How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Local smooth approximation in integer-order Sobolev spaces
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be open with , let , and , and let . Fix a nonnegative of unit mass with , put , and define the interior mollification where is a representative of extended by zero to . Then in for every open ; equivalently in . The exponent is included, and no assertion about density or convergence in the norm is made.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; an open set with ; ; ; ; a class ; a nonnegative unit-mass with support in ; and an open set , so that is a compact subset of .
Interior mollification commutes with weak derivatives: with and extended by zero, one has on for every , and is smooth there (Interior mollification commutes with weak derivatives).
The family is the mollifier family generated by the unit-mass bump (The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump).
Approximate identity convergence: the family is an approximate identity (A unit-mass smooth bump generates an approximate identity); if and , then as (Every approximate identity converges to the identity in for ), and the same holds for complex-valued with the complex convolution conventions, including the case of a complex scalar field (Complex translation, convolution, approximate identities, and mollification).
For the extension by zero lies in with , because the integral over a measurable set is the integral of the indicator product (Integral over a measurable subset, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions).
The norm is the sum of the norms of all derivative classes with ; for it is the maximum of the essential bounds (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).
Compact containment: compact with open implies , and for every satisfies , i.e. ; Here distance to the empty set is , including when or ; the containment still holds. This is elementary metric topology and uses no choice.
Choice use. Countable Choice is used through the approximate-identity and mollification interfaces of [F1] and [F3]; the compact-containment constant of [F6] is explicit and choice-free.
Proof
Fix and put as in [F6]; then for every . Also, for each the zero extension belongs to with by [F4], since .
By [F1], for every and every the identity holds as an identity of smooth functions, since .
For each the right-hand side of step 2.1 converges to in : by [F2] and [F3] applied to the class , as . Hence
Summing the finitely many convergences of step 3.1 over , the norm formula of [F5] gives ; since was arbitrary, this is convergence in . The proof uses exactly through the approximate-identity convergence in step 3.1, makes no claim for , and the case is the single multi-index , namely convergence in .
Depends on
- Interior mollification commutes with weak derivatives
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump
- A unit-mass smooth bump generates an $L^1$ approximate identity
- Every $L^1$ approximate identity converges to the identity in $L^p$ for $1 \le p < \infty$
- Complex translation, convolution, approximate identities, and mollification
- Integral over a measurable subset
- Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces (2026), Lemma 1.18 and Theorem 1.19(2) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard S. Laugesen, Linear Analysis and Partial Differential Equations (2020), Proposition 3.7 (standard reference, not scraped)