Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A circle representation with an averaged orthogonal weight form

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let S1={z∈C:∣z∣=1} be the unit circle with the subspace topology inherited from C≅R2, made a group by complex multiplication; let V=C2, and for z∈S1 let ρ(z)∈GL⁡(V) be given by ρ(z)(v1,v2)=(v1,zv2), so that ρ(z)=diag⁡(1,z) is a continuous finite-dimensional complex representation of S1 (A finite-dimensional representation ρ:G→GL⁡(V) over a field, and its degree, Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous). Let h0(v,w):=2v1w1‾+v1w2‾+v2w1‾+3v2w2‾ (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length), a Hermitian inner product on V whose matrix is (2113), and let h be its average over the normalized Haar probability measure μ of S1, h(v,w):=∫S1h0(ρ(z)v,ρ(z)w) dμ(z) (Averaged Hermitian form for a compact group, Normalized Haar probability on a compact group). Then:

  1. h(v,w)=2v1w1‾+3v2w2‾ for all v,w∈V;
  2. the coordinate (weight) lines Ce1 and Ce2, on which ρ acts by the characters z↦1 and z↦z, are orthogonal for the averaged form h, since h(e1,e2)=0, but not for h0, since h0(e1,e2)=1;
  3. h0 is not S1-invariant, because h0(ρ(−1)e1,ρ(−1)e2)=−1≠1=h0(e1,e2), whereas h is S1-invariant and positive definite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; the unit circle S1={z∈C:∣z∣=1} with the subspace topology of C≅R2 and complex multiplication; the representation ρ(z)=diag⁡(1,z) on V=C2; the form h0 above; the normalized Haar probability μ of S1; and its averaged form h.

[F1]

C is a field with the usual coordinate-plane model: the map Φ(a+bi)=(a,b) is a bijection carrying products to (au−bv,av+bu), and conjugation is an involutive field automorphism with zz‾=∣z∣2 and ∣zw∣=∣z∣ ∣w∣, so z−1=z‾ whenever ∣z∣=1 (C=R[x]/(x2+1) is a field, every element is uniquely a+bi, and every nonzero element has inverse (a−bi)/(a2+b2), C is the real coordinate plane, with coordinate arithmetic, Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).

[F2]

Topology toolkit: a map into a product is continuous exactly when its coordinates are; real addition and multiplication are jointly continuous (by specializing vector operations to the real normed space R), and restrictions and composites of continuous maps are continuous for the subspace and product topologies (A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice, The product set ∏i∈IXi of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space, Vector addition and scalar multiplication are continuous in a normed space, Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous, Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace, Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and f(A‾)⊆f(A)‾). A subset of R2 with the Euclidean metric is compact exactly when it is closed and bounded, with no choice principle (Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement, The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies), and metric spaces are Hausdorff (Distinct points of a metric space have disjoint balls around them, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not).

[F3]

Normalized Haar measure: a compact Hausdorff group has a unique left Haar probability μ, which is right invariant and inversion invariant (Normalized Haar probability on a compact group), positive on every nonempty open set and finite on compact sets (Haar measure is positive on nonempty open sets and finite on compact sets, Measure spaces).

[F4]

Averaged forms: for a continuous finite-dimensional complex representation of a compact Hausdorff group and a Hermitian inner product h0 linear in the first variable, the averaged form is well defined, sesquilinear and Hermitian, and its integrand is continuous and integrable (Averaged Hermitian form for a compact group).

[F5]

Integral tools: the Lebesgue integral is linear on integrable functions (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ), Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals), and a for integrable real or complex f, a measure-preserving self-map T satisfies ∫f∘T dμ=∫f dμ (Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps, Measure-preserving transformations and systems).

[F6]

The averaged form of [F4] is positive definite and invariant under the representation, so in the present example h is an inner product on V with h(ρ(z)v,ρ(z)w)=h(v,w) for all z∈S1 (Averaging a Hermitian form unitarizes a finite-dimensional compact-group representation, Linear isometries, and orthogonal or unitary operators on finite-dimensional inner product spaces).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2

The set S1 is a compact Hausdorff topological group. It contains 1 and is closed under multiplication and inversion because ∣zw∣=∣z∣ ∣w∣ and z−1=z‾ with ∣z‾∣=∣z∣ by [F1]; associativity and the remaining group axioms are inherited from the field C. In the coordinate plane, multiplication has the polynomial formula (a,b,u,v)↦(au−bv,av+bu) and inversion the formula (a,b)↦(a,−b) on ∣z∣=1, so both operations are continuous on the product S1×S1 respectively on S1 by [F2]. Moreover S1 is the preimage of {1} under the continuous map (a,b)↦a2+b2, hence closed in R2, and it is bounded because a2+b2=1; by Heine–Borel [F2] it is compact, and it is Hausdorff as a subspace of a metric space.

2.1F1step 1.1

The map ρ is a continuous finite-dimensional complex representation of S1 on V=C2, and h0 is a Hermitian inner product on V. Indeed ρ(z)ρ(w)=diag⁡(1,zw)=ρ(zw) and ρ(1)=I, each ρ(z)=diag⁡(1,z) is invertible because z≠0, and z↦ρ(z) is continuous as a map into the finite-dimensional space End⁡(V) because its matrix entries are continuous and all norms on that space are equivalent (All norms on a finite-dimensional complex normed space are equivalent). The form h0 has the real symmetric matrix (2113), hence is conjugate-symmetric, and h0(v,v)=2∣v1∣2+2Re⁡(v1v2‾)+3∣v2∣2≥∣v1∣2+2∣v2∣2>0 whenever v≠0, because 2Re⁡(v1v2‾)≥−(∣v1∣2+∣v2∣2); in particular h0(e1,e2)=1.

2.2F3F5step 1.1

The integrals of the characters vanish: ∫S1z dμ(z)=0 and ∫S1z‾ dμ(z)=0. Both characters are continuous and have modulus one, hence are integrable against the probability μ. The map j(z):=−z=(−1)⋅z is a continuous self-map of S1 with j−1(E)=(−1)E, so μ(j−1E)=μ(E) by left invariance of [F3]: it is measure preserving, and [F5] gives ∫z dμ=∫(−z) dμ=−∫z dμ, hence ∫z dμ=0; replacing z by z‾, whose composite with j is −z‾, gives ∫z‾ dμ=−∫z‾ dμ=0 in the same way.

3.1F1F4step 2.1

For z∈S1 one has ρ(z)v=(v1,zv2) and ∣z∣2=1, so expanding h0 in [F4] gives h0(ρ(z)v,ρ(z)w)=2v1w1‾+z‾ v1w2‾+z v2w1‾+3∣z∣2v2w2‾=2v1w1‾+3v2w2‾+z‾ (v1w2‾)+z (v2w1‾) for all v,w∈V.

4.1F4F5step 3.1step 2.2

Integrating the expansion of step 3.1 and pulling out the constants viwj‾ by linearity of the integral [F5] yields h(v,w)=∫S1(2v1w1‾+3v2w2‾+z‾ v1w2‾+z v2w1‾)dμ(z)=2v1w1‾+3v2w2‾+(∫z‾ dμ)v1w2‾+(∫z dμ)v2w1‾=2v1w1‾+3v2w2‾ by step 2.2.

5.1F6step 2.1step 4.1∎

Consequences. By step 4.1, h(e1,e2)=0, while h0(e1,e2)=1 by step 2.1: the two weight lines are orthogonal for h but not for h0. Since ρ(z)e1=e1 and ρ(z)e2=ze2, the invariance failure is visible at z=−1: h0(ρ(−1)e1,ρ(−1)e2)=h0(e1,−e2)=−h0(e1,e2)=−1≠1=h0(e1,e2), conjugate-linearity in the second variable producing the sign. The averaged form h is positive definite and S1-invariant by [F6], in agreement with the explicit formula of step 4.1.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

128 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources