How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Invariant orthogonal complements in unitary representations
Statement
Let be a topological group, let be a strongly continuous unitary representation of on a complex Hilbert space (Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners, Hilbert space), and let be a closed invariant subspace. Then the orthogonal complement (Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement) is a closed invariant subspace of . This assertion is choice free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a topological group , a strongly continuous unitary representation on a complex Hilbert space , and a closed invariant subspace .
Each is a bijective isometry with , so for all ; and is invariant, meaning for every . (Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners)
For a subset of an inner-product space, for every is a linear subspace, and orthogonality is symmetric. (Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement, Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length)
The inner product is jointly continuous, so for each fixed the map is continuous. (The inner product is jointly continuous)
In a metric space open balls are open, arbitrary unions of open sets are open, and a set is closed exactly when its complement is open; consequently is closed in , since its complement is the union of the open balls over . (Arbitrary unions and finite intersections of open sets are open, open balls are open and closed balls are closed, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement)
A closed set is the complement of an open set, and arbitrary intersections of closed sets are closed because arbitrary unions of open sets are open. (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison)
Proof
Let , and . Then , and because ; hence and , so . Replacing by gives as well, so : the complement is invariant.
The complement of in is the union over of the sets , each of which is the preimage under the continuous map of the open set ; a union of open sets is open, so the complement of is open and is closed.
Together with the fact that is a linear subspace, steps 1.1 and 1.2 show that is a closed invariant subspace of , with no use of any choice principle.
Depends on
- Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners
- Hilbert space
- Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement
- Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length
- The inner product is jointly continuous
- The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement
- Arbitrary unions and finite intersections of open sets are open, open balls are open and closed balls are closed
- Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emmanuel Kowalski, An Introduction to the Representation Theory of Groups, §§5.2–5.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vera Serganova, Representation Theory, Chapter III §§1.6–2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)