How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Morrey's inequality for
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let , , let be open and let . Then has a continuous representative , and for every ball with one has equivalently .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, used through the Countable-Choice interfaces of the cited measure-theoretic and approximation results; ; ; an open set ; a field ; and a class .
The ball oscillation estimate: for a ball and , for almost every (Ball-mean oscillation bound by the Riesz potential of the gradient).
Holder's inequality for conjugate exponents (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases), and with because , while by polar coordinates (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
The ball average is the normalized integral, and as for almost every (The average of a locally integrable function over a Euclidean ball, Lebesgue differentiation theorem on ).
consists of the classes with weak gradient in ; classes are determined up to null sets; for the local Holder norm is (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, The space as the quotient by null functions, Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls).
Countable Choice is available from the Axiom of Choice and is the hypothesis of the cited differentiation interface; the cited Holder theorem requires no choice hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Oscillation on a ball. Fix a ball . By [F1], for almost every , . Holder [F2] with exponents and bounds this by , where the integration region has been enlarged from to . By [F2] the kernel integral equals with and exponent , so for almost every .
Convergence of the ball means and the representative. Fix a ball with and let . For almost every step 1.1 applied on gives ; averaging in over yields . Hence the net is Cauchy and we may define for every such that some , with for . The zero extension of to lies in by Holder [F2] on bounded balls, since ; its sufficiently small ball means at each interior point are those of . Thus [F3] and [F4] give for almost every , so almost everywhere: is a representative of the class. The Countable-Choice interface used here is supplied by [F5].
The Holder bound and continuity. Let and put ; the case is trivial. If , apply step 1.1 on the balls and and step 2.1 on their means: and similarly at ; both balls lie in when , so the two norms are at most . For the difference of the two means, both balls and lie in , and step 1.1 on bounds for almost every , ; averaging gives . Combining the three terms, . If , use the mean over the fixed ball : by step 1.1 on , for almost every one has , and since for , averaging over and letting gives , with the same bound at ; hence because when . This proves the displayed estimate with a constant depending only on and ; since the exponent is positive, is continuous on every ball with , hence on all of , and the equivalent Holder-norm statement follows from [F4].
Source notes
Kinnunen proves Morrey's inequality by combining the ball oscillation estimate (Lemma 5.22, reproduced in the preceding item) with Holder's inequality in the form , printed pp. 140 and 77-79; the present proof follows that route and records the two-regime comparison of means needed because the statement normalizes the right-hand norm on the fixed ball . The continuity of the representative and the identification almost everywhere are the standard Lebesgue-point argument.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- The average of a locally integrable function over a Euclidean ball
- Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls
- Ball-mean oscillation bound by the Riesz potential of the gradient
- Sphere and ball measures scale in Rn
- Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Lebesgue differentiation theorem on $\mathbb{R}^n$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces (Aalto University, 2026, complete graduate lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (UC Davis, revised 18 June 2014, complete 242-page two-quarter notes) (standard reference, not scraped)