Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The invariant pairing between opposite principal-series parameters

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let ε∈{0,1} and ν∈C. The sesquilinear pairing ⟨f,h⟩=∫Kf(k)h(k)‾ dk between the smooth compact-picture spaces Cε∞(K) of Iε,−νˉ and Iε,ν is G-invariant: (Π−νˉ(g)f,Πν(g)h)=(f,h)(f,h∈Cε∞(K), g∈G). For real ν it pairs Iε,−ν with Iε,ν; on the K-type basis fn of K-type decomposition of the SL2(R) principal series, ⟨fm,fn⟩=δmn.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, ε∈{0,1}, ν∈C, and smooth compact-picture vectors f,h.

[F1]

The compact-picture action is (Πλ(g)u)(k)=∣α(p(k,g))∣1+λu(κ(k,g)) for u∈Cε∞(K), where kg=p(k,g)κ(k,g) is the canonical AN×K factorization. Here the AN factor has trivial M-character (The compact picture of the SL2(R) principal series).

[F2]

The NAK coordinates are smooth global coordinates; using atnx=netxat converts them by a smooth coordinate change into the unique smooth ANK coordinates (Iwasawa decomposition and Haar integration formula for SL2(R), Iwasawa and minimal-parabolic data for SL2(R)).

[F3]

The model parameter and its normalized inducing character are fixed by The normalized principal series I(epsilon, nu).

[F4]

The parity basis is fn(kθ)=einθ for n≡ε(mod2), and is orthonormal for normalized Haar measure on K (K-type decomposition of the SL2(R) principal series).

[F5]

Under kθ↦[θ/(2π)]∈R/Z, normalized Haar probability on K is dk=dθ/(2π): the torus definition gives this normalized translation-invariant probability, and uniqueness of normalized Haar probability identifies its pullback with dk (Iwasawa and minimal-parabolic data for SL2(R), The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral, Normalized Haar measure on a compact Lie group).

[F6]

An orientation-preserving diffeomorphism of the circle preserves the integral of a smooth top form; every smooth top form on compact K has compact support (Change of variables on oriented manifolds).

[F9]

The integral of a complex function is defined by integrating its real and imaginary parts and combining the two real integrals (Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals).

[F10]
[A1]

AC supplies normalized Haar probability on compact K and implies the countable-choice hypothesis for the torus measure; no vector is selected in this proof (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), Normalized Haar measure on a compact Lie group).

Proof

technique · direct Jacobian calculation in the compact coordinate
1.1F1F2F5F6F8F9A1algebra

For fixed g=(abcd)∈G, write kθg=at(θ)nx(θ)kψ(θ) in the unique smooth ANK coordinates [F2], using the compact-picture notation [F1]. The bottom row of kθg is v(θ)=(−asin⁡θ+ccos⁡θ,−bsin⁡θ+dcos⁡θ)=e−t(θ)/2(−sin⁡ψ(θ),cos⁡ψ(θ)), so its norm is e−t/2=∣α(p(kθ,g))∣−1. Direct differentiation gives det⁡(v,v′)=ad−bc=1, while det⁡((−sin⁡ψ,cos⁡ψ),(−cos⁡ψ,−sin⁡ψ))=1; therefore e−t(θ)ψ′(θ)=1, or ψ′(θ)=et(θ)=∣α(p(kθ,g))∣2>0. If kg=p(k,g)κ(k,g) with p(k,g)∈AN, then κ(k,g)g−1=p(k,g)−1k; uniqueness of the same coordinates gives κ(κ(k,g),g−1)=k, and the reversed identity gives the inverse map, so κ(⋅,g) is an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism. By [F5], dk=dθ/(2π). For a smooth complex F, [F8] makes Re⁡F and Im⁡F smooth; apply [F6] separately to the compactly supported real top forms (Re⁡F)dθ/(2π) and (Im⁡F)dθ/(2π) and combine by [F9]. This yields ∫K∣α(p(k,g))∣2F(κ(k,g)) dk=∫KF(k) dk.

2.1F1F3F7F9F10step 1.1algebra

By [F1] and [F3], Π−νˉ(g)f contributes e(1−νˉ)t/2f(κ), while the conjugate of Πν(g)h contributes e(1+νˉ)t/2h(κ)‾ by [F7]; their product is ∣α∣2f(κ)h(κ)‾. Apply step 1.1 with F=fh‾ to obtain ⟨Π−νˉ(g)f,Πν(g)h⟩=∫Kf(k)h(k)‾ dk. The compact Haar probability and smoothness make these integrals finite by [F9]–[F10].

3.1F4F5F9F10algebra∎

For m,n≡ε(mod2), [F4]–[F5] give ⟨fm,fn⟩=(2π)−1∫02πei(m−n)θ dθ, which equals 1 when m=n and 0 otherwise by direct integration. For real ν, −νˉ=−ν, giving the stated opposite-parameter pairing.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

144 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources