How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Unitary representations of compact groups are discrete Hilbert sums of irreducibles
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a compact Hausdorff group and let be a strongly continuous unitary representation on a complex Hilbert space . For let be the closed span of all closed -invariant subspaces of on which restricts to a representation unitarily equivalent to ; equivalently for the isotypic projection of Compact-group isotypic projection (Isotypic projections are mutually orthogonal equivariant projections). Then:
- is a Hilbert direct sum of pairwise orthogonal closed invariant subspaces (Hilbert direct sums of unitary representations);
- each nonzero is a (possibly infinite) Hilbert direct sum of copies of the finite-dimensional irreducible ; in particular every irreducible strongly continuous unitary representation of is finite dimensional;
- the projections are the orthogonal projections onto the summands .
Facts & Assumptions
Every nonzero strongly continuous unitary representation of contains a nonzero finite-dimensional closed invariant subspace. (Every nonzero unitary representation of a compact group has a finite-dimensional subrepresentation)
Every finite-dimensional continuous unitary representation of is a direct sum of finitely many irreducible subrepresentations, so each nonzero finite-dimensional invariant subspace contains a nonzero irreducible invariant subspace. (Complete reducibility of finite-dimensional compact-group representations)
The orthogonal complement of a closed invariant subspace of a unitary representation is closed and invariant, and for a closed subspace . (Invariant orthogonal complements in unitary representations, Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace, Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement)
Zorn's lemma: a nonempty partially ordered set in which every chain has an upper bound has a maximal element. (Zorn's lemma, The Axiom of Choice)
Every irreducible strongly continuous unitary representation of is finite dimensional, its class lies in the unitary dual , and an irreducible subrepresentation of a copy of is again a copy of . (Irreducible unitary representations of compact groups are finite dimensional, The unitary dual of a compact group)
The isotypic projections: is a bounded self-adjoint idempotent commuting with , its range is the -isotypic subspace , the closed span of all -copies, and ranges belonging to inequivalent classes are mutually orthogonal; a -copy is a closed invariant subspace on which restricts to a representation unitarily equivalent to . Consequently is the orthogonal projection onto . (Compact-group isotypic projection, Isotypic projections are mutually orthogonal equivariant projections)
Hilbert direct sums: for a family of pairwise orthogonal closed invariant subspaces with closed linear span , the representation is the Hilbert direct sum of the restrictions, and a direct sum of copies of a fixed representation is again a Hilbert direct sum of those subrepresentations. (Hilbert direct sums of unitary representations)
Inequivalent irreducible subrepresentations have no nonzero bounded intertwiner, so their intersection is zero and their orthogonal projections onto one another vanish; equivalently, a nonzero bounded intertwiner between irreducible representations forces unitary equivalence. (Schur lemma for complex unitary representations, Every finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space has an orthonormal basis)
Proof
Given: AC, a compact Hausdorff group , and a strongly continuous unitary representation of on ; if every is , every , and the assertions are immediate, so assume .
Let be the set of all sets of pairwise orthogonal nonzero closed finite-dimensional -invariant subspaces on which restricts irreducibly, ordered by inclusion; is nonempty because by [F1] contains a nonzero finite-dimensional closed invariant subspace, which by [F2] contains a nonzero irreducible invariant subspace. Every chain in has the upper bound , which lies in because any two of its members lie in a common member of the chain and are therefore orthogonal, while none of them is zero; hence by Zorn [F4] there is a maximal . Its members are pairwise orthogonal closed invariant subspaces, so their closed linear span is their Hilbert direct sum and is -invariant, being the closed span of invariant subspaces.
If , then is a nonzero closed invariant subspace by [F3], and [F1] applied to provides a nonzero finite-dimensional closed invariant subspace ; by [F2] contains a nonzero irreducible invariant subspace , which is orthogonal to every member of because it lies in , so is a strictly larger member of , contradicting maximality; hence , that is, is the Hilbert direct sum of the family . Each member is an irreducible representation of , hence finite dimensional with class by [F5]; writing and , the are pairwise orthogonal closed invariant subspaces with closed linear span , so and each nonzero is the Hilbert direct sum of the copies of ; this proves (1) and the first clause of (2), while the finite-dimensionality of every irreducible representation of is [F5].
The grouped subspace from step 2.1 is contained in the closed span of all -copies. Conversely, let be any -copy. For each of class , the orthogonal projection commutes with , because and are invariant [F3]. Thus is a bounded intertwiner between inequivalent irreducibles and is zero by [F8]. Hence is orthogonal to every such , and therefore to their closed span. The orthogonal decomposition of step 2.1 implies that the complement of this closed span is exactly , so . Taking closed spans gives . By [F6], is the orthogonal projection onto this subspace, proving (3). AC is used in Zorn's lemma, the Haar-based projections and the cited suppliers.
Depends on
- Hilbert direct sums of unitary representations
- Every nonzero unitary representation of a compact group has a finite-dimensional subrepresentation
- The unitary dual of a compact group
- Compact-group isotypic projection
- Isotypic projections are mutually orthogonal equivariant projections
- Complete reducibility of finite-dimensional compact-group representations
- Irreducible unitary representations of compact groups are finite dimensional
- Zorn's lemma
- The Axiom of Choice
- Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners
- Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement
- Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace
- Every finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space has an orthonormal basis
- Hilbert space
- Invariant orthogonal complements in unitary representations
- Schur lemma for complex unitary representations
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
104 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emmanuel Kowalski, An Introduction to the Representation Theory of Groups (author-hosted draft, 338 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Constantin Teleman, Representation Theory (Berkeley lecture notes, 60 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- David A. Vogan, Review of Harmonic Analysis on Compact Groups (MIT lecture notes, 12 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)