Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every holomorphic function on a homologically simply connected domain has a primitive

Statement

Let Ω be a homologically simply connected complex domain (Homologically simply connected complex domains). Then every holomorphic f:Ω→C has a primitive on Ω (A primitive of a complex function on an open set): there is a holomorphic F:Ω→C with F′=f.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A homologically simply connected complex domain Ω and a holomorphic f:Ω→C.

[L1]

If Γ is a cycle with trace in an open Ω, null-homologous in Ω, and f is holomorphic on Ω, then ∫Γf dz=0 (Cauchy's theorem for a null-homologous cycle).

[L2]

A complex domain is homologically simply connected when every cycle with trace in it is null-homologous in it (Homologically simply connected complex domains, Null-homologous cycles and homologous cycles in an open set).

[L3]

A list of closed complex contours is a cycle; in particular a single closed contour, taken as the list of length 1 with coefficient 1, is a cycle, and its trace is the trace of that contour (Complex chains, their traces, and cycles).

[L4]

For a chain consisting of the single closed contour γ with coefficient 1, ∫Γf dz=∫γf dz (Integration over a complex chain and the index of a chain).

[L5]

For a complex domain U and a continuous f:U→C, the following are equivalent: f has a primitive on U; the integral of f along rectifiable contours in U depends only on the endpoints; the integral of f around every closed rectifiable contour in U is 0 (For a continuous function on a complex domain, endpoint independence, zero closed-contour integrals, and existence of a primitive are equivalent).

[L6]

A complex differentiable function is continuous (Complex differentiability at a point implies continuity there).

[L7]

A complex domain is a nonempty, connected, open subset of C (A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of C).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL3

Let γ be a closed rectifiable contour with trace in Ω, and let Γ be the chain consisting of γ with coefficient 1. By [L3] that chain is a cycle whose trace is γ∗⊆Ω.

2.1step 1.1L1L2L4

By [L2] the cycle Γ is null-homologous in Ω, so [L1] gives ∫Γf dz=0, and [L4] rewrites this as ∫γf dz=0.

3.1givenstep 2.1L5L6L7∎

The set Ω is a complex domain by [L7] and f is continuous on it by [L6], so [L5] applies; step 2.1 supplies its third condition for every closed rectifiable contour in Ω, and the equivalence therefore yields a primitive F of f on Ω.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources