Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Iwasawa decomposition and Haar integration formula for SL2(R)

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and use the notation of Iwasawa and minimal-parabolic data for SL2(R).

(1) Diffeomorphism. Multiplication K×A×N⟶G,(k,a,n)⟼kan, is a diffeomorphism. For g=(prqs)∈G, put a=p2+q2,k=a−1(p−qqp),x=pr+qsa2. Then a>0, k∈K, a=et/2 for a unique t∈R, and g=kdiag⁡(a,a−1)nx is the unique factorization with k∈K, diag⁡(a,a−1)∈A, and nx∈N.

(2) Haar integral. With normalized Haar probability dk on K and Lebesgue measures dt on A≅R and dx on N≅R, f⟼∫K∫R∫Rf(katnx)et dx dt dk is a left Haar integral on G. In the opposite order the same measure is ∫K∫R∫Rf(nxatk)e−t dx dt dk.

(3) Unimodularity. The group G is unimodular; both displayed Haar integrals are right invariant as well.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the matrix group G=SL2(R).

[F1]

G,K,A,N, the matrices at,nx, and normalized dk are fixed in Iwasawa and minimal-parabolic data for SL2(R). The displayed parametrization identifies K with the circle R/2πZ.

[F2]

Under θ↦[θ/(2π)], the Lebesgue fundamental-domain probability on R/Z of The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral pulls back to the translation-invariant probability dθ/(2π) on K; uniqueness of normalized Haar probability identifies it with dk (Normalized Haar measure on a compact Lie group).

[F3]

Every invertible real matrix has a unique QR factorization with an orthogonal factor and an upper-triangular factor with positive diagonal (Every invertible real or complex square matrix has a unique factorisation A=QR with Q orthogonal or unitary and R upper triangular with positive real diagonal).

[F4]

A smooth bijection with smooth inverse is a diffeomorphism; smoothness is checked in the matrix and angle coordinates (Cr and smooth maps between smooth manifolds, Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds).

[F5]

dt and dx are Lebesgue measures; integration of a compactly supported smooth density changes by the absolute Jacobian under a diffeomorphism (Lebesgue measurable sets, the family L(Rn), and the restricted set function λn, Change of variables on oriented manifolds).

[F6]

A left Haar integral is a nonzero positive left-invariant functional; a left Haar measure is a nonzero Radon measure finite on compact sets (Left Haar integral and left Haar measure).

[F7]

A left Haar measure is also a right Haar measure exactly when G is unimodular (Unimodular locally compact group).

[F8]

Under ACω, a finite-valued positive smooth density on a second-countable smooth manifold defines a Radon measure finite on compact sets (Positive smooth densities give Radon volume).

[F9]

Under ACω, Borel integration against this density measure agrees with its chart-density integral; for smooth compactly supported functions this is the smooth density integral (Measurable integration extends smooth density integration).

[F10]

A measurable transformation preserving a measure preserves integrals of nonnegative measurable and integrable functions (Measure-preserving transformations and systems, Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps).

[F11]

The Lebesgue integral is real- and complex-linear on L1 (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

[A1]

AC supplies normalized Haar probability on K and, by restriction to any countable family, the ACω hypotheses for [F8] and [F9]. The matrix and Jacobian calculations make no other arbitrary choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3algebra

Write g=QR by [F3]. Since det⁡g=1 and R has positive diagonal, det⁡Q=1, so Q∈K. Writing a=R11>0 and R12=ax, the determinant condition gives R22=a−1 and R=diag⁡(a,a−1)nx. The first column gives a=p2+q2 and Q=a−1(p−qqp); the second gives x=(pr+qs)/a2. QR uniqueness proves the factorization unique.

2.1F4step 1.1algebra

Multiplication is smooth. Its inverse is given by the displayed formulas, with a>0 because the first column of a determinant-one matrix is nonzero; a, a−1, k, and x therefore depend smoothly on g. The coordinate t=2log⁡a is smooth as well, so the multiplication map is a diffeomorphism.

3.1A1F1F2F5step 2.1algebra

For fixed g0∈G, write uniquely g0kθ=kθ1au(θ)nv(θ). With e1=(1,0)T, put w(θ)=g0kθe1=r(θ)kθ1e1, where r=eu/2>0. Since det⁡(kθe1,(kθe1)′)=−1 and det⁡g0=1, differentiating this identity gives −1=−r2θ1′, hence θ1′=e−u>0. Left translation sends (kθ,t,x) to (kθ1,t+u,x+e−tv); its (t,x)-Jacobian is 1, so its full orientation-preserving Jacobian is e−u. The target density is et+udk dt dx, and its pullback is et+ue−udk dt dx=etdk dt dx. Thus the smooth density is left invariant; the change-of-variables theorem applies to compactly supported smooth test densities.

4.1A1F6F8F9F10F11step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Let η=etdk dt dx be the positive smooth density in the global K×R2 chart. By [F8] it defines a Radon Borel measure μη finite on compact sets, and [F9] identifies its Borel integral with the displayed coordinate integral. Step 3.1 makes μη left invariant. A nonnegative smooth bump supported in a nonempty coordinate box has positive integral because η is positive, so I(f):=∫f dμη is nonzero. It is positive and real-linear by the Lebesgue integral properties, and [F10] gives left invariance of I; hence I is a left Haar integral and μη is a left Haar measure by [F6].

5.1F1F7F8step 2.1step 4.1algebra

Put H=diag⁡(1,−1), e=(0100), f=(0010), J=(01−10), and S=(0110). Direct conjugation gives Ad⁡(kθ)J=J, Ad⁡(kθ)H=cos⁡(2θ)H−sin⁡(2θ)S, and Ad⁡(kθ)S=sin⁡(2θ)H+cos⁡(2θ)S, so its determinant is 1. Also Ad⁡(at) has eigenvalues 1,et,e−t on (H,e,f). On (e,H,f), Ad⁡(nx)e=e, Ad⁡(nx)H=H−2xe, and Ad⁡(nx)f=f+xH−x2e, so its determinant is 1. Since Ad⁡ is multiplicative and G=KAN, det⁡Ad⁡(g)=1 for every g∈G. For a left-invariant density η, comparing dRg with dLg−1 at the identity gives dLg−1dRg=Ad⁡(g−1), hence Rg∗η=∣det⁡Ad⁡(g−1)∣η=η. Thus μη is right invariant and G is unimodular by [F7].

6.1A1F1F2F8F9F10step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

Inversion pulls the right-invariant density η back to a left-invariant density; its differential at the identity is −I on the three-dimensional tangent space, whose absolute determinant is 1. Since a left-invariant density is determined by its value at the identity, inversion preserves μη. Applying inversion invariance to the KAN integral and using (katnx)−1=n−xa−tk−1, then substituting (k,t,x)↦(k−1,−t,−x), gives the same measure in NAK coordinates with density e−tdk dt dx; here dk=dθ/(2π) is inversion invariant by [F2].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

106 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources