Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Möbius ambiguity in conformal welding

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let D be the unit disk, T=∂D, and D∗=C^∖D‾. Let h:T→T be an orientation-preserving Möbius circle homeomorphism, and write H for its Möbius extension to the sphere. Then H preserves D and D∗. With f=idD and g=H∣D∗, the round circle is a welding curve for h. For example, h(ζ)=(ζ−a)/(1−a‾ζ) for a∈D is the boundary map of a disk automorphism and is welded by the round circle.

For a fixed h, simultaneous postcomposition of both parameter maps by a Möbius transformation leaves the welding map unchanged and carries the welding curve to its Möbius image. In particular, any two weldings of h with the round circle as curve differ by a common Möbius postcomposition.

Every welding curve for h is a Möbius image of T. Fixing the images of three distinct boundary points removes the common Möbius ambiguity and gives a unique normalized welding.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the unit disk, its exterior, and an orientation-preserving Möbius homeomorphism h of the boundary circle.

[F1]

In the library convention, a welding is a triple of complementary Jordan-domain parameter maps with boundary homeomorphisms, and its circle map is h=(f‾∣T)−1∘(g‾∣T) (The welding homeomorphism of a Jordan curve). The disk has counterclockwise positive boundary orientation and its exterior has clockwise positive boundary orientation (the same definition's orientation convention).

[F2]

The biholomorphic self-maps of D form Aut⁡(D); each is a rotated Blaschke factor, hence extends to a Möbius transformation preserving D and T. Since a Möbius map is a sphere homeomorphism, it then preserves the other complementary component D∗ (Conformal equivalence and the automorphism group of a domain, The unit disc, the upper half-plane, and Blaschke factors, Every automorphism of the disc is a rotated Blaschke factor, Möbius transformations of the Riemann sphere).

[F3]

A Möbius transformation is biholomorphic in the sphere charts and preserves the sphere orientation (Möbius transformations of the Riemann sphere, Every Möbius transformation is a biholomorphism of the Riemann sphere).

[F4]

The round circle T is globally conformally removable (Round circles and straight lines are conformally removable).

[F5]

If two conformal weldings have the same circle map and the first curve is globally conformally removable, a Möbius transformation postcomposes both parameter maps and carries the first curve to the second (Welding uniqueness for conformally removable curves, part (a)).

[F6]

A Möbius transformation is determined by its values at three distinct sphere points (A unique Möbius transformation carries any ordered triple of distinct sphere points to any other).

[F7]

Möbius transformations are closed under composition and inverse (Möbius transformations form a group and identify with the projective linear quotient of GL_2(C)).

[F8]

AC is the axiom assumed by the boundary and removability interfaces used in the welding definition and supplier results (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · construct the round welding directly, then use removability to identify the only remaining Möbius freedom
1.1F1F3given

The Möbius extension H carries T onto itself, so it permutes the two complementary components D and D∗. If H(D)=D∗, its orientation-preserving sphere map carries the counterclockwise boundary orientation of D to the clockwise boundary orientation induced by D∗; then h=H∣T would reverse the circle orientation. Since h is orientation-preserving, H(D)=D and H(D∗)=D∗.

1.2F1F7algebra

For any Möbius map M, postcomposition gives (M∘f)−1∘(M∘g)=f−1∘M−1∘M∘g=f−1∘g; the welding map is unchanged while the curve becomes M(Γ). Closure and inversion in [F7] make this composition calculation valid in the Möbius group.

1.3F4F5given

Let (T,f1,g1) and (T,f2,g2) weld the same h. The first curve is globally removable by [F4], so [F5] gives one Möbius map M with f2=M∘f1 and g2=M∘g1. Since both curves are T, M(T)=T. This proves the stated ambiguity for weldings with the round curve fixed.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

The maps f=idD and g=H∣D∗ are conformal bijections of the two complementary components and extend continuously to T. Therefore [F1] gives f−1∘g∣T=H∣T=h. In particular, for the displayed Blaschke map, its disk automorphism extension restricted to D∗ is the required exterior parameter map.

3.1F5F6F8step 2.1

Take any welding (Γ′,f′,g′) of h. Compare it by [F5] with the round welding (T,idD,H∣D∗) from step 2.1, using T first. Then Γ′=M(T) and both parameter maps are postcomposed by M. If two such weldings have the same images of three distinct boundary points under their first parameter map, their relative Möbius map fixes those three distinct points; [F6] forces it to be the identity. Hence the normalized maps and curve are unique. The inherited AC premise is recorded in [F8].

4.1F3step 3.1algebra∎

Write M(z)=(az+b)/(cz+d) with ad−bc≠0. For w=M(z), the condition ∣z∣=1 becomes ∣dw−b∣=∣a−cw∣, which is a nondegenerate circle equation or line equation in the finite plane; the line case includes ∞ on the sphere. Therefore every curve Γ′=M(T) is a generalized round circle, proving the Statement.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources