Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Higher-order Rellich--Kondrachov compactness

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let n≥2, let Ω⊆Rn be a bounded extension domain, let k>m≥0 be integers and 1≤p<∞; write pk−m∗=npn−(k−m)p when (k−m)p<n.

  • (a) If (k−m)p<n, then Wk,p(Ω) is compactly embedded in Wm,q(Ω) for every 1≤q<pk−m∗.
  • (b) If (k−m)p≥n, then Wk,p(Ω) is compactly embedded in Wm,q(Ω) for every finite q.
  • (c) If (k−m)p>n and 0≤β<1 with β<k−m−np, then every sequence bounded in Wk,p(Ω) has a subsequence whose representatives converge in Cm,β(Ω‾).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice, a bounded extension domain Ω⊆Rn, integers k>m≥0, 1≤p<∞, and a sequence (uj) with M:=sup⁡j∥uj∥Wk,p(Ω)<∞.

[F1]

Lower-order derivatives. For every ∣α∣≤m, the sequence (Dαuj) is bounded in W1,p(Ω), with norm at most CM, because k−∣α∣≥1. (Weak partial derivatives lower the Sobolev order, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, The notation Hk and the reserved zero-boundary symbol)

[F2]

First-order Lp compactness. On a bounded extension domain, every sequence bounded in W1,p(Ω) has a subsequence converging in Lp(Ω). (Compactness of W1,p(Ω)↪Lp(Ω) on bounded extension domains)

[F3]

Higher-order continuous embeddings. Applying the higher-order Sobolev embedding on the support ball B to each Dαvj, where vj=ηEuj is the compactly supported extension in step 1.1, gives, uniformly in j and ∣α∣≤m, an Lpk−m∗ bound when (k−m)p<n, a bound in every finite Lr when (k−m)p≥n, and a Cm,β′(Ω‾) bound for (uj) by restriction when (k−m)p>n and 0<β′<min⁡{1,k−m−np}. For derivatives with ∣α∣<m, the remaining Sobolev order is larger; finite-measure inclusion handles any stronger resulting integrability. (Weak partial derivatives lower the Sobolev order, Higher-order Sobolev embedding, Sobolev extension domains and extension operators, Compactly embedded normed spaces)

[F4]

Finite-measure inclusion, interpolation, and completeness. If 1≤q≤p, then ∥g∥Lq(Ω)≤∣Ω∣1/q−1/p∥g∥Lp(Ω); if p<q<r<∞ and 1/q=λ/p+(1−λ)/r, then ∥g∥Lq≤∥g∥Lpλ∥g∥Lr1−λ. Each Lq(Ω) is complete for 1≤q<∞. (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, Lyapunov interpolation inequality for Lp norms, Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1≤p≤∞, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions)

[F5]

Weak derivatives pass to strong limits. If fj→f and Difj→gi in Lq(Ω) for 1≤q<∞, passing to the limit in the test identity shows Dif=gi weakly. Iterating gives the same conclusion for all derivatives of order at most m. (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)

[F7]

Uniform limits preserve classical derivatives. If C1 functions and their first derivatives converge uniformly on compact balls, the limit is C1 there and its derivatives are the corresponding limits; apply the fundamental theorem of calculus on line segments, coordinate by coordinate. (Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions, Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space)

[F8]

H"older interpolation. For 0<β<β′<1, a uniformly convergent sequence with uniformly bounded C0,β′ seminorms converges in C0,β. Indeed, the difference quotient is bounded by the minimum of 2∥g∥∞∣x−y∣−β and [g]C0,β′∣x−y∣β′−β, yielding the usual interpolation estimate with a constant depending on β,β′. (Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls)

Proof

technique · extract strong $L^p$ convergence for the finite derivative family, interpolate against higher-order Sobolev bounds, and use Arzel\`a--Ascoli for the supercritical Hölder conclusion
1.1F1F2F3given

If Ω=∅, all target spaces are trivial and the assertions hold. Otherwise choose the bounded extension E at (k,p) and a smooth cutoff η equal to one near Ω‾, with compact support in a ball B. By the weak Leibniz rule, vj=ηEuj is bounded in Wk,p(Rn) and equals uj on Ω (A Euclidean bump for a compact set inside an open set, Weak Leibniz rule with a smooth factor). For each ∣α∣≤m, Dαvj is bounded in W1,p(B) by [F1]. The smooth ball is a W1,p-extension domain (Bounded C^k domains admit integer-order Sobolev extension), so [F2] applied on B, followed by restriction to Ω, gives a common subsequence on which all Dαuj converge in Lp(Ω). Only finitely many derivative sequences are extracted.

2.1F3F4F5step 1.1

Consider cases (a) and (b). By [F3], for every ∣α∣≤m the sequence (Dαujk) is bounded in Lpk−m∗(Ω) in case (a), and in every finite Lr(Ω) in case (b). If q≤p, finite- measure inclusion [F4] and step 1.1 make each derivative sequence Cauchy in Lq. If p<q<pk−m∗ in case (a), choose r=pk−m∗; if p<q<∞ in case (b), choose any finite r>q. Lyapunov interpolation [F4] applied to differences, whose Lp norms tend to zero by step 1.1 and whose Lr norms are uniformly bounded by [F3], makes every derivative sequence Cauchy in Lq. Completeness of Lq gives limits vα. Passing to the limit in the weak derivative test identities by [F5] shows that vα=Dαv0 for all ∣α∣≤m, so ujk→v0 in Wm,q(Ω). The higher-order embedding [F3] also gives boundedness of the inclusion into each stated target, so this is compact embedding.

3.1F3F6F7F8step 1.1∎

Consider case (c), and fix 0≤β<min⁡{1,k−m−np}. Choose β′ with β<β′<min⁡{1,k−m−np}. By [F3] the sequence is bounded in Cm,β′(Ω‾), so each of its finitely many derivative families of orders at most m is uniformly bounded and equicontinuous on the compact set Ω‾. By [F6], applying Arzel`a--Ascoli successively to these derivative families gives a common subsequence on which every Dαujk converges uniformly to a continuous function vα on Ω‾. On each ball compactly contained in Ω, [F7] applied to line segments shows that vα+ei is the classical i-th derivative of vα whenever ∣α∣<m; hence v0 is a representative in Cm(Ω) whose derivatives through order m extend continuously to Ω‾. For β=0 the uniform convergence is the desired Cm,0 convergence. For β>0, [F8] applied to each difference Dα(ujk−ujℓ), using uniform convergence and the uniform C0,β′ bounds, gives convergence in Cm,β(Ω‾) to v0: each uniform limit vα retains the bounded β′ seminorm by passage to the limit in the pointwise difference quotients, so [F8] applies directly to Dαujk−vα. Thus the asserted compact embedding holds, and the Axiom of Choice supplies the subsequence and the choice interfaces of [F2] and [F6].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

110 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources