How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Arzelà--Ascoli for real under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice: compact closure iff equicontinuous and pointwise bounded
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) and the Axiom of Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain). Let be a nonempty compact metric space and . Its closure in the supremum metric is compact if and only if is equicontinuous and pointwise bounded.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, the Axiom of Dependent Choice, and a family .
An equicontinuous pointwise-bounded family is totally bounded in the supremum metric (An equicontinuous pointwise-bounded family in has a finite net in the supremum metric).
is complete in the supremum metric ( is complete in the supremum metric for every nonempty compact metric space ).
A subspace of a complete metric space is complete exactly when it is closed; assuming Countable Choice and Dependent Choice, in a metric space compactness is equivalent to completeness together with total boundedness (A subspace of a complete metric space is complete iff it is closed, and a complete subspace of any metric space is closed, For a metric space, compact, countably compact, limit point compact, sequentially compact, and complete together with totally bounded are all equivalent, given countable choice and dependent choice).
Equicontinuity and pointwise boundedness are as defined in Equicontinuity, pointwise boundedness, and uniform boundedness for families in .
A continuous function on a compact metric space is uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous).
Proof
Suppose is equicontinuous and pointwise bounded. By [L1] it is totally bounded, and its closure is totally bounded as well.
Conversely suppose the closure is compact. For a positive , choose a finite -net in the closure; by [L5], a common positive radius makes every vary by less than .
The closure is closed in the complete space of [L2], hence complete by [L3]. Therefore its closure is compact by [L3].
For , choose within in supremum distance. The two uniform-distance bounds and step 1.2 give whenever is below the common radius.
The same finite net bounds at each fixed , so is pointwise bounded.
Steps 2.2 and 2.3 give equicontinuity and pointwise boundedness, completing the converse.
Depends on
- An equicontinuous pointwise-bounded family in $C(K,\mathbb R)$ has a finite net in the supremum metric
- $C(K,\mathbb{R})$ is complete in the supremum metric for every nonempty compact metric space $K$
- A subspace of a complete metric space is complete iff it is closed, and a complete subspace of any metric space is closed
- For a metric space, compact, countably compact, limit point compact, sequentially compact, and complete together with totally bounded are all equivalent, given countable choice and dependent choice
- Equicontinuity, pointwise boundedness, and uniform boundedness for families in $C(K,\mathbb R)$
- Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous
Used by
- Every pointwise-bounded equicontinuous sequence in C(K,ℝ) has a uniformly convergent subsequence Corollary
- Rudin's bounded rational spikes are not equicontinuous and have no uniformly convergent subsequence Counterexample
- Under the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice, the family x↦|x-a|, a∈[0,1], is compact in C([0,1]) Example
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 100 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Ascoli--Arzelà Theorem (MIT) (standard reference, not scraped)