How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A unique Möbius transformation carries any ordered triple of distinct sphere points to any other
Statement
For any ordered triples and of distinct points of , there is a unique Möbius transformation with In particular every ordered triple of distinct sphere points can be normalized to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Two ordered triples and of distinct sphere points.
The inverse of a Möbius transformation is again Möbius (Every Möbius transformation is a biholomorphism of the Riemann sphere, Möbius transformations form a group and identify with the projective linear quotient of GL_2(C)).
Proof
Define and define by the same formula with replaced by . In each case the displayed formula is Möbius and direct substitution gives , , and , , .
The composition is Möbius by [L1] and carries to , so the required map exists.
If another Möbius map had the same three values, then composing with and would produce a Möbius map fixing , , and ; writing it as forces and then , so it is the identity. Thus the map is unique.
Depends on
Used by
- A Möbius transformation is recovered from three point correspondences Example
- FALSE: a Möbius transformation with three fixed points can be nonidentity False statement
- Möbius transformations preserve circlines and conjugate their reflections Theorem
- Nonidentity Möbius transformations are parabolic or conjugate to a dilation, with the projective trace invariant Theorem
- The cross-ratio is invariant under Möbius transformations Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lars V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 3 §§2.2-3.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Matthias Weber, Complex Analysis, Ch. 1 §§1.3-1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Elias M. Stein and Rami Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Ch. 8 §§1-2 (standard reference, not scraped)