Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The weighted discrete-series space is a Hilbert space with K-type basis

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). In the notation of Holomorphic and antiholomorphic discrete-series models, for every integer n≥2:

(1) Hn+ is a complex Hilbert space with inner product ⟨f,h⟩n=∫Hfhˉ yn−2dx dy, and point evaluations f↦f(z) are bounded, uniformly on compact subsets of H.

(2) The vectors fn,j, j≥0, are nonzero, mutually orthogonal, and have finite norm; their closed linear span is Hn+. The action of K on this Hilbert space is strongly continuous and its irreducible K-types are exactly the one-dimensional lines Cfn,j with characters χj(kθ)=e−i(n+2j)θ, each with multiplicity one. The analogous statements hold for Hn− with f~n,j and characters ei(n+2j)θ.

(3) For j≥0, the corresponding isotypic projection is the Bochner integral Pjf=∫Kχj(k)−1πn(k)f dk, where dk is normalized Haar probability; every f∈Hn+ is the orthogonal sum f=∑j≥0Pjf in Hilbert norm.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; n∈Z, n≥2; the weighted holomorphic and antiholomorphic spaces, action, and vectors of Holomorphic and antiholomorphic discrete-series models.

[F1]

The model action is a group action of norm-preserving maps; fn,j has K-character e−i(n+2j)θ; K=SO(2) with the fixed kθ (Holomorphic and antiholomorphic discrete-series models, Smooth and K-finite vectors for SL2(R), and the (g,K)-module).

[F2]

Write D={w∈C:∣w∣<1} for the unit disc and H={z∈C:Im⁡z>0} for the upper half-plane; nonnegative Lebesgue integrals obey change of variables under C1 diffeomorphisms (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

[F3]

A function holomorphic on a disc satisfies the Cauchy integral formula on every circle compactly contained in it (Cauchy's integral formula on a circle compactly contained in a disc of holomorphy), equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain (A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain), and its Taylor coefficients obey the Cauchy estimates ∣cn∣≤M/rn (Cauchy's inequalities bound the Taylor coefficients by the circle supremum); the coefficient bounds make the series converge absolutely and uniformly on every closed subdisc.

[F4]

A locally uniform limit of holomorphic functions on an open subset of C is holomorphic (Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic, with locally uniform convergence of all derivatives).

[F6]

Increasing limits of nonnegative measurable functions pass through the integral (Monotone convergence for the integral).

[F7]

A strongly continuous unitary representation of a compact group decomposes as a Hilbert direct sum of finite-dimensional irreducibles, and its type projections are the normalized character integrals (Unitary representations of compact groups are discrete Hilbert sums of irreducibles, Compact-group isotypic projection).

[F8]

Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration (Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The assumptions and notation of the Statement.

1.1F3A1algebra

Fix z0∈H and choose r>0 with D(z0,r)‾⊂H. The Cauchy formula and Cauchy–Schwarz on each circle centered at z0 give ∣f(z0)∣2≤(2π)−1∫02π∣f(z0+seit)∣2dt for 0<s<r; integrating with 2s/r2 yields ∣f(z0)∣2≤(πr2)−1∫D(z0,r)∣f∣2dA. Since yn−2 has a positive lower bound on this disk, ∣f(z0)∣≤Cz0,r∥f∥n. If z∈D(zi,ri/2), then D(z,ri/2)⊂D(zi,ri); applying the same estimate there and using a lower bound for the weight on D(zi,ri) gives a uniform evaluation bound on D(zi,ri/2). A finite subcover of any compact C⊂H therefore gives one constant CC for all z∈C.

1.2F2F5algebra

Set w=(z−i)/(z+i) for z∈H. Then ∣w∣2−1=−4y/∣z+i∣2<0, so w∈D, and solving w=(z−i)/(z+i) gives the inverse z=i(1+w)/(1−w) with Im⁡z=(1−∣w∣2)/∣1−w∣2>0 for w∈D; hence z↦w is a bijection H→D. Since z+i=2i/(1−w) and dz/dw=2i/(1−w)2, the real Jacobian of w↦z is ∣dz/dw∣2=4/∣1−w∣4, and [F2] gives ∥f∥n2=22−2n∫D∣F(w)∣2(1−∣w∣2)n−2dA(w) for F(w):=(z+i)nf(z). For fn,j one has F(w)=(z−i)j(z+i)−j=wj, and consequently ∥fn,j∥n2=22−2n2π∫01ρ2j+1(1−ρ2)n−2dρ, which is finite since (1−ρ2)n−2≤1 and ∫01ρ2j+1dρ=(2j+2)−1, and is positive since the integrand is positive on (0,1). Distinct monomials are orthogonal because ∫02πei(j−k)θdθ=0 for j≠k.

2.1F4F5step 1.1algebraA1

On R2 give the measure μn the density 1H(x,y)yn−2 relative to Lebesgue measure, and extend functions on H by zero below the real axis. The map Hn+→ the weighted square-integrable function space for μn is injective: a zero class has norm zero, and the estimate of step 1.1 then makes every point value zero. The integral pairing thus restricts to a positive-definite inner product. If (fm) is Cauchy in this norm, [F5] gives a limit class h; step 1.1 makes (fm) uniformly Cauchy on every compact subset of H, so it converges locally uniformly to a holomorphic f by [F4]. On each compact Q⋐H, the density is bounded and Q has finite area, so local uniform convergence gives convergence in the restricted weighted integral norm on Q. Restriction of fm→h to Q and uniqueness of limits imply f=h a.e. on Q. The compact exhaustion Qm={z:∣z∣≤m, Im⁡z≥1/m} covers H, so f=h a.e. globally; hence f∈Hn+ and ∥fm−f∥n→0. Thus Hn+ is a complex Hilbert space.

2.2F3F6step 1.2algebraA1

Expand F(w)=∑j≥0ajwj by [F3]. For each 0<ρ<1 this series converges uniformly on ∣w∣=ρ; integrating finite partial sums and using orthogonality of exponentials, then taking the uniform limit, gives (2π)−1∫02π∣F(ρeiθ)∣2dθ=∑j≥0∣aj∣2ρ2j. Integrating radially and applying [F6] to the increasing finite partial sums yields ∫D∣F(w)∣2(1−∣w∣2)n−2dA(w)=∑j≥0∣aj∣2 2π∫01ρ2j+1(1−ρ2)n−2dρ. This sum is finite by step 1.2; applying the same identity to F−∑j=0Najwj shows that the squared norm of the remainder is its series tail, which tends to zero. Thus the fn,j have dense algebraic span in Hn+, and step 1.2 makes them a complete orthogonal family.

3.1F1step 2.2algebra

In the disk coordinate the K-action is Fπn(kθ)f(w)=e−inθFf(e−2iθw). The orbit map of each polynomial in w is therefore norm-continuous. The maps πn(k) are isometries by [F1], and polynomials are dense by step 2.2; approximating f by a polynomial p and using ∥πn(k)f−πn(k0)f∥n≤2∥f−p∥n+∥πn(k)p−πn(k0)p∥n proves strong continuity on all of Hn+. Since each πn(k) has inverse πn(k−1), this is a strongly continuous unitary representation of compact K.

4.1F1F7step 2.2step 3.1algebra

The compact-group decomposition [F7] applies by steps 2.1 and 3.1. Its irreducible K-types are finite-dimensional; because K=SO(2) is abelian, the commuting unitary operators on any such finite-dimensional space have a common eigenline, and irreducibility forces that line to be the whole space. Thus every K-type is a character line. The complete orthogonal family from step 2.2 consists of eigenvectors with distinct characters χj(kθ)=e−i(n+2j)θ by [F1]. An eigenvector for a different character is orthogonal to every fn,j by unitarity and therefore vanishes by density. Each listed isotypic subspace is exactly Cfn,j, since it is orthogonal to all other character lines and the family is complete.

5.1F7F8step 1.1step 2.2step 3.1A1∎

For each j, [F7] gives the type projection Pjf=∫Kχj(k)‾πn(k)f dk, where χj‾=χj−1. The point-evaluation map Ez:f↦f(z) is bounded by step 1.1, so [F8] lets it pass through the Bochner integral. In disk coordinates, the scalar integrand is ∑ℓ≥0aℓwℓχj(k)‾χℓ(k) by step 3.1; for fixed ∣w∣<1 this series converges uniformly in k. Haar invariance makes the integral of every nontrivial character zero (translate by an element where its value is not 1), while the trivial character has integral 1. Thus Ez(Pjf) corresponds to ajwj, so Pjf=ajfn,j. The Hilbert expansion of step 2.2 is therefore f=∑j≥0Pjf. Complex conjugation gives the same Hilbert and K-type conclusions for Hn−.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

152 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources