Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalization of a solution by a Möbius postcomposition

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. It implies Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Fix ν∈C with ∣ν∣<1, let μ be the sphere coefficient with finite-chart representative ν, and set A(z)=z+νzˉ on the finite complex domain (Measurable Beltrami coefficients and measurable conformal structures, A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of C, The standard holomorphic charts on the Riemann sphere, with holomorphy and poles at infinity, The Riemann sphere is the published one-point compactification of the complex plane).

(a) Evaluate the affine solution. On the sphere, A(0)=0, A(1)=1+ν, and A(∞)=∞. It is an orientation-preserving quasiconformal homeomorphism and is already normalized exactly when ν=0 (The ACL and Sobolev analytic definition of quasiconformality, Orientation-preserving homeomorphisms and the geometric definition of quasiconformality).

(b) Find the normalizing map. The unique Möbius map M sending (A(0),A(1),A(∞)) to (0,1,∞) is M(w)=w/(1+ν): a Möbius map fixing 0 and ∞ has the form M(w)=λw, and M(1+ν)=1 forces λ=1/(1+ν) (Möbius transformations of the Riemann sphere, A unique Möbius transformation carries any ordered triple of distinct sphere points to any other).

(c) Preserve the coefficient. The normalized composite is fν(z)=(M∘A)(z)=z+νzˉ1+ν. In the finite chart, its derivatives are fzν=1/(1+ν) and fzˉν=ν/(1+ν), so its coefficient is still ν and it solves fzˉ=μfz weakly on the sphere (The Wirtinger derivatives ∂zf and ∂zˉf, and antiholomorphic functions, The Beltrami coefficient and the maximal dilatation, Weak solutions of the Beltrami equation). It fixes 0,1,∞ and is the unique normalized solution by The measurable Riemann mapping theorem on the sphere. The Möbius map is biholomorphic in the sphere charts (Every Möbius transformation is a biholomorphism of the Riemann sphere).

(d) Every solution can be normalized. If f is any quasiconformal homeomorphic solution, the three points f(0),f(1),f(∞) are distinct. There is a unique Möbius map sending them to (0,1,∞); the composite is the normalized solution. Hence the full solution family is the set of Möbius postcompositions of fν (A unique Möbius transformation carries any ordered triple of distinct sphere points to any other, The measurable Riemann mapping theorem on the sphere).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; ν∈C with ∣ν∣<1; the sphere coefficient μ with finite-chart representative ν; and the affine map A(z)=z+νzˉ.

[F1]

AC implies Countable Choice, required by the coefficient, weak-solution and ACL interfaces (The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F2]
[F3]

Three-point transitivity gives a unique Möbius map carrying any ordered triple of distinct sphere points to any other such triple (A unique Möbius transformation carries any ordered triple of distinct sphere points to any other).

[F5]

The analytic quasiconformal definition for maps between complex domains requires Wloc1,2 and the differential inequality; the ACL characterization The ACL characterisation of W1,p identifies locally square-integrable coordinate-line derivatives of an ACL representative with weak derivatives; the Beltrami coefficient and maximal dilatation are determined by the two Wirtinger derivatives (A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of C, The ACL and Sobolev analytic definition of quasiconformality, The Beltrami coefficient and the maximal dilatation, The Wirtinger derivatives ∂zf and ∂zˉf, and antiholomorphic functions).

[F6]

A positive real determinant gives the positive local orientation sign, and the sign of a homeomorphism is locally constant in oriented charts (A real linear isomorphism preserves or reverses orientation according to the sign of its determinant, Orientation-preserving homeomorphisms and the geometric definition of quasiconformality).

[F7]

The normalized measurable Riemann mapping theorem supplies the unique normalized solution and says all solutions are its Möbius postcompositions (The measurable Riemann mapping theorem on the sphere). The stable global proof supplies exactly this normalization and classification interface.

Proof

technique · evaluate the affine map, solve the three normalization equations, and differentiate the normalized composite
1.1F2F5F6givenalgebra

Direct calculation gives Az=1, Azˉ=ν, JA=1−∣ν∣2>0, and A−1(w)=(w−νwˉ)/(1−∣ν∣2). Thus A is a real-linear homeomorphism of C; since ∣A(z)∣≥(1−∣ν∣)∣z∣, it extends by A(∞)=∞ to a sphere homeomorphism. Its affine coordinate-line restrictions are absolutely continuous with locally square-integrable derivatives. In source and target infinity charts its expression is a(w)=wwˉ/(wˉ+νw) for w≠0, with a(0)=0. The denominator has modulus at least (1−∣ν∣)∣w∣, so a is continuous at 0; its degree-one homogeneity and smoothness off 0 give bounded derivatives there. Integrating along segments, splitting at 0 if needed, makes a Lipschitz. Thus its coordinate-line restrictions are absolutely continuous with locally square-integrable derivatives, and [F5] gives local W1,2 in both charts. The pullback law [F2] transports the equation off 0, a null point. Hence A is analytically quasiconformal with coefficient ν and K=(1+∣ν∣)/(1−∣ν∣); [F6] gives orientation preservation. The values A(0)=0 and A(1)=1+ν show it is already normalized exactly when ν=0.

2.1F3F4step 1.1givenalgebra

Since ∣ν∣<1, 1+ν≠0. By [F3], there is a unique Möbius map M sending (0,1+ν,∞) to (0,1,∞). Write M(w)=(aw+b)/(cw+d) with ad−bc≠0. The conditions M(0)=0 and M(∞)=∞ force b=c=0, so M(w)=λw with λ=a/d≠0; then M(1+ν)=1 gives λ=(1+ν)−1. Thus M(w)=w/(1+ν), proving (b).

3.1F1F2F4F5F6F7step 1.1step 2.1given

Put fν=M∘A. In the finite chart, fzν=1/(1+ν) and fzˉν=ν/(1+ν), so fzˉν=νfzν and μfν=ν. It is a sphere homeomorphism fixing ∞; in the infinity coordinates w=1/z and η=1/fν(z) its expression is η(w)=(1+ν)wwˉwˉ+νw,η(0)=0. This is (1+ν)a(w), with a from step 1.1, so it has the same local W1,2 regularity by linearity of weak derivatives. The pullback law in [F2] transports the weak equation to the infinity chart, where the coefficient still has modulus ∣ν∣; [F5] gives the analytic quasiconformal inequality there. Thus fν is a quasiconformal sphere homeomorphism and weak solution; its three values are 0,1,∞. By [F7] it is the unique normalized solution, proving (c). The local orientation sign remains positive by [F6].

4.1F1F3F4F7step 3.1given∎

Let f be any quasiconformal homeomorphic solution. Its homeomorphism property makes f(0),f(1),f(∞) distinct. By [F3], the unique Möbius map carrying this triple to (0,1,∞) exists. By [F7], all solutions are Möbius postcompositions of fν and the normalized solution is unique; therefore the normalizing map is the inverse of the unique Möbius map in the family, and the full solution family has exactly the stated form.

Source notes

Lyubich, Ch. 2 §14.1, printed p. 196, was read in full for the Möbius ambiguity and three-point normalization. Bishop, Ch. 3 §2, printed p. 88, was read in full as context for the same normalization statement; its Theorem 2.11 proof invokes an unresolved “Theorem ??”, so the affine computation above does not rely on it.

Supplier reconciliation

The explicit maps and calculations above remain unchanged. Their exact normalized uniqueness and solution-family uses now consume the complete stable MRMT proof, and their analytic conventions consume the earlier12 definitions/equivalence. Root decisions and full-run certification are separate.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

127 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources