Approximation and Compactness in : Examples and Counterexamples
About this page
How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
✓ 7 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 7 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.
1 · Prerequisites
Abstract Algebra
Linear Algebra
Real Analysis
- Approximation and Compactness in C(K)
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Countability and Uncountability
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Suprema and Infima
Set Theory
2 · Logical flowchart
3 · Items
Counterexample
Rudin's bounded rational spikes are not equicontinuous and have no uniformly convergent subsequence
Counterexample
All constant functions form an equicontinuous family that is not pointwise bounded
Counterexample
Translations of a fixed bump on ℝ are uniformly bounded and equicontinuous but have no uniformly convergent subsequence
Example
The Bernstein polynomials of f(x)=x² equal x²+x(1-x)/n
Example
Under the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice, the family x↦|x-a|, a∈[0,1], is compact in C([0,1])
Counterexample
Even polynomials on [-1,1] form a unital algebra but are not dense because they do not separate -1 and 1
Counterexample