How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Square integrability of discrete-series matrix coefficients
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let and let and be the holomorphic and antiholomorphic discrete-series models of Holomorphic and antiholomorphic discrete-series models. Every matrix coefficient with K-finite belongs to for the fixed Haar measure in KAK integration formula for K-bi-invariant functions on SL2(R), for each of and . Moreover, each of and is unitarily equivalent to a closed -invariant subspace of the left regular representation on (Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; the holomorphic and antiholomorphic models for ; the fixed left Haar measure and KAK formula; and the left regular representation on .
In , , where , is a complete orthonormal K-basis, with , and every K-finite vector is a finite linear combination of the . The model is a strongly continuous unitary representation. These are the weighted-space and invariant-area conclusions (Holomorphic and antiholomorphic discrete-series models, The weighted discrete-series space is a Hilbert space with K-type basis, The weighted area form is SL2(R)-invariant); the norm constants are calculated in step 1.2.
The normalized extremal coefficient is , and coefficients between enveloping-algebra translates of obey the stated exponential decay (Matrix-coefficient formulas and decay for the discrete and principal series). The general polynomial formula needed below is derived in step 1.2.
For each continuous nonnegative K-bi-invariant , the fixed Haar measure satisfies with extended values (KAK integration formula for K-bi-invariant functions on SL2(R)).
The left regular action is and is a strongly continuous unitary representation on ; continuous unitary matrix coefficients use a pairing linear in the first variable (Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group, Matrix coefficient of a unitary representation).
If a sequence converges in , some subsequence of representatives converges almost everywhere to a representative of its limit (Assuming Countable Choice, -convergent sequences have almost-everywhere convergent subsequences).
A diffeomorphism between open Euclidean sets changes variables for nonnegative Lebesgue-measurable functions, and the real Jacobian of a holomorphic map is the squared modulus of its complex derivative (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions, The Jacobian determinant of a holomorphic map is and is positive exactly where ).
AC is the stated hypothesis for the weighted Hilbert model, normalized Haar data, and regular-representation Hilbert space (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Given: The assumptions and notation of the Statement.
By [F1], a finite-dimensional K-invariant span decomposes into finitely many characters of , and the corresponding character spaces in are precisely the lines . Hence every K-finite has finite expansions in this basis.
In the Cayley coordinate , put , so . Substitution of in the weighted integral gives : the factors are , , and . Polar integration therefore gives , where . For every real , write . The inverse-action formula in [F1] gives . Expand the polynomial numerator and the denominator by the geometric-series derivatives; since , the resulting power series converges absolutely and uniformly on . Its coefficient of is , with . Uniform convergence permits integration against ; angular orthogonality leaves precisely that coefficient times . Hence , and . At this agrees with [F2].
For basis vectors , step 1.2 and boundedness of the fixed polynomial on give for and , since each K-factor acts on its weight vector by a scalar of modulus one. Thus is a continuous K-bi-invariant function and [F3] gives its integral at most . For finite expansions and , the coefficient is the finite sum ; the pointwise Cauchy–Schwarz inequality bounds its squared modulus by . The latter is integrable as a finite sum, proving the assertion for all K-finite .
Put and define for K-finite . Unitarity gives , so step 2.1 shows ; linearity follows from the first-variable-linear pairing. For , step 1.2 gives . For , the K-eigenvector identities give , so this basis coefficient's modulus is K-bi-invariant.
Applying [F3] to and setting yields . Indeed, , , and reduces the radial integral to . Each is finite and positive, and . Also, . If , choose with ; unitarity of then gives , so this inner product is zero. Thus, for and every K-finite , .
The K-finite span is dense in by [F1]. Therefore extends uniquely by continuity to a linear isometry . Its image is closed: if converges, the isometry identity makes Cauchy, and completeness of gives a limit whose image is the stated range limit.
For any , choose K-finite . Then in , so [F5] gives a subsequence converging almost everywhere to a representative of . At every , unitarity gives ; hence is almost everywhere equal to . For , the coefficient identity holds almost everywhere, using preservation of null sets by left translation. Thus ; since is onto, the closed range of is G-invariant.
Complex conjugation is antiunitary and satisfies by the model definition. Complex conjugation on is antiunitary and commutes with , because acts by real-variable translation. The complex-linear map is therefore an isometric intertwiner of with , with closed G-invariant range. The same conjugation identity shows that every K-finite matrix coefficient of is the complex conjugate of one for , so it too lies in .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Smooth and K-finite vectors for SL2(R), and the (g,K)-module
- Holomorphic and antiholomorphic discrete-series models
- The weighted discrete-series space is a Hilbert space with K-type basis
- The weighted area form is SL2(R)-invariant
- KAK integration formula for K-bi-invariant functions on SL2(R)
- Matrix-coefficient formulas and decay for the discrete and principal series
- A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions
- The Jacobian determinant of a holomorphic map is $|f'|^2$ and is positive exactly where $f'\ne0$
- Matrix coefficient of a unitary representation
- Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group
- Assuming Countable Choice, $L^p$-convergent sequences have almost-everywhere convergent subsequences
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
76 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emmanuel Kowalski, An Introduction to the Representation Theory of Groups (AMS GSM 155; author's PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Matt Kerr, Notes on the Representation Theory of SL2(R) (CBMS workshop writeup) (standard reference, not scraped)