How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Higher-order Rellich--Kondrachov compactness
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let , let be a bounded extension domain, let be integers and ; write when .
- (a) If , then is compactly embedded in for every .
- (b) If , then is compactly embedded in for every finite .
- (c) If and with , then every sequence bounded in has a subsequence whose representatives converge in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice, a bounded extension domain , integers , , and a sequence with .
Lower-order derivatives. For every , the sequence is bounded in , with norm at most , because . (Weak partial derivatives lower the Sobolev order, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, The notation and the reserved zero-boundary symbol)
First-order compactness. On a bounded extension domain, every sequence bounded in has a subsequence converging in . (Compactness of on bounded extension domains)
Higher-order continuous embeddings. Applying the higher-order Sobolev embedding on the support ball to each , where is the compactly supported extension in step 1.1, gives, uniformly in and , an bound when , a bound in every finite when , and a bound for by restriction when and . For derivatives with , the remaining Sobolev order is larger; finite-measure inclusion handles any stronger resulting integrability. (Weak partial derivatives lower the Sobolev order, Higher-order Sobolev embedding, Sobolev extension domains and extension operators, Compactly embedded normed spaces)
Finite-measure inclusion, interpolation, and completeness. If , then ; if and , then . Each is complete for . (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, Lyapunov interpolation inequality for norms, Riesz-Fischer completeness of for , The space as the quotient by null functions)
Weak derivatives pass to strong limits. If and in for , passing to the limit in the test identity shows weakly. Iterating gives the same conclusion for all derivatives of order at most . (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)
Arzel`a--Ascoli. A uniformly bounded equicontinuous family on a nonempty compact metric space has compact closure in the supremum norm; under Countable and Dependent Choice this gives a uniformly convergent subsequence. For complex functions apply the real result to real and imaginary parts. (Arzelà--Ascoli for real under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice: compact closure iff equicontinuous and pointwise bounded, For a metric space, compact, countably compact, limit point compact, sequentially compact, and complete together with totally bounded are all equivalent, given countable choice and dependent choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain)
Uniform limits preserve classical derivatives. If functions and their first derivatives converge uniformly on compact balls, the limit is there and its derivatives are the corresponding limits; apply the fundamental theorem of calculus on line segments, coordinate by coordinate. (Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions, maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space)
H"older interpolation. For , a uniformly convergent sequence with uniformly bounded seminorms converges in . Indeed, the difference quotient is bounded by the minimum of and , yielding the usual interpolation estimate with a constant depending on . (Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls)
Proof
If , all target spaces are trivial and the assertions hold. Otherwise choose the bounded extension at and a smooth cutoff equal to one near , with compact support in a ball . By the weak Leibniz rule, is bounded in and equals on (A Euclidean bump for a compact set inside an open set, Weak Leibniz rule with a smooth factor). For each , is bounded in by [F1]. The smooth ball is a -extension domain (Bounded C^k domains admit integer-order Sobolev extension), so [F2] applied on , followed by restriction to , gives a common subsequence on which all converge in . Only finitely many derivative sequences are extracted.
Consider cases (a) and (b). By [F3], for every the sequence is bounded in in case (a), and in every finite in case (b). If , finite- measure inclusion [F4] and step 1.1 make each derivative sequence Cauchy in . If in case (a), choose ; if in case (b), choose any finite . Lyapunov interpolation [F4] applied to differences, whose norms tend to zero by step 1.1 and whose norms are uniformly bounded by [F3], makes every derivative sequence Cauchy in . Completeness of gives limits . Passing to the limit in the weak derivative test identities by [F5] shows that for all , so in . The higher-order embedding [F3] also gives boundedness of the inclusion into each stated target, so this is compact embedding.
Consider case (c), and fix . Choose with . By [F3] the sequence is bounded in , so each of its finitely many derivative families of orders at most is uniformly bounded and equicontinuous on the compact set . By [F6], applying Arzel`a--Ascoli successively to these derivative families gives a common subsequence on which every converges uniformly to a continuous function on . On each ball compactly contained in , [F7] applied to line segments shows that is the classical -th derivative of whenever ; hence is a representative in whose derivatives through order extend continuously to . For the uniform convergence is the desired convergence. For , [F8] applied to each difference , using uniform convergence and the uniform bounds, gives convergence in to : each uniform limit retains the bounded seminorm by passage to the limit in the pointwise difference quotients, so [F8] applies directly to . Thus the asserted compact embedding holds, and the Axiom of Choice supplies the subsequence and the choice interfaces of [F2] and [F6].
Depends on
- Weak partial derivatives lower the Sobolev order
- Compactness of $W^{1,p}(\Omega)\hookrightarrow L^p(\Omega)$ on bounded extension domains
- Higher-order Sobolev embedding
- Arzelà--Ascoli for real $C(K)$ under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice: compact closure iff equicontinuous and pointwise bounded
- For a metric space, compact, countably compact, limit point compact, sequentially compact, and complete together with totally bounded are all equivalent, given countable choice and dependent choice
- Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions
- Riesz-Fischer completeness of $L^p$ for $1 \le p \le \infty$
- Weak derivative of a locally integrable function
- $C^k$ maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space
- The notation $H^k$ and the reserved zero-boundary symbol
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- Sobolev extension domains and extension operators
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Lyapunov interpolation inequality for $L^p$ norms
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls
- Compactly embedded normed spaces
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- The Axiom of Choice
- Bounded C^k domains admit integer-order Sobolev extension
- A Euclidean bump for a compact set inside an open set
- Weak Leibniz rule with a smooth factor
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
110 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (UC Davis, revised 18 June 2014, complete 242-page two-quarter notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (archived 2025 author manuscript) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces (Aalto University, 2026, complete graduate lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)