How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Sobolev space is an algebra above the critical index
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let , let be a bounded -extension domain, and with . Then there is with so is a Banach algebra; the constants and the conclusion may depend on the choice of equivalent Sobolev norm only through .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice; ; a bounded extension domain ; ; with ; and classes .
For fix its bounded whole-space extension and a ball . By Weak partial derivatives lower the Sobolev order, with and norm at most . A ball is a -extension domain for every integer by Bounded C^k domains admit integer-order Sobolev extension. Apply Higher-order Sobolev embedding on and restrict to : is bounded if , lies in every finite if , and lies in for if . If , use its original bound. All norms are controlled by ; this needs only the fixed extension of , not extension operators for lower-order classes on (Sobolev extension domains and extension operators, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).
Meyers-Serrin density: for the smooth functions in are dense in (Meyers–Serrin density on an arbitrary open set, whose Countable-Choice hypothesis is supplied by the Axiom of Choice assumed here; The space as the quotient by null functions).
Holder's inequality in its multi-factor form: for nonnegative measurable with one has on the finite measure domain: apply Holder to , and with reciprocal exponents , and (iterate the two-factor inequality; an exponent means an factor). Taking -th roots gives the displayed bound (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
The weak derivative is characterized by the test-function identity: an class is the weak -derivative of exactly when for every (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms). For smooth functions the classical derivatives are the weak derivatives (Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives).
is complete (Integer-order Sobolev spaces are Banach).
Proof
The product estimate for derivatives. Let and let be multi-indices with ; put , so that . By [F1] choose exponents with and as follows: when ; when ; and when , which is available because the critical embedding supplies every finite exponent. In every case : for two subcritical exponents this is because ; for one critical and one subcritical exponent it is because ; for two critical exponents it is because (recall with forces ); and a supercritical exponent contributes . Hence by generalized Holder [F3], with .
The Leibniz identity and the algebra bound. By [F2] choose with and in . Fix ; for the smooth factors, repeated classical differentiation gives the finite Leibniz formula, and [F4] identifies its classical derivatives with weak derivatives: . Applying step 1.1 to the pairs and with shows that each summand converges in to , and the case gives in ; therefore, for every test function , with . By the characterization [F4], is the weak -derivative of for every , so , and by step 1.1, which is the asserted algebra inequality. Completeness [F5] makes it a Banach algebra with continuous multiplication (after an equivalent norm rescaling if a submultiplicative norm is required).
Source notes
The algebra property of above the critical index is the standard consequence of the higher-order embedding and the Leibniz rule; Kinnunen's Morrey theorem and higher-order iteration, together with Hunter's first-order embedding, supply the context; the product estimate and weak Leibniz passage are reconstructed here. The proof above isolates the two ingredients: the product estimate 1.1, where the embedding either makes a factor bounded (when its remaining order exceeds ), supplies every finite exponent (at the critical order) or supplies the Sobolev exponent (below it), and Holder combines the two; and the Leibniz identity 2.1, which passes the classical formula for smooth approximations to the limit in and identifies the limit through the test-function definition of the weak derivative.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Sobolev extension domains and extension operators
- Weak derivative of a locally integrable function
- Higher-order Sobolev embedding
- Meyers–Serrin density on an arbitrary open set
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces are Banach
- Weak partial derivatives lower the Sobolev order
- Bounded C^k domains admit integer-order Sobolev extension
- Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces (Aalto University, 2026, complete graduate lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (UC Davis, revised 18 June 2014, complete 242-page two-quarter notes) (standard reference, not scraped)