How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Under the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice, the family , , is compact in
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) and the Axiom of Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain). The family , where , is compact in the supremum metric.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, the Axiom of Dependent Choice, and for .
Every sequence in has a convergent subsequence (Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence).
Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice, sequential compactness and compactness are equivalent for a metric space (For a metric space, compact, countably compact, limit point compact, sequentially compact, and complete together with totally bounded are all equivalent, given countable choice and dependent choice).
Proof
The reverse triangle inequality gives for every ; evaluating at gives .
Given a sequence in , use [L1] to choose . Step 1.1 then gives uniformly.
Thus is sequentially compact, and it is compact by [L2].
Depends on
- Arzelà--Ascoli for real $C(K)$ under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice: compact closure iff equicontinuous and pointwise bounded
- For a metric space, compact, countably compact, limit point compact, sequentially compact, and complete together with totally bounded are all equivalent, given countable choice and dependent choice
- Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 101 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Ascoli--Arzelà Theorem (MIT) (standard reference, not scraped)