K), K∈{R,C}. Then for every x∈Rn, ∣u(x)∣≤1σ(Sn−1)∫Rn∣Du(y)∣ ∣x−y∣1−n dy, where σ is the polar surface measure of The polar surface set function on the unit sphere and ∣Du∣ is the Euclidean norm of the gradient. In particular ∣u(x)∣≤C(n)∫Rn∣Du(y)∣ ∣x−y∣1−ndy.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; an integer n≥2; a field K∈{R,C}; a function u∈Cc∞(Rn;K); the polar surface measure σ on Sn−1; and a point x∈Rn.

[F2]

Polar coordinates: for every Borel measurable f:Rn→[0,∞], ∫Rnf dλn=∫0∞∫Sn−1f(rω)rn−1 dσ(ω) dr (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

[F4]

For a vector-valued differentiable f with integrable derivative, ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a) (If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz).

[F6]

Every Euclidean ball has positive finite Lebesgue measure: 0<λ(B(x,r))<∞ (Euclidean balls have positive finite Lebesgue measure).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F4givenalgebra

The radial primitive. Fix ω∈Sn−1 and put g(t):=u(x+tω) for t≥0. Since u is smooth and compactly supported, g is differentiable with g′(t)=Du(x+tω)⋅ω, and g(t)=0 for all t≥T once T is so large that x+[0,∞)ω leaves the support of u. Applying the fundamental theorem [F4] on [0,T] and letting T→∞ gives g(0)=−∫0∞g′(t) dt, hence ∣u(x)∣≤∫0∞∣Du(x+tω)∣ dt.

1.2F2F6algebra

Surface normalisation. By [F2] applied to 1B(0,1), λn(B(0,1))=σ(Sn−1)∫01tn−1dt=σ(Sn−1)/n. Thus [F6] gives 0<σ(Sn−1)=nλn(B(0,1))<∞.

1.3F2F3givenalgebra

Translation to polar coordinates at x. Define G(y):=∣Du(y)∣ ∣x−y∣1−n for y≠x and G(x):=0; this is Borel measurable because ∣Du∣ is continuous and y↦∣x−y∣1−n is Borel. Applying [F2] to the nonnegative Borel function z↦G(x+z) and then [F3] gives ∫Sn−1∫0∞∣Du(x+tω)∣ dt dσ(ω)=∫Sn−1∫0∞G(x+tω)tn−1 dt dσ(ω)=∫RnG(y) dy, where the first equality uses ∣x−(x+tω)∣1−n=t1−n and the two integrations are the iterated polar integral of the nonnegative function z↦G(x+z); the singularity at y=x is a single point and does not affect the value of the integral.

2.1F5F7step 1.1algebra

Integrating the pointwise bound over the sphere. The function (t,ω)↦∣Du(x+tω)∣ is continuous on [0,∞)×Sn−1, hence product measurable, and it is nonnegative; by Tonelli [F5] its iterated integral over the sigma-finite product [0,∞)×Sn−1 is well defined. Integrating the inequality of step 1.1 over Sn−1 against σ therefore gives ∣u(x)∣ σ(Sn−1)≤∫Sn−1∫0∞∣Du(x+tω)∣ dt dσ(ω).

3.1step 1.2step 2.1step 1.3algebra∎

Conclusion. Combining steps 2.1 and 1.3 with the positivity of σ(Sn−1) from step 1.2 gives ∣u(x)∣≤1σ(Sn−1)∫Rn∣Du(y)∣∣x−y∣1−n dy, and C(n):=1/σ(Sn−1)=1/(nλn(B(0,1))) is the asserted dimension-only constant.

Source notes

Kinnunen's Lemma 5.22 proves the corresponding oscillation bound on a ball by slicing spheres and changing variables; the proof above uses the same radial computation in the global polar-coordinate form suited to compactly supported functions, with the sphere average normalised by σ(Sn−1). Hunter's display (3.14) gives the related ball-averaged oscillation bound; the compact-support ray argument above gives the global estimate with 1/σ(Sn−1).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources