Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Morrey--Rellich compactness for p>n

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let n≥2, let Ω⊆Rn be a bounded extension domain, let n<p<∞ and α=1−np. Replace every u∈W1,p(Ω) by its continuous Morrey representative u∗ (Morrey's inequality for p>n). Then every sequence bounded in W1,p(Ω) has a subsequence whose representatives converge in C0,β(Ω‾) for every 0≤β<α; in particular W1,p(Ω) is compactly embedded in every C0,β(Ω‾), 0≤β<α, and in Lq(Ω) for every 1≤q<∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice, a bounded extension domain Ω⊆Rn, n<p<∞, α=1−n/p, and a sequence (uj) with M:=sup⁡j∥uj∥W1,p(Ω)<∞.

[F1]

Extension and cutoff. There are a bounded extension operator E and a fixed η∈Cc∞(Rn) with η=1 on Ω; the products vj:=η Euj lie in W1,p(Rn), are supported in the fixed compact set supp⁡η, satisfy ∥vj∥W1,p(Rn)≤C1M, and equal uj almost everywhere on Ω. (Sobolev extension domains and extension operators, A Euclidean bump for a compact set inside an open set, Weak Leibniz rule with a smooth factor, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)

[F2]

Morrey's inequality on the compact set used here. Each vj in [F1] is supported in a fixed compact set K. Choose one ball B(x,R) containing K∪Ω‾. The supplier's local estimate on B(x,R), with B(x,2R)⊂Rn, gives [vj∗]C0,α(B(x,R))≤C2∥Dvj∥Lp(B(x,2R)) for the continuous representative. Its average on B(x,R) has modulus at most ∣B(x,R)∣−1/p∥vj∥Lp(B(x,R)), so the same oscillation estimate also bounds ∥vj∗∥L∞(B(x,R)) by C3∥vj∥W1,p(Rn). Continuous representatives are unique because continuous functions equal almost everywhere on an open ball are equal everywhere there. Thus both norms on Ω‾ are bounded by C4∥vj∥W1,p(Rn), with constants depending only on n,p,R. (Morrey's inequality for p>n, Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions)

[F3]

Arzel`a--Ascoli. A uniformly bounded, equicontinuous family of real functions on a compact metric space has a uniformly convergent subsequence; for complex-valued families apply this to real and imaginary parts. (Arzelà--Ascoli for real C(K) under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice: compact closure iff equicontinuous and pointwise bounded)

[F4]

H"older interpolation. For a bounded function g:K→K on any set K⊆Rn, write [g]C0,γ(K):=sup⁡x≠y∈K∣g(x)−g(y)∣/∣x−y∣γ and ∥g∥C0,γ(K):=∥g∥L∞(K)+[g]C0,γ(K). For 0<β<α and θ=β/α, the bound ∣g(x)−g(y)∣≤min⁡{2∥g∥L∞(K),[g]C0,α(K)∣x−y∣α} gives [g]C0,β(K)≤21−θ∥g∥L∞(K)1−θ[g]C0,α(K)θ, and hence ∥g∥C0,β(K)≤∥g∥L∞(K)+21−θ∥g∥L∞(K)1−θ[g]C0,α(K)θ. These follow from min⁡{A,B}≤A1−θBθ for A,B≥0; the seminorm and supremum conventions agree with Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls.

Proof

technique · extend, cut off, apply Morrey's inequality for uniform $C^{0,\alpha}$ bounds, extract uniformly convergent representatives by Arzel\`a--Ascoli, and interpolate down to $C^{0,\beta}$
1.1F1F2given

If Ω=∅ the claim is immediate. Otherwise, by [F1] and [F2] each vj∗ satisfies ∥vj∗∥L∞(Ω‾)≤C3C1M and [vj∗]C0,α(Ω‾)≤C2C1M; hence the family {vj∗∣Ω‾} is uniformly bounded and α-H"older, in particular equicontinuous, on the compact set Ω‾.

2.1F3step 1.1

By [F3] applied to the real and imaginary parts on the compact metric space Ω‾, a subsequence of (vj∗∣Ω‾) converges uniformly, that is, in C0,0(Ω‾); along it the C0,α seminorms stay bounded by step 1.1.

3.1F1F2F4step 1.1step 2.1∎

Fix 0<β<α and put θ=β/α. For the differences g=vk∗−vℓ∗ of the uniformly convergent subsequence, step 1.1 gives [g]C0,α(Ω‾)≤2C2C1M, while ∥g∥L∞(Ω‾)→0. By [F4], ∥g∥C0,β(Ω‾)≤∥g∥L∞(Ω‾)+21−θ∥g∥L∞(Ω‾)1−θ(2C2C1M)θ⟶0, If v is the uniform limit, passing to the limit in each difference quotient shows [v]C0,α≤C2C1M. Apply the same estimate to g=vk∗−v to obtain convergence in C0,β(Ω‾); the case β=0 is step 2.1. Since vj∗=uj almost everywhere on Ω by [F1] and [F2], this is the convergence of the Morrey representatives of the uj, and uniform convergence on the bounded Ω‾ implies convergence in Lq(Ω) for every 1≤q<∞, so W1,p(Ω) is compactly embedded in each C0,β(Ω‾), β<α, and in each Lq(Ω), 1≤q<∞. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the extension operator and Morrey's inequality.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources