Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Square integrability of discrete-series matrix coefficients

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let n≥2 and let Dn−=(πn,Hn+) and Dn+=(πn−,Hn−) be the holomorphic and antiholomorphic discrete-series models of Holomorphic and antiholomorphic discrete-series models. Every matrix coefficient g↦⟨πn(g)v,w⟩ with v,w K-finite belongs to L2(G) for the fixed Haar measure in KAK integration formula for K-bi-invariant functions on SL2(R), for each of Dn− and Dn+. Moreover, each of Dn− and Dn+ is unitarily equivalent to a closed G-invariant subspace of the left regular representation λ on L2(G) (Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; the holomorphic and antiholomorphic models for n≥2; the fixed left Haar measure and KAK formula; and the left regular representation on L2(G).

[F1]

In Dn−, ej:=fn,j/Nj, where Nj=∥fn,j∥n, is a complete orthonormal K-basis, πn(kθ)ej=χj(kθ)ej with χj(kθ)=e−i(n+2j)θ, and every K-finite vector is a finite linear combination of the ej. The model is a strongly continuous unitary representation. These are the weighted-space and invariant-area conclusions (Holomorphic and antiholomorphic discrete-series models, The weighted discrete-series space is a Hilbert space with K-type basis, The weighted area form is SL2(R)-invariant); the norm constants are calculated in step 1.2.

[F2]

The normalized extremal coefficient is ⟨πn(at)e0,e0⟩=cosh⁡(t/2)−n, and coefficients between enveloping-algebra translates of e0 obey the stated exponential decay (Matrix-coefficient formulas and decay for the discrete and principal series). The general polynomial formula needed below is derived in step 1.2.

[F3]

For each continuous nonnegative K-bi-invariant ψ, the fixed Haar measure satisfies ∫Gψ(g) dg=2π∫0∞ψ(at)sinh⁡(t) dt with extended values (KAK integration formula for K-bi-invariant functions on SL2(R)).

[F4]

The left regular action is λ(h)f(g)=f(h−1g) and is a strongly continuous unitary representation on L2(G); continuous unitary matrix coefficients use a pairing linear in the first variable (Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group, Matrix coefficient of a unitary representation).

[F5]

If a sequence converges in L2(G), some subsequence of representatives converges almost everywhere to a representative of its limit (Assuming Countable Choice, Lp-convergent sequences have almost-everywhere convergent subsequences).

[F6]

A C1 diffeomorphism between open Euclidean sets changes variables for nonnegative Lebesgue-measurable functions, and the real Jacobian of a holomorphic map is the squared modulus of its complex derivative (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions, The Jacobian determinant of a holomorphic map is ∣f′∣2 and is positive exactly where f′≠0).

[A1]

AC is the stated hypothesis for the weighted Hilbert model, normalized Haar data, and regular-representation Hilbert space (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The assumptions and notation of the Statement.

1.1F1algebra

By [F1], a finite-dimensional K-invariant span decomposes into finitely many characters of K=SO(2), and the corresponding character spaces in Dn− are precisely the lines Cej. Hence every K-finite v,w∈Hn+ has finite expansions in this basis.

1.2F1F2F6algebraA1

In the Cayley coordinate w=(z−i)/(z+i), put Ff(w)=(z+i)nf(z), so Ffn,j=wj. Substitution of z=i(1+w)/(1−w) in the weighted integral gives ∥f∥n2=22−2n∫D∣Ff(w)∣2(1−∣w∣2)n−2dA(w): the factors are z+i=2i/(1−w), y=(1−∣w∣2)/∣1−w∣2, and ∣dz/dw∣2=4/∣1−w∣4. Polar integration therefore gives Nj2=22−2nπBj, where Bj=∫01xj(1−x)n−2dx. For every real t, write r=tanh⁡(t/2). The inverse-action formula in [F1] gives Fπn(at)fn,j(w)=cosh⁡(t/2)−n(w−r)j(1−rw)−n−j. Expand the polynomial numerator and the denominator by the geometric-series derivatives; since ∣r∣<1, the resulting power series converges absolutely and uniformly on ∣w∣≤1. Its coefficient of wk is cosh⁡(t/2)−nQjk(r), with Qjk(r)=∑p=0min⁡(j,k)(−1)j−p(jp)(n+j+k−p−1k−p)rj+k−2p. Uniform convergence permits integration against wˉk(1−∣w∣2)n−2; angular orthogonality leaves precisely that coefficient times Nk2. Hence ⟨πn(at)fn,j,fn,k⟩=cosh⁡(t/2)−nQjk(r)Nk2, and Qj0(r)=(−r)j. At j=k=0 this agrees with [F2].

2.1F1F3step 1.2algebra

For basis vectors ej,ek, step 1.2 and boundedness of the fixed polynomial Qjk on [−1,1] give ∣⟨πn(k1atk2)ej,ek⟩∣≤Cjkcosh⁡(t/2)−n≤2nCjke−nt/2 for k1,k2∈K and t≥0, since each K-factor acts on its weight vector by a scalar of modulus one. Thus ∣⟨πn(g)ej,ek⟩∣2 is a continuous K-bi-invariant function and [F3] gives its integral at most 2π(2nCjk)2∫0∞e−ntsinh⁡(t) dt≤π(2nCjk)2/(n−1)<∞. For finite expansions v=∑jvjej and w=∑kwkek, the coefficient is the finite sum ∑j,kvjwk‾⟨πn(g)ej,ek⟩; the pointwise Cauchy–Schwarz inequality bounds its squared modulus by (∑j,k∣vjwk‾∣2)∑j,k∣⟨πn(g)ej,ek⟩∣2. The latter is integrable as a finite sum, proving the assertion for all K-finite v,w.

3.1F1step 1.2step 2.1algebra

Put e0=fn,0/N0 and define Φ(v)(g):=⟨πn(g−1)v,e0⟩ for K-finite v. Unitarity gives Φ(v)(g)=⟨πn(g)e0,v⟩‾, so step 2.1 shows Φ(v)∈L2(G); linearity follows from the first-variable-linear pairing. For t≥0, step 1.2 gives Φ(ej)(at)=⟨πn(a−t)ej,e0⟩=N0Njtanh⁡(t/2)jcosh⁡(t/2)−n. For k1,k2∈K, the K-eigenvector identities give Φ(ej)(k1gk2)=χj(k1)−1χ0(k2)‾Φ(ej)(g), so this basis coefficient's modulus is K-bi-invariant.

4.1F1F3F4step 3.1algebraA1

Applying [F3] to ∣Φ(ej)∣2 and setting r=tanh⁡(t/2) yields ∥Φ(ej)∥22=2πB0Bj∫0∞tanh⁡(t/2)2jcosh⁡(t/2)−2nsinh⁡(t) dt=2πB0Bj 2Bj=4πB0=4πn−1. Indeed, sinh⁡(t)dt=4r(1−r2)−2dr, cosh⁡(t/2)−2n=(1−r2)n, and x=r2 reduces the radial integral to 2∫01xj(1−x)n−2dx=2Bj. Each Bj is finite and positive, and B0=1/(n−1). Also, (λ(kθ)Φ(ej))(g)=Φ(ej)(k−θg)=⟨πn(g−1kθ)ej,e0⟩=χj(kθ)Φ(ej)(g). If j≠k, choose θ with χj(kθ)≠χk(kθ); unitarity of λ then gives ⟨Φ(ej),Φ(ek)⟩=χj(kθ)χk(kθ)‾⟨Φ(ej),Φ(ek)⟩, so this inner product is zero. Thus, for Cn:=4π/(n−1) and every K-finite v=∑jvjej, ∥Φ(v)∥22=Cn∑j∣vj∣2=Cn∥v∥2.

5.1F1step 4.1algebraA1

The K-finite span is dense in Hn+ by [F1]. Therefore Cn−1/2Φ extends uniquely by continuity to a linear isometry Jn−:Hn+→L2(G). Its image is closed: if Jn−vm converges, the isometry identity makes (vm) Cauchy, and completeness of Hn+ gives a limit whose image is the stated range limit.

6.1F1F4F5step 5.1algebra

For any v∈Hn+, choose K-finite vm→v. Then Jn−vm→Jn−v in L2(G), so [F5] gives a subsequence converging almost everywhere to a representative of Jn−v. At every g∈G, unitarity gives ⟨πn(g−1)vm,e0⟩→⟨πn(g−1)v,e0⟩; hence Jn−v is almost everywhere equal to Cn−1/2⟨πn(g−1)v,e0⟩. For h∈G, the coefficient identity Cn−1/2⟨πn(g−1)πn(h)v,e0⟩=Cn−1/2⟨πn((h−1g)−1)v,e0⟩=(λ(h)Jn−v)(g) holds almost everywhere, using preservation of null sets by left translation. Thus Jn−πn(h)=λ(h)Jn−; since πn(h) is onto, the closed range of Jn− is G-invariant.

7.1F1F4step 6.1algebra∎

Complex conjugation C:Hn+→Hn− is antiunitary and satisfies Cπn(h)=πn−(h)C by the model definition. Complex conjugation CG on L2(G) is antiunitary and commutes with λ(h), because λ(h) acts by real-variable translation. The complex-linear map Jn+:=CGJn−C−1 is therefore an isometric intertwiner of Dn+ with λ, with closed G-invariant range. The same conjugation identity shows that every K-finite matrix coefficient of Dn+ is the complex conjugate of one for Dn−, so it too lies in L2(G).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

76 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources