Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

KAK integration formula for K-bi-invariant functions on SL2(R)

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and use the conventions of Iwasawa and minimal-parabolic data for SL2(R). Fix the left Haar measure dg of Iwasawa decomposition and Haar integration formula for SL2(R), so in NAK coordinates it is e−s dx ds dk with normalized Haar probability dk on K. Write at=diag⁡(et/2,e−t/2) for t≥0.

For every continuous nonnegative K-bi-invariant function ψ:G→[0,∞), the following equality holds for extended nonnegative integrals: ∫Gψ(g) dg=2π∫0∞ψ(at)sinh⁡(t) dt.

Consequently, for every continuous complex-valued K-bi-invariant function φ and p∈{1,2}, ∫G∣φ(g)∣p dg=2π∫0∞∣φ(at)∣psinh⁡(t) dt, with extended values; thus φ∈Lp(G) exactly when the radial integral is finite. If φ∈L1(G), the same formula holds for the absolutely convergent complex integral of φ. More generally, if φ is continuous and satisfies φ(k1gk2)=χ1(k1)χ2(k2)φ(g) for continuous unitary characters χi:K→S1, then ∣φ∣ is K-bi-invariant and the same L1 and L2 criteria apply.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; G=SL2(R), K=SO(2), at, and nx as in Iwasawa and minimal-parabolic data for SL2(R); and the normalized left Haar measure of Iwasawa decomposition and Haar integration formula for SL2(R).

[F1]

Every self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional real inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis (Real spectral theorem: a self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional real inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis).

[F2]

In NAK coordinates the fixed Haar measure is dg=e−s dx ds dk, where dk is normalized probability on K (Iwasawa decomposition and Haar integration formula for SL2(R)).

[F3]

A C1 diffeomorphism between open Euclidean sets changes variables for every nonnegative Lebesgue-measurable integrand (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

[F5]

For p∈{1,2}, φ∈Lp(G) means ∫G∣φ∣p dg<∞ (Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions, Left Haar integral and left Haar measure).

Proof

Given: The group and Haar measure above, and the continuous functions appearing in the Statement.

Proof technique: direct.

1.1F1algebra

Let g∈G and put A=gTg. This is a positive definite symmetric endomorphism of R2, so [F1] gives an orthonormal eigenbasis with eigenvalues λ+≥λ−>0. Since λ+λ−=det⁡(gTg)=1, one has λ+≥1 and λ−=λ+−1. Choose the eigenbasis matrix U∈SO(2), changing the sign of one basis vector if needed, and set t=log⁡λ+≥0 and S=UatUT. Then S2=A and det⁡S=1. The matrix k=gS−1 satisfies kTk=S−1AS−1=I and det⁡k=1, so k∈K and g=kUatUT is a KAK factorization. Moreover tr⁡(gTg)=et+e−t=2cosh⁡t, so this nonnegative parameter t is uniquely determined by g.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

For a nonnegative continuous K-bi-invariant ψ, [F2] and ∫Kdk=1 give ∫Gψ(g) dg=∫R∫Rψ(nxas)e−s dx ds. Set y=es>0 and z=x+iy. Direct multiplication gives tr⁡((nxas)T(nxas))=(x2+y2+1)/y. Define w=(z−i)/(z+i) and ρ=∣w∣<1. Then 1−ρ2=4y/(x2+(y+1)2) and 1+ρ2=2(x2+y2+1)/(x2+(y+1)2). For r=2artanh⁡ρ≥0, this gives cosh⁡r=(1+ρ2)/(1−ρ2)=(x2+y2+1)/(2y). The unique KAK parameter of nxas therefore equals r by step 1.1, so ψ(nxas)=ψ(ar). Since e−sds=dy/y2, the integral reduces to ∫y>0ψ(ar(x,y)) dx dy/y2.

3.1F3F4step 2.1algebra

The inverse Cayley map is z=i(1+w)/(1−w); it satisfies Im⁡z=(1−∣w∣2)/∣1−w∣2 and ∣dz/dw∣2=4/∣1−w∣4. Hence dx dy/y2=4 du dv/(1−∣w∣2)2 for w=u+iv. On the disk with the nonnegative real radius removed, w=ρeiθ is a C1 diffeomorphism from (0,1)×(0,2π) with Jacobian ρ; the omitted radius is a countable union of compact subsegments on which the weight is bounded, and the origin is a singleton, so both have zero weighted measure. By [F3]–[F4], and with r=2artanh⁡ρ so dρ=(1−ρ2)dr/2, one has 4ρ dρ dθ/(1−ρ2)2=2ρ dr dθ/(1−ρ2)=sinh⁡(r) dr dθ. The integrand is independent of θ, whose interval has length 2π. This proves the extended radial identity, including the zero function and the endpoint r=0, which contributes no atom.

4.1F5step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

Apply the nonnegative identity to ∣φ∣p for p=1,2 to obtain both extended Lp formulas and their finiteness criteria by [F5]. When φ∈L1, its real and imaginary positive and negative parts are continuous nonnegative K-bi-invariant functions; applying the identity to those four parts and recombining gives the absolutely convergent formula for φ. For the character-equivariant case, ∣χi(k)∣=1, hence ∣φ(k1gk2)∣=∣φ(g)∣, and the same Lp conclusions follow.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources