Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The inverse of a quasiconformal map is quasiconformal with the same dilatation

Sources

  • Mikhail Lyubich, Conformal Geometry and Dynamics of Quadratic Polynomials, vol. I, Ch. 2 §12.5, printed p. 188, Proposition 12.15, for inverse and composition quasiconformality; These earlier source sections are contextual; the present proof obtains inverse regularity from the independent quadrilateral equivalence, then proves its area and chain-rule interfaces locally.
  • Christopher J. Bishop, Quasiconformal Mappings, Ch. 2 §1, printed pp. 49–51, for the real-linear inverse dilatation and the Beltrami chain identity.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let f:Ω→Ω′ be an analytically K-quasiconformal homeomorphism (The ACL and Sobolev analytic definition of quasiconformality) with Beltrami coefficient μf (The Beltrami coefficient and the maximal dilatation). Then g=f−1:Ω′→Ω is analytically K-quasiconformal, Kg=Kf, and μg(f(z))=−μf(z) fz(z)fz(z)‾for almost every z∈Ω. Consequently ∣μg∣∘f=∣μf∣ almost everywhere, and f is analytically quasiconformal exactly when f−1 is, with the same maximal dilatation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, complex domains Ω,Ω′, and an analytic K-quasiconformal homeomorphism f:Ω→Ω′.

[F1]

Analytic and geometric quasiconformality agree with the same constant. The inverse geometric bounds follow by rearrangement and its orientation sign is the inverse positive local-homology map; hence the inverse is independently analytically K-quasiconformal (The geometric and analytic definitions of quasiconformality agree, Orientation-preserving homeomorphisms and the geometric definition of quasiconformality).

[F2]

The earlier core gives total differentiability a.e. and the lower area inequality, without assuming inverse regularity (Analytic quasiconformality gives both quadrilateral modulus bounds, Remark). The mollifications are smooth (Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign). Smooth Sard and ordinary nonnegative change of variables apply to its smooth approximants (Morse-Sard for smooth manifolds, A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions). The complete reverse area argument is supplied below, separately for each already-regular inverse. Interior mollification and Lp approximate identities give derivative convergence; for continuous functions they converge uniformly on compacta (Interior mollification commutes with weak derivatives, Every L1 approximate identity converges to the identity in Lp for 1≤p<∞, L1 approximate identities converge uniformly on compacta for bounded continuous functions). The AC fundamental theorem is Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions.

[F3]

For a real-differentiable homeomorphism f at z with invertible derivative, differentiability of g=f−1 at f(z) gives Dg(f(z))=(Df(z))−1. In Wirtinger form, the real chain rule is (g∘f)z=(gw∘f)fz+(gwˉ∘f)fzˉ‾,(g∘f)zˉ=(gw∘f)fzˉ+(gwˉ∘f)fz‾, and the Wirtinger coefficients uniquely determine a real-linear map (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), The Wirtinger chain rule for compositions of real-differentiable complex-valued maps, The Wirtinger derivatives ∂zf and ∂zˉf, and antiholomorphic functions). The Beltrami coefficient and least-dilatation conventions are those of The Beltrami coefficient and the maximal dilatation.

[F4]

The local-homology multiplier of an invertible smooth derivative is its determinant sign (Smooth orientation sign is the local integral homology multiplier); the connecting-map identification in step 2.1 translates that multiplier into local winding. Smooth Euclidean inverse branches are supplied by Choice-free smooth inverse function theorem in Euclidean space. Stokes holds for C1 complex forms on bounded C1 Euclidean domains under AC (Stokes for complex forms on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain); rounding finitely many rectangle corners and then letting their radii shrink gives the rectangle-with-disks formula below. Measure uniqueness applies on a generating pi-system with a finite-measure exhaustion (Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system).

Proof

technique · obtain inverse regularity from the quadrilateral equivalence, establish the area formula for both maps, and then differentiate on a common full-measure set
1.1F1F2given

By [F1], g=f−1 is analytically K-quasiconformal independently of any area equality or inverse-null assumption. Both maps are orientation-preserving, belong locally to W1,2, and are differentiable almost everywhere by [F2].

2.1F1F2step 1.1construct

We prove area equality for either map u. On an interior rectangle, choose countable dense sets of good ACL horizontal and vertical levels. Their subrectangles form a basis with rectifiable Jordan image boundaries. These image boundaries have area zero: divide each finite-length arc into pieces of length at most δ, cover by squares of side 2δ, and let the total cost Cδ(length⁡+δ) tend to zero. Let D be such a closed rectangle and T⋐u(D∘). Smooth mollifications un converge uniformly on a neighborhood of D, with derivatives converging in L2; determinants Jn converge to Ju in L1, and since Ju≥0, the integrals of (Jn)− tend to zero. Uniform convergence makes the straight homotopy of the boundary images avoid every y∈T for large n. The positively oriented rectifiable Jordan contour u(∂D) has winding one at y: triangulate D into a singular2-chain, transport it by u, and apply naturality of the pair boundary map to its positive local orientation class. Excision identifies that class with the positive generator of H2(R2,R2∖{y}); the connector is an isomorphism because R2 is contractible, giving the positive punctured-plane H1 generator. Degree-one Hurewicz and the winding/degree identification give analytic winding one. This uses Long exact sequence of a pair, Naturality of the pair long exact sequence, Excision for singular homology, The first Hurewicz map is abelianization, For loops in C times, the winding number about 0 equals the circle degree, Winding number identifies the fundamental group of C times with the integers; translating by −y and a nonzero complex scaling normalizes the contour basepoint to1 without changing its integral. Thus un(∂D) also has winding one about T.

3.1F2F4step 2.1constructalgebra

For a regular value y of un away from its boundary, its fibre in D is finite. Delete disjoint small disks around these preimages. Round the four rectangle corners in neighborhoods avoiding its finite fibre, and apply C1 Stokes [F4] to the pulled-back closed angular form (−v du+u dv)/(2π(u2+v2)), after translating by y. This gives boundary winding as the sum of the small-circle windings. The corner-arc integrals tend to zero, since the form is bounded there and their lengths tend to zero; passage to the limit recovers the rectangle formula. Interpolation to the invertible derivative on each small circle makes each term sgn⁡Jn there. Hence a regular y∈T has signed fibre count1 and at least one positive-Jacobian preimage. Sard [F2] makes the exceptional target values null. Use the smooth local inverse theorem [F4] and a countable rational-basis cover to partition the open set {Jn>0}∩D∘ into disjoint Borel inverse-branch pieces. Nonnegative change of variables on each branch and countable additivity give ∫D(Jn)+≥∣T∣. Therefore ∫DJn≥∣T∣−∫D(Jn)−; passage to the limit and compact exhaustion of u(D∘) give ∫D∘Ju≥∣u(D∘)∣. The opposite lower area inequality is [F2]. On each chosen basis rectangle, its subrectangles from the same dense good levels, together with the whole rectangle, form a generating pi-system. Both restricted measures are finite and agree there, so [F4] applies with the constant whole-rectangle exhaustion. Countably many such rectangles cover the domain; disjointizing that cover extends equality to all relatively compact Borel sets. Exhaustion gives the area formula wherever needed. In particular u sends null Borel sets to null sets. Apply this argument to both f and the already-regular g. This supplies N and inverse-N without assuming either.

4.1F1F2F3step 3.1algebra

If fz vanished on a positive-area Borel set E inside a compact exhaustion, the Beltrami inequality would make Jf=0 there. Step 3.1 gives ∣f(E)∣=0, while the null-set property of g would force ∣E∣=0, a contradiction. Thus fz≠0 a.e. and Df is nonsingular a.e. The non-differentiability set of g has null preimage under g by the same null-set property, so almost every source point is a common differentiability point. At such a point the chain rule [F3] for g∘f=id⁡ gives 0=(gw∘f)fzˉ+(gwˉ∘f)fz‾ and the corresponding z equation equals1. Division yields μg(f(z))=−fzˉ(z)/fz(z)‾=−μf(z)fz(z)/fz(z)‾.

5.1F1F3step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

The modulus of the unimodular factor in step 4.1 is one. Null-set preservation in both directions transports the coefficient equality and its essential bounds, so ∥μg∥∞=∥μf∥∞ and Kg=Kf. Step 1.1 already supplies inverse Sobolev regularity, so the coefficient calculation does not circularly assume it. Repeating the result for g proves both directions of the final equivalence.

Remark

The area argument above proves, for every relatively compact Borel set E and either of the independently regular maps u=f or u=f−1, ∣u(E)∣=∫EJu dA. Consequently each map sends area-null Borel sets to null sets, and Jf>0 almost everywhere. The proof first obtains inverse regularity from quadrilateral equivalence, then proves this formula for both maps by ACL-selected rectangles and signed local winding. Neither inverse-null nor a later MRMT result is an input.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

157 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources