How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weak partial derivatives lower the Sobolev order
Statement
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be open, , and . For every multi-index with the weak derivative , viewed as an class, belongs to , and a.e. whenever .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; an open with ; integers ; an exponent ; a class ; and multi-indices with and .
means that and all weak derivatives with have representatives in (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).
A weak derivative is defined by the test-function integration-by-parts identity against test functions (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function).
If and exist in and also exists in , then exists and equals almost everywhere (Linearity, locality, and commutation of weak derivatives).
Weak derivatives in are unique as almost-everywhere classes (Uniqueness of a weak derivative as an almost-everywhere class).
Countable Choice, assumed throughout (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Regularity bookkeeping. Since and , the classes , and are defined and lie in by [F1]; representatives of classes are locally integrable on the open set , so both are classes in to which the weak-differentiation calculus of [F2] applies.
Commutation. With as in the Given, the hypotheses of [F3] are met by step 1.1: , and exist in , hence exists and satisfies almost everywhere on .
Descent of the order. By step 2.1, for every multi-index with the weak derivative exists and equals , which lies in by step 1.1; also . By [F1] this says exactly that the class belongs to . The identity is an almost-everywhere identity of classes, and by uniqueness [F4] it is independent of the representatives chosen for and .
Source notes
The source records the commutation of weak partial derivatives as part of the elementary calculus of weak derivatives; the proof above isolates the two uses: existence of the higher derivative and uniqueness of the classes. No regularity of and no boundedness of is needed.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces (Aalto University, 2026, complete graduate lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)