Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let U,V⊆Rn be open and let T:U→V be a C1 diffeomorphism. For every nonnegative Lebesgue measurable f:V→[0,∞], ∫Vf(y) dλn(y)=∫Uf(T(x)) ∣det⁡DT(x)∣ dλn(x).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, open sets U,V⊆Rn, a C1 diffeomorphism T:U→V, and a nonnegative Lebesgue measurable function f:V→[0,∞].

[L2]

Monotone convergence passes increasing limits through the integral. (Monotone convergence for the integral)

[L3]

Every nonnegative measurable function admits increasing simple approximations. (Every nonnegative measurable function admits an explicit increasing sequence of simple approximations)

[L5]

Two measures on V agreeing on a generating pi-system with a common increasing finite-mass exhaustion from that system agree on all Borel sets (Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system).

[L6]

The nonnegative integral is additive (Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L2L6given

On Borel subsets E of V define ν(E):=∫U1E(T(x))∣det⁡DT(x)∣ dλn(x). This is a measure: the nonnegative Jacobian weight is measurable, inverse images under T take disjoint countable unions to disjoint countable unions, [L6] gives finite additivity, and [L2] passes the increasing finite sums through the integral.

2.1L1L2step 1.1

Let W=V∩R for a bounded open rectangle R with rational endpoints. Write d(y,Wc) for Euclidean distance to the complement and ∥y∥∞ for the maximum coordinate modulus. The functions φj(y)=min⁡{1,max⁡(0,jd(y,Wc)−1)}min⁡{1,max⁡(0,j+1−∥y∥∞)} are continuous, nonnegative and increase pointwise to 1W. Each support is contained in the compact set {d(y,Wc)≥1/j, ∥y∥∞≤j+1}⊂W, so φj∣V has compact support in V. Applying [L1] to each φj and [L2] to the two monotone limits gives ν(W)=λn(W). The empty W is immediate.

3.1L5step 1.1step 2.1

The sets V∩R above form a pi-system generating the Borel sigma-algebra of V. The increasing members Pj=V∩(−j,j)n cover V and satisfy λn(Pj)<∞; step 2.1 gives ν(Pj)=λn(Pj). Hence [L5] makes ν(E)=λn(E) for every Borel E⊆V. This proves the set formula without assuming that an infinite-measure equality class is closed under decreasing intersections.

4.1L2L4step 3.1

Let s=∑j=1mcj1Ej be a nonnegative simple Lebesgue measurable function. By [L4], replace each Ej by a Borel set differing from it only by a null set. The set formula from step 3.1 and null-set invariance in [L4] then give the change-of-variables formula for s.

5.1L2L3step 4.1∎

Choose simple functions sk↑f by [L3]. Step 4.1 applies to each sk, and [L2] lets k→∞ on both sides. This yields the formula for f.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources