Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The critical Riesz potential can diverge and be essentially unbounded

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let n≥1, 0<α<n and p0:=n/α>1. Define f(0):=0 and f(y):=∣y∣−α(log⁡e∣y∣)−1(0<∣y∣<e−1),f(y):=0(∣y∣≥e−1). Then f belongs to Lp0(Rn;C), while the defining absolute integral of the Riesz potential of Riesz potential of order alpha diverges at the origin, Iαf(0)=+∞ in the sense that the defining absolute integral is infinite there, and Iαf is not essentially bounded: for every threshold T>0 and some δ=δ(T)>0 the superlevel set {∣Iαf∣>T} contains the punctured ball B(0,δ)∖{0}, which has positive Lebesgue measure. Hence the raw Riesz integral is not a bounded map from Lp0(Rn;C) to L∞(Rn;C), and the critical exponent cannot be added to the strict-range strong theorem.

The function is nonnegative and finite-valued: it vanishes at the origin and off the punctured ball of radius e−1, and on {0<∣y∣<e−1} it is the continuous radial expression ∣y∣−α(log⁡(e/∣y∣))−1, which is positive there. Polar integration converts its Lp0 integral into the half-line integral σ(Sn−1)∫2∞u−p0du, finite exactly because p0>1; for the origin integral, polar coordinates and the Lebesgue change of variables give the integral of u^-1 over [2,infinity), which diverges because each half-open dyadic interval [2^j,2^(j+1)), j>=1, contributes at least 1/2. Finally, on the annulus 2∣x∣<∣y∣<e−1 the kernel obeys ∣x−y∣α−n≥(3∣y∣/2)α−n, so the potential at x≠0 is bounded below by a positive constant times log⁡log⁡(e/(2∣x∣))−log⁡2, which tends to infinity as x→0; every sufficiently small punctured ball is therefore a superlevel set, and punctured balls have positive measure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, 0<α<n, p0=n/α>1, and the function f displayed in the statement.

[F1]

The unit Riesz potential is Iαf(x)=∫Kα(x−y)f(y) dy, with Kα(z)=∣z∣α−n for z≠0, at every point where the absolute integral is finite; where the defining absolute integral is infinite no finite value is assigned. (Riesz potential of order alpha)

[F2]

Complex Lp classes for finite p, their norms, the modulus of a complex measurable function, and the convention that finite-valued complex functions are integrated componentwise. (Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions)

[F3]

Under Countable Choice, for every nonnegative Borel h, ∫Rnh dλn=∫0∞∫Sn−1h(rω)rn−1 dσ(ω) dr with σ a finite Borel measure, and σ(Sn−1)=nλ(B(0,1))>0. (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, Euclidean balls have positive finite Lebesgue measure)

[F4]

The improper p-test for rational exponents: ∫1∞u−pdu converges exactly when p>1; in particular ∫2∞u−1du diverges. Comparison: if 0≤f≤g eventually at a singular end and ∫g converges, then ∫f converges. Substitution: a monotone differentiable surjection between intervals, with locally integrable derivative and proper change-of-variable hypotheses on compact truncations, transports convergence and the value of an improper integral, with orientation retained for decreasing parametrizations. A nonnegative improper Riemann integral on a half-line that converges agrees with the Lebesgue integral. (The improper p-test for rational exponents, Comparison tests for improper integrals, Change of variable in an improper integral, A nonnegative improper Riemann integral on a half-line agrees with the Lebesgue integral)

[F5]

For x>0, log⁡x=∫1xdt/t, so ∫1Lu−1du=log⁡L for every L>1. (The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t)

[F6]

The integral over a measurable set is the integral of the product with its indicator; the nonnegative Lebesgue integral is monotone and homogeneous for nonnegative scalars. (Integral over a measurable subset, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral)

[F7]

Continuous real functions on Euclidean space are Borel measurable; sums, products, scalar multiples and absolute values of Borel measurable real functions are Borel measurable; a function that agrees on an open set with a continuous function and is constant on the complementary closed set is Borel measurable; every Borel subset of Euclidean space is Lebesgue measurable. (Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable, Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined, Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of Rn is Lebesgue measurable, Borel measurable and Lebesgue measurable functions on Rn)

[F8]

Countable Choice is the choice principle assumed by the polar and measure interfaces used here. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F9]

For a C1 diffeomorphism T:U→V between open Euclidean sets and nonnegative Lebesgue-measurable h, ∫Vh=∫U(h∘T)∣det⁡DT∣. In particular y↦x−y is a diffeomorphism with absolute Jacobian 1, and T(r)=log⁡(e/r) maps (0,e−1) diffeomorphically onto (2,∞) with ∣T′(r)∣=1/r: its inverse is u↦e1−u by the definition of log⁡, while the logarithm and exponential are C1. (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t, The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡) (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries)

Counterexample

technique · direct; establish $L^{p_0}$ membership by substitution and prove origin divergence by Lebesgue change of variables and dyadic shells, then lower-bound the potential on a punctured annulus and read off essential unboundedness
1.1F7

Measurability and nonnegativity. On the open set U={0<∣y∣<e−1} the function y↦∣y∣−α(log⁡(e/∣y∣))−1 is continuous and positive, since ∣y∣↦∣y∣ and the logarithm are continuous and log⁡(e/∣y∣)>0 for ∣y∣<e−1; on the closed complement Rn∖U={0}∪{∣y∣≥e−1} the function f is the constant 0. By [F7] the function f is Borel and Lebesgue measurable, nonnegative, and finite-valued, with f(0)=0.

1.2F9algebra

Substitution for the radial profiles. The map T(r)=log⁡(e/r) is a decreasing C1 diffeomorphism from (0,e−1) onto (2,∞), with ∣T′(r)∣=1/r. Applying [F9] to the nonnegative function u↦u−s gives, for every real s, the equality of extended nonnegative Lebesgue integrals ∫0e−1r−1(log⁡(e/r))−sdr=∫2∞u−sdu. Here T(e−1)=2 at the limiting endpoint.

1.3F1F2F3F6F9givenalgebra

Absolute convergence at every nonzero point. Fix x≠0. Since (log⁡(e/∣y∣))−1<1 for 0<∣y∣<e−1, the function satisfies ∣f(y)∣≤∣y∣−α on its support, so Kα(x−y)∣f(y)∣≤∣x−y∣α−n∣y∣−α there. On the measurable set {∣x−y∣<∣x∣/2} one has ∣y∣>∣x∣/2, so ∣y∣−α<(∣x∣/2)−α, and [F9] applied to the change of variables z=x−y together with the polar formula [F3] gives ∫∣x−y∣<∣x∣/2∣x−y∣α−n∣y∣−αdy≤(∣x∣2)−α∫∣z∣<∣x∣/2∣z∣α−ndz=(∣x∣2)−ασ(Sn−1)∫0∣x∣/2sα−1ds<∞, because α>0. On the complementary set, ∣x−y∣≥∣x∣/2>0 gives ∣x−y∣α−n≤(∣x∣/2)α−n, and [F3] gives ∫{∣y∣<e−1}∣y∣−αdy=σ(Sn−1)∫0e−1sn−1−αds<∞, because n−α>0. The two regions together cover the support of f, so the defining absolute integral of Iαf at x is finite: Iαf(x) is defined by [F1] at every x≠0.

1.4F1F3F9F10

Divergence at the origin. At x=0 the absolute integrand is ∣y∣−n(log⁡(e/∣y∣))−1 on 0<∣y∣<e−1, a nonnegative Borel radial function. Polar coordinates [F3] and Lebesgue change of variables [F9] with u=log⁡(e/r) give ∫RnKα(−y)∣f(y)∣ dλn(y)=σ(Sn−1)∫2∞u−1 dλ1(u). For j≥1 and Jj=[2j,2j+1), one has u−1≥2−j−1 on Jj and λ1(Jj)=2j by [F10], so ∫Jju−1 dλ1≥1/2. Additivity and monotonicity in [F10] show the integral over [2,∞) is at least N/2 for every positive integer N, hence it is infinite. Since σ(Sn−1)>0 by [F3], the defining absolute integral diverges and no finite value of Iαf(0) is assigned by [F1].

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1step 1.2algebra

The function lies in Lp0. Since αp0=n, the nonnegative Borel function ∣f∣p0 is radial with profile rn−1r−αp0(log⁡(e/r))−p0=r−1(log⁡(e/r))−p0 on (0,e−1) and 0 elsewhere, so [F3] and step 1.2 give ∫Rn∣f∣p0dλ=σ(Sn−1)∫0e−1r−1(log⁡(e/r))−p0dr=σ(Sn−1)∫2∞u−p0du. Choose a rational q with 1<q<p0, possible because p0>1; then 0≤u−p0≤u−q for u≥1, and ∫1∞u−qdu converges by [F4], so the comparison principle of [F4] makes ∫2∞u−p0du converge. Its value is finite and σ(Sn−1) is finite by [F3], so f∈Lp0(Rn;C).

2.2F1F6step 1.1step 1.3algebra

Lower bound on a punctured annulus. Let 0<∣x∣<e−1/2 and suppose y satisfies 2∣x∣<∣y∣<e−1. Then ∣x∣<∣y∣/2, so the triangle inequality gives ∣x−y∣≤∣x∣+∣y∣<3∣y∣/2; because α−n<0, raising the positive quantities to the power α−n reverses the inequality and Kα(x−y)≥(3∣y∣/2)α−n=(32)α−n∣y∣α−n. Step 1.3 makes the defining integral at x absolutely convergent, so integrating this lower bound against the nonnegative function f on the measurable annulus Ax:={2∣x∣<∣y∣<e−1} and using monotonicity and the scalar rule of [F6] is legitimate and gives Iαf(x)≥(32)α−n∫Ax∣y∣α−n∣f(y)∣ dy=(32)α−n∫Ax∣y∣−n(log⁡(e/∣y∣))−1dy.

3.1F3F5step 1.2step 2.2

Evaluation of the annular integral. The integrand in step 2.2 is a nonnegative Borel radial function equal to r−1(log⁡(e/r))−1 in the radial variable, so [F3] and step 1.2 give ∫Ax∣y∣−n(log⁡(e/∣y∣))−1dy=σ(Sn−1)∫2∣x∣e−1r−1(log⁡(e/r))−1dr=σ(Sn−1)∫2log⁡(e/(2∣x∣))u−1du. The upper limit exceeds 2 because ∣x∣<e−1/2, so [F5] evaluates the last integral as log⁡(log⁡(e/(2∣x∣)))−log⁡2, and the lower bound of step 2.2 reads Iαf(x)≥(32)α−nσ(Sn−1)[log⁡(log⁡e2∣x∣)−log⁡2].

4.1F3step 1.4step 3.1

Essential unboundedness. Fix T>0. Since log⁡log⁡(e/(2r))→+∞ as r→0+ and (32)α−nσ(Sn−1)>0 by [F3], there is δ∈(0,e−1/2) with (32)α−nσ(Sn−1)[log⁡log⁡(e/(2δ))−log⁡2]>T. Step 3.1 then gives Iαf(x)>T for every x with 0<∣x∣<δ, so the superlevel set {∣Iαf∣>T} contains the punctured ball B(0,δ)∖{0}. That punctured ball contains the annulus {δ/2<∣x∣<δ}, a Borel set whose measure σ(Sn−1)∫δ/2δsn−1ds>0 is positive by [F3]; at x=0 the defining absolute integral is +∞ by step 1.4, so Iαf(0) is not assigned a finite value. Hence {∣Iαf∣>T} is not a null set for any T, and no constant T can bound ∣Iαf∣ almost everywhere.

5.1F8step 2.1step 1.4step 4.1∎

Conclusion. Steps 2.1, 1.4 and 4.1 exhibit a function f∈Lp0(Rn;C) whose Riesz integral diverges at the origin and whose finite values are essentially unbounded on every neighbourhood of the origin, so the critical case p0=n/α admits neither a finite raw potential at every point nor a bounded Lp0→L∞ estimate. This shows the necessity of the strict range 1<p<n/α in the strong theorem of this pair. Countable Choice is used only through the polar, measure, and Lebesgue change-of-variables interfaces [F3]-[F4] and [F8]-[F10]; no other choice principle is invoked.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

126 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources