How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Excision for singular homology
Statement
If and , then inclusion induces isomorphisms for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: .
Proof
Use the cover : its cover-small quotient complex for consists, modulo small chains in , of precisely the small chains avoiding .
The two inclusions from their small complexes to the corresponding full relative complexes are chain homotopy equivalences. The quotient identification in step 1.1 therefore induces the stated isomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
- Good pairs and quotient reduced homology Corollary
- Excision fails without closure inside interior Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Theorem 2.20 (standard reference, not scraped)