Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Averaging a Hermitian form unitarizes a finite-dimensional compact-group representation

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let K be a compact Hausdorff topological group (Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not) with normalized Haar probability measure μ (Normalized Haar probability on a compact group). Let V be a finite-dimensional complex vector space, let ρ:K→GL⁡(V) be a continuous finite-dimensional complex representation of K (A finite-dimensional representation ρ:G→GL⁡(V) over a field, and its degree), let h0 be a Hermitian inner product on V that is linear in the first variable and conjugate-linear in the second (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length, Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument), and let h(v,w):=∫Kh0(ρ(k)v,ρ(k)w) dμ(k) be the averaged form of the pair (ρ,h0) (Averaged Hermitian form for a compact group). Then

  1. h(v,v)>0 for every v∈V with v≠0; that is, h is positive definite, and
  2. h(ρ(g)v,ρ(g)w)=h(v,w) for every g∈K and all v,w∈V; that is, h is K-invariant.

Consequently h is an inner product on V, and every ρ(g) is a unitary operator of the finite-dimensional inner product space (V,h) (Linear isometries, and orthogonal or unitary operators on finite-dimensional inner product spaces), so the representation ρ is unitary for the averaged form h.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a compact Hausdorff group K with normalized Haar probability μ, a continuous finite-dimensional complex representation ρ:K→GL⁡(V), a Hermitian inner product h0 on V linear in the first variable, and the averaged form h.

[F1]

The averaged form is well defined: h is a sesquilinear form on V, linear in the first variable and conjugate-linear in the second, it is Hermitian in the sense h(v,w)=h(w,v)‾, the integrand k↦h0(ρ(k)v,ρ(k)w) is continuous on K for all v,w∈V, and a continuous complex function on the compact space K is bounded and integrable against the Borel probability measure μ, so the defining integral is a finite complex number (Averaged Hermitian form for a compact group).

[F2]

Normalized Haar: μ is a Borel probability measure with μ(K)=1 that is left and right invariant, μ(aE)=μ(E) and μ(Ea)=μ(E) for every Borel set E⊆K and every a∈K, and μ(U)>0 for every nonempty open U⊆K (Normalized Haar probability on a compact group, Haar measure is positive on nonempty open sets and finite on compact sets, Measure spaces).

[F3]

The form h0 is an inner product: it is linear in the first variable, conjugate-linear in the second, Hermitian, and positive definite, h0(v,v)≥0 with h0(v,v)=0 exactly for v=0; its induced length is ∥v∥h:=h(v,v) for any inner product h (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length, Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument).

[F4]

ρ is a group homomorphism with ρ(e)=IV and ρ(kg)=ρ(k)ρ(g) for all k,g∈K, and each ρ(g) is an invertible linear map of V; the map ρ:K→GL⁡(V) is continuous (A finite-dimensional representation ρ:G→GL⁡(V) over a field, and its degree).

[F5]

A continuous self-map T of the measure space (K,B(K),μ) is Borel measurable, and it is measure preserving when μ(T−1E)=μ(E) for every Borel E; in that case ∫Kf∘T dμ=∫Kf dμ for every integrable f (Measure-preserving transformations and systems, Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps). Right translation Tg(k):=kg is a homeomorphism because multiplication in a topological group is continuous (Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous), and by [F2] it is measure preserving: Tg−1E=Eg−1 has μ(Eg−1)=μ(E).

[F6]

Nonnegative measurable real functions have an extended integral that is monotone and positively homogeneous, and for nonnegative simple functions it agrees with the simple integral ∫∑jcjχEj dμ=∑jcjμ(Ej); in particular ∫c 1U dμ=c μ(U) for c≥0. For a real measurable f≥0 the Lebesgue integral of f equals this nonnegative integral, since the negative part vanishes (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions, The integral of a nonnegative simple function, Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals).

[F7]

A linear map T:V→W between inner product spaces is a linear isometry if ∥Tv∥=∥v∥ for every v, and an invertible linear isometry from a finite-dimensional complex inner product space to itself is a unitary operator (Linear isometries, and orthogonal or unitary operators on finite-dimensional inner product spaces).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3F4

Fix v,w∈V and put fv,w(k):=h0(ρ(k)v,ρ(k)w) for k∈K. By [F1] the function fv,w is continuous on K, hence its integral against μ is a finite complex number, and by [F4] ρ(e)=IV, so fv,w(e)=h0(v,w). If v≠0, then fv,v is real-valued with fv,v(e)=h0(v,v)>0 and fv,v≥0 pointwise, by [F3].

2.1F1F4F5step 1.1

Let g∈K and v,w∈V. Substituting the pair (ρ(g)v,ρ(g)w) into the defining integral of [F1], using the homomorphism property ρ(k)ρ(g)=ρ(kg) of [F4] and the notation of step 1.1, gives h(ρ(g)v,ρ(g)w)=∫Kh0(ρ(kg)v,ρ(kg)w) dμ(k)=∫Kfv,w(kg) dμ(k). The right translation Tg(k)=kg is a measure-preserving homeomorphism by [F5], and fv,w is continuous hence integrable, so the integral invariance theorem of [F5] gives ∫Kfv,w(kg) dμ(k)=∫Kfv,w(k) dμ(k)=h(v,w). Hence h(ρ(g)v,ρ(g)w)=h(v,w) for all g∈K and v,w∈V.

2.2F1F2F6F8step 1.1

Let v∈V with v≠0, put f:=fv,v and ε:=h0(v,v)/2>0, and let U:=f−1[(ε,∞)]. Since f is continuous by [F1] and (ε,∞) is open in R, [F8] shows that U is open in K; and e∈U because f(e)=h0(v,v)>ε by step 1.1, so U is nonempty. By step 1.1, f≥0 everywhere and f>ε on U, so f≥ε1U pointwise. Monotonicity and the indicator computation of [F6] applied to the real nonnegative function f give h(v,v)=∫Kf dμ≥∫Kε1U dμ=ε μ(U)>0, the final inequality by positivity of μ on the nonempty open set U in [F2]. Hence h is positive definite.

3.1F1F3F4F7step 2.1step 2.2∎

By [F1] the form h is sesquilinear and Hermitian; step 2.2 makes it positive definite, so h is an inner product on V, and step 2.1 makes h invariant under every ρ(g). Hence for every g∈K and v∈V one has h(ρ(g)v,ρ(g)v)=h(v,v), so the induced lengths of [F3] satisfy ∥ρ(g)v∥h=∥v∥h: each ρ(g) is a linear isometry of the finite-dimensional inner product space (V,h). Each ρ(g) is invertible by [F4], so [F7] makes every ρ(g) a unitary operator for h. Thus h is a positive-definite K-invariant Hermitian form on V, and the representation ρ is unitary for the averaged form h.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources