Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Analytic quasiconformality gives both quadrilateral modulus bounds

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let f:Ω→Ω′ be an orientation-preserving analytically K-quasiconformal homeomorphism, K≥1, in the sense of The ACL and Sobolev analytic definition of quasiconformality. For every Jordan quadrilateral Q⋐Ω with either pair of opposite marked sides, write ΓQ for its joining family and Γf(Q) for the corresponding image family (Orientation-preserving homeomorphisms and the geometric definition of quasiconformality). Then K−1μ(ΓQ)≤μ(Γf(Q))≤Kμ(ΓQ), equivalently K−1λ(ΓQ)≤λ(Γf(Q))≤Kλ(ΓQ). This result supplies quadrilateral bounds; no inverse regularity, inverse null-set property or arbitrary-ring comparison is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the orientation-preserving analytic homeomorphism, its constant K, and a relatively compact marked Jordan quadrilateral.

[F1]

The analytic definition supplies Wloc1,2 and ACL coordinate representatives. The weak partials agree with their classical line derivatives. Put k=(K−1)/(K+1); the Wirtinger identities give Jf=∣fz∣2−∣fzˉ∣2≥0 and ∥Df∥op2≤KJf (The ACL and Sobolev analytic definition of quasiconformality, The Wirtinger derivatives ∂zf and ∂zˉf, and antiholomorphic functions, The ACL characterisation of W1,p). The smooth local-homology multiplier is the determinant sign (A real linear isomorphism preserves or reverses orientation according to the sign of its determinant, Smooth orientation sign is the local integral homology multiplier); step 2.1 transfers this to a homeomorphism at a nonsingular differentiability point by a nonvanishing boundary homotopy.

[F2]

Egorov and Lusin give uniform convergence and continuous restrictions on compact sets outside sets of arbitrarily small measure. One-dimensional differentiation and completed-product Fubini give density one on almost every horizontal and vertical slice of such sets (Egorov's theorem, Assuming countable choice, Lusin's theorem on finite-measure subsets of R^n, Lebesgue differentiation theorem on Rn, Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability).

[F3]

Differentiation of locally finite positive Borel measures identifies their absolutely continuous densities through small-ball ratios. Nonnegative change of variables holds for a C1 diffeomorphism (Differentiation of sigma-finite Borel measures finite on compact sets, A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

[F5]

Rectangle joining-family extremal lengths are its aspect ratio and reciprocal; the straight foliation has the same value by the identical slice estimate. Modulus is the infimum of density area under length admissibility, obtained by scaling the defining quotient. Family inclusion reverses extremal length; arc-length integration is invariant under parameterization (Extremal length of the rectangle and of the round annulus, Extremal length and the curve-family modulus of a path family, The rho-length and the extremal length are well defined, Conformal invariance, monotonicity, and the series and parallel laws for extremal length).

[F6]

Complex Hölder and Minkowski control products and sums in L2 (Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm). Countable Choice and the assumed AC permit the countable compact covers and subsequences used below (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Interior mollification and Lp approximate identities give derivative convergence; for continuous functions they converge uniformly on compacta (Interior mollification commutes with weak derivatives, Every L1 approximate identity converges to the identity in Lp for 1≤p<∞, L1 approximate identities converge uniformly on compacta for bounded continuous functions). The AC fundamental theorem is Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions.

Proof

technique · prove the lower area and exceptional-curve interfaces without an inverse, rectify quadrilaterals, and obtain the second inequality by transverse reciprocity
1.1F1F2givenconstruct

A continuous planar homeomorphism with finite partial derivatives almost everywhere is totally differentiable almost everywhere. Here are the needed details. On an interior rectangle, Egorov and Lusin give a compact set E outside arbitrarily small area on which the two partials are continuous and their directional difference quotients converge uniformly. The measurable error is the supremum over rational 0<∣t∣<1/n; continuity in nonzero t makes this the full supremum. By [F2], almost every p∈E is a density-one point of both coordinate slices. Translate p to 0, and put A(x+iy)=f(0)+xfx(0)+yfy(0). Uniform quotients and continuous partials give ∣f(w)−A(w)∣≤3ε∣w∣ whenever the horizontal or vertical projection of w belongs to the corresponding slice of E, for sufficiently small w. For any fixed z with r=∣z∣, slice density supplies rectangle sides at coordinates within εr on either side of each coordinate of z. Every boundary point w of that rectangle has one of the good projections. Openness of f makes the maximum of ∣f(w)−A(z)∣ occur on the boundary: A(z) is a fixed constant, and an open image cannot have an interior maximum of distance from it. Thus ∣f(z)−A(z)∣≤3ε(1+2ε)r+2ε(∣fx(0)∣+∣fy(0)∣)r. Let ε↓0. Taking compact sets with excluded area tending to zero proves the assertion; [F1] makes it applicable to f. No maximum principle for a variable affine difference is used.

1.2F2F3F5F6construct

We record the precise exceptional-curve argument. On each compact interior neighborhood mollify a continuous W1,2 map u to smooth un with uniform convergence and derivative convergence in L2. Choose a subsequence with ∑n∥Dun−Du∥2<∞ and put G=∑n∣Dun−Du∣+∣Du∣. This is in L2. Rectifiable curves with ∫γG=∞ have modulus zero, because G/m is admissible on them with area tending to zero. On every remaining curve, the derivatives of un∘γ converge in L1 to Du(γ)γ′ along arc-length parameterization; uniform convergence and the fundamental theorem of calculus identify the limit as the derivative of the absolutely continuous path u∘γ. Borel null representatives are handled by an infinite density on their null set. A countable compact exhaustion and positive summable multiples of the local barriers give one L2 barrier for all bad compact restrictions. If u has finite total energy on a bounded domain and extends continuously to its boundary, include ∣Du∣ in the barrier. Good boundary-joining paths then have finite derivative integral on the whole interval; local absolute continuity and endpoint continuity imply absolute continuity including endpoints. For an AC path, its variation on intervals is the integral of its speed, first by partitions and the fundamental theorem and then by differentiation. Uniqueness of measures and simple approximation therefore give the weighted arc-length identity for every nonnegative Borel density. This proves the chain-rule length inequality outside a modulus-zero family, not merely on coordinate lines.

1.3F4givenconstruct

Every marked Jordan quadrilateral rectifies to a rectangle. Map its interior to the upper half-plane with three marked boundary points normalized to 0,1,∞; the fourth is a<0, by [F4]. On the upper half-plane take a primitive P of 1/z(z−1)(z−a), choosing the analytic square root by a logarithm. Its derivative is nonzero. The inverse-square-root singularities at a,0,1 are integrable; at infinity the derivative is O(∣z∣−3/2), so the primitive has a common finite limit there. Each of the four real boundary intervals maps monotonically to a straight side; the directions alternate by π/2. Equality of the two limits at infinity closes the polygon, and its four positive side lengths give a rectangle with equal opposite sides. On upper half-disks indented about the three branch points, image boundaries converge to that rectangle boundary. The argument principle [F4] gives exactly one preimage for every interior point and none for an exterior point. Thus P is a conformal bijection, extending homeomorphically to the four sides.

2.1F1F3step 1.1givenalgebra

Define the positive locally finite Borel measure ν(E)=∣f(E)∣. At a differentiability point with invertible derivative A, the expansion f(p+v)=f(p)+Av+o(∣v∣) traps the image of a radius-r disk between the ellipses A(Dr) enlarged and contracted by o(r). The inner containment follows by Jordan separation, since the image boundary is an o(r) perturbation of the ellipse and has the same winding on its contracted interior. Hence its area ratio tends to ∣det⁡A∣. At a singular derivative the image is contained in an o(r) neighborhood of a bounded segment or point, so that ratio tends to zero. Since f preserves orientation, a nonsingular derivative has positive determinant: interpolation to Av on a small boundary circle preserves the local orientation sign. Measure differentiation [F3] therefore identifies ν's absolutely continuous density with Jf. Its singular part is nonnegative, giving ∫EJf≤∣f(E)∣ for every relatively compact Borel E. Simple approximation and exhaustion give ∫(g∘f)Jf≤∫g for every nonnegative Borel target function. This is only the lower area inequality.

2.2F3F4F5step 1.2step 1.3algebra

The rectangle map and its inverse have finite conformal energy: nonnegative change of variables on compact interior exhaustions gives ∫∣ϕ′∣2=∣Q∣ and the corresponding finite rectangle area for its inverse. Their boundary extensions are continuous. Step 1.2 therefore transports boundary-joining families outside modulus-zero exceptional families; the weighted length identity and the conformal area identity give invariance in both directions. Consequently [F5] transfers the rectangle joining-family values, equality with its straight foliation, and transverse reciprocity to every Jordan quadrilateral. This explicitly extends the compact-interior conformal-invariance supplier to the boundary families used here.

3.1F1F5F6step 2.1step 1.2algebra

Removing a zero-modulus family does not change modulus: add to any good-family admissible density a bad-family admissible density with arbitrarily small L2 norm and use Minkowski [F6]. A density of infinite length on all bad curves and arbitrarily small norm is obtained by summing a sequence of bad-family admissible densities with summable norms. Apply step 1.2 to f and a target admissible density τ. Its pullback ρ=(τ∘f)∥Df∥op satisfies A(ρ)≤KA(τ) by step 2.1 and [F1]. Weighted length on every good source curve is at least the target image length. Adding a vanishing-cost bad-family density gives μ(Γ)≤Kμ(fΓ), equivalently λ(fΓ)≤Kλ(Γ), for the compact-trace families used here. This establishes one direction only.

4.1F1F2F3F5step 2.1step 3.1step 2.2algebra

Rectify the source Q and take its straight joining foliation F. In conformal coordinates, f∘ϕ has finite energy on the whole rectangle: step 2.1 and ∥Df∥2≤KJf bound it by a constant times ∣f(Q)∣ after conformal change of variables. Sobolev coordinate change follows by mollification on compact subsets, the classical chain rule and L2 convergence there. Fubini gives a Borel null set N of bad leaf parameters; good leaves are AC on the entire closed interval with the weighted chain rule. The bad leaves have modulus zero: if the leaf width is w, the density w−11(0,w)×O for an open O⊃N has length one on each bad leaf and area ∣O∣/w→0. Removing them leaves the source foliation's value unchanged. The full target joining family contains the image good foliation. Step 3.1, or its identical good-leaf pullback, thus gives λ(Γf(Q))≤λ(fFgood)≤Kλ(Fgood)=Kλ(ΓQ). No claim that images of bad leaves have zero modulus is needed.

5.1F5step 2.2step 4.1algebra∎

Repeat step 4.1 for the transverse source foliation. By step 2.2 the two joining-family extremal lengths multiply to one in both quadrilaterals. Inverting the transverse upper bound therefore gives λ(Γf(Q))≥K−1λ(ΓQ). Their values are finite and positive because the rectifying rectangles are nondegenerate. Taking reciprocals gives both displayed modulus bounds. The second bound came from transverse reciprocity, not an assumed inverse-null property.

Remark

The local arguments used in this proof establish the following auxiliary interfaces under the stated AC assumption. A continuous planar homeomorphism with finite coordinate partial derivatives almost everywhere is totally differentiable almost everywhere. For an orientation-preserving such map, the image-area measure has absolutely continuous density Jf, so ∫EJf≤∣f(E)∣ on relatively compact Borel sets; the corresponding nonnegative weighted inequality follows by simple approximation and exhaustion. This is a lower inequality, not area equality or inverse-null.

For a continuous Wloc1,2 map, a summable-gradient mollification barrier gives the AC chain rule and the nonnegative Borel weighted speed identity on every rectifiable compact restriction outside a modulus-zero curve family. If its total energy is finite and it extends continuously to the boundary, including the total derivative in the barrier gives the same assertion on good compact boundary-joining paths. Jordan quadrilaterals rectify to nondegenerate rectangles, their straight joining foliation has the full joining-family extremal length, and their two transverse joining-family values multiply to one. These are the proved inputs used above; none grants a second arbitrary-family distortion bound or inverse regularity.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

243 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources