How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Each vector has at most countably many nonzero isotypic components
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a compact Hausdorff group and let be a strongly continuous unitary representation of on a complex Hilbert space , with isotypic decomposition (Unitary representations of compact groups are discrete Hilbert sums of irreducibles). For every the set of classes whose isotypic component meets nontrivially is at most countable, where is the orthogonal projection of to . In particular each single has nonzero components in at most countably many isotypic summands of the Peter-Weyl decomposition (Peter-Weyl decomposition of the regular representation). No countability of and no countability of a Hilbert basis of is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
The isotypic decomposition of an arbitrary representation: is a Hilbert direct sum of pairwise orthogonal closed invariant subspaces, the are the ranges of the orthogonal projections , and every with occurs as the class of a subrepresentation. (Unitary representations of compact groups are discrete Hilbert sums of irreducibles, Hilbert direct sums of unitary representations)
For a family in a Hilbert space whose squared norms have finite finite-subset-supremum , the set is at most countable: for each the set is finite, because a nonempty finite subset contributes more than to while a finite subsum never exceeds , so every finite subset of has at most elements and hence itself is finite; the support is the countable union of the , at most countable by Countable Choice supplied by AC. (Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space , Hilbert space)
For in the Hilbert direct sum, the components satisfy in the finite-subset-supremum convention, and the component in the summand is the orthogonal projection . (Hilbert direct sums of unitary representations, Unitary representations of compact groups are discrete Hilbert sums of irreducibles)
The regular representation of on has Peter-Weyl decomposition , where is the span of the matrix coefficients of and , so the same countable-support conclusion applies to the components of a single class. (Peter-Weyl decomposition of the regular representation, Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family)
Proof
Given: AC, a compact Hausdorff group , a strongly continuous unitary representation of on , and a vector .
Let be any family in a Hilbert space with in the finite-subset-supremum convention [F2]; for each put and let be a nonempty finite subset with elements: then , while every finite subsum is at most the supremum , so ; consequently every finite subset of has at most elements, which forces to be finite (an infinite would contain a finite subset with at least elements), and the support is at most countable by Countable Choice supplied by AC.
Applying step 1.1 to the components of in the Hilbert direct sum is legitimate because by [F3], so the set of with is at most countable and the component is the orthogonal projection ; and applying it to the components of a class in the Peter-Weyl decomposition of [F4] gives the stated special case, because the squared norms of the components have finite sum equal to . No countability of the index sets or of a Hilbert basis is used or asserted. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the decomposition theorems and the cited suppliers.
Depends on
- Unitary representations of compact groups are discrete Hilbert sums of irreducibles
- Peter-Weyl decomposition of the regular representation
- Hilbert direct sums of unitary representations
- Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space $\ell^2(I)$
- Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family
- Hilbert space
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
62 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emmanuel Kowalski, An Introduction to the Representation Theory of Groups (author-hosted draft, 338 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- David A. Vogan, Review of Harmonic Analysis on Compact Groups (MIT lecture notes, 12 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)