How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The compact picture of the SL2(R) principal series
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let , , and let be as in The normalized principal series I(epsilon, nu). Write and define by the same parity condition in .
(1) Smooth compact picture. Restriction is a linear isomorphism from the smooth covariant functions of onto . For any factorization with and , its inverse is The parity condition makes this independent of the ambiguity. The unique positive-diagonal factorization gives the canonical formula . This isomorphism intertwines right translation with the Iwasawa-cocycle action where is the unique factorization; in this canonical factorization and .
(2) Unitary case. If , the inducing character is unitary. Restriction carries the normalized induced inner product to on . The resulting representation is strongly continuous and unitary, and is equivalent to the right-covariant model of in Unitary induction from a closed subgroup. Under inversion and the rho half-density, the parameter remains in that unitary model.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, , , and the normalized principal series from part (1).
The subgroups, characters, modular conventions, normalized Haar measure , and coordinates on are fixed by Iwasawa and minimal-parabolic data for SL2(R).
Multiplication gives unique smooth and coordinates; the Haar density in coordinates is , and is unimodular (Iwasawa decomposition and Haar integration formula for SL2(R)).
The smooth model has left -covariance by and right-translation action; is unitary for (The normalized principal series I(epsilon, nu)).
The unitary induction model uses continuous right--covariant functions, the rho quotient norm, and its Hilbert completion (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).
A rho-function satisfies (Rho-function for a closed subgroup).
The group modular functions are continuous homomorphisms; their convention is fixed by Modular function of a locally compact group and The modular function is a continuous homomorphism.
For closed , is locally compact Hausdorff, the quotient map is continuous, and subgroup averaging sends to (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
A positive functional on is integration against a Radon measure (Positive functionals on C_c(X) are integration against a Radon measure).
For fixed left Haar measures and a rho-function, the Weil formula gives a unique Radon quotient measure (Weil formula with a rho-function).
If the inducing character is unitary, the completed covariant model with its cocycle action is a strongly continuous unitary representation (Unitary induction from a closed subgroup).
The quotient Radon–Nikodym cocycle is , and its square root corrects the left action (Continuous quotient translation cocycle).
Trigonometric polynomials are finite linear combinations of the circle characters (Fourier coefficients and trigonometric polynomials on the torus).
Trigonometric polynomials are uniformly dense in continuous functions on the circle (Trigonometric polynomials are uniformly dense in continuous functions on the torus).
Continuous functions are dense in on the finite torus with normalized Haar measure (Continuous functions are dense in of finite tori and of bounded intervals).
Normalized Haar measure on a compact Lie group is right-translation and inversion invariant (Normalized Haar measure on a compact Lie group).
A left Haar measure is a nonzero left-invariant Borel Radon measure finite on compact sets, and Lebesgue measure on is Radon under (Left Haar integral and left Haar measure, Lebesgue measure is a Radon measure on R^n).
The Axiom of Choice supplies the normalized Haar measure and is assumed by the Weil, cocycle, and unitary-induction suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).
AC implies the countable-choice hypothesis used by the Fourier-density suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
By [F2], write each uniquely as . Since , this is also the unique smooth factorization with . Thus restriction to is injective on the induced function model, because covariance determines on every .
By [F2], write uniquely and set . For , direct multiplication using centrality of gives ; hence by [F1], [F2], and [F6]. Thus is a positive continuous rho-function by [F5], and for . The continuous map , , is onto because ; therefore is compact by [F7] and [F8]. Define on . This is positive and , so [F9] represents it by a Radon probability , the pushforward of . Give left Haar measure by normalized counting on and on ; left multiplication by sends to with Jacobian , and is central. The Radon property follows from [F17] and finite disjoint union over . For , subgroup averaging [F7] makes a member of . The Weil formula [F10], applied to , gives . With instead, the right side is , since is right--invariant by [F16]. This is the KAN Haar integral [F2], so uniqueness in [F10] gives .
Identify with the circle by . On continuous functions the projection has norm at most and range . By [F14], trigonometric polynomials approximate each continuous function uniformly; applying gives parity trigonometric polynomials approximating each continuous parity function uniformly. By [F15], continuous functions are dense in ; applying the same bounded projection, which is an contraction by [F16], shows continuous parity functions are dense in . Therefore parity trigonometric polynomials, which are -finite by [F13], are dense in .
If , its -covariance gives for . Conversely, for define in the unique coordinates. Left multiplication by changes to and the factor remains fixed; left multiplication by replaces by and multiplies by . Thus and is smooth. For any factorization with , centrality of gives the same canonical factorization , so ; this proves the inverse formula and shows its independence of the -ambiguity.
For , define . By [F5] and [F6], , since . Also , so cancels the modular factor and gives . The resulting continuous section has compact quotient support because is compact by step 1.2. For , direct substitution yields by [F12]. Hence intertwines right translation on the left-covariant model with the cocycle-corrected left action on the right--covariant model of ; the parameter remains .
The quotient norm of is, by [F10] and step 1.2, . Inversion invariance of normalized Haar measure [F16] makes this , so restriction is isometric for the normalized induced inner product.
For , factor by the canonical coordinates. Then . In a general factorization the same value is ; the parity relation makes this independent of the -choice. Since is central, replacing by leaves fixed and replaces by , so the formula preserves the parity- subspace. This is the stated Iwasawa-cocycle action, with in the canonical coordinates.
The coordinate construction in step 2.1, together with the inverse of from step 2.2, identifies continuous right--covariant sections with continuous parity- functions on . Step 2.3 identifies their quotient norm with the norm, and step 1.3 shows the smooth parity functions are dense in ; thus the compact-picture isometry extends onto the completed induced Hilbert space. By [F11], is strongly continuous and unitary because is a continuous unitary character for . The intertwining identity in step 2.2 transfers these properties to the compact-picture action.
Depends on
- Iwasawa and minimal-parabolic data for SL2(R)
- Iwasawa decomposition and Haar integration formula for SL2(R)
- The normalized principal series I(epsilon, nu)
- Continuous covariant model and measurable completion
- Rho-function for a closed subgroup
- The modular function is a continuous homomorphism
- Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)
- A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism
- Positive functionals on C_c(X) are integration against a Radon measure
- Left Haar integral and left Haar measure
- Modular function of a locally compact group
- Weil formula with a rho-function
- Unitary induction from a closed subgroup
- Continuous quotient translation cocycle
- Fourier coefficients and trigonometric polynomials on the torus
- Trigonometric polynomials are uniformly dense in continuous functions on the torus
- Continuous functions are dense in $L^p$ of finite tori and of bounded intervals
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The Axiom of Choice
- Lebesgue measure is a Radon measure on R^n
- Normalized Haar measure on a compact Lie group
Used by
- The spherical complementary series converge to the trivial representation Corollary
- The unitary dual of SL2(R) is non-discrete and non-Hausdorff at the stated limits Corollary
- The standard intertwining operator A(nu) Definition
- The two limits of discrete series Definition
- Parameter identifications in the SL2(R) unitary dual Example
- Derived action and raising/lowering formulas in the compact picture Lemma
- Fell continuity of the unitary principal series in the parameter Lemma
- Highest- and lowest-weight submodules at the exceptional parameters Lemma
- K-finite vectors detect nonzero closed invariant subspaces Lemma
- K-type decomposition of the SL2(R) principal series Lemma
- K-type eigenvalues of A(nu): recurrence, closed form and nonvanishing Lemma
- Matrix-coefficient formulas and decay for the discrete and principal series Lemma
- The invariant pairing between opposite principal-series parameters Lemma
- Classification of the irreducible unitary dual of SL2(R) Theorem
- Generic irreducibility and the exceptional parameter lattice Theorem
- Meromorphic continuation and intertwining identity for A(nu) Theorem
- Parameter-sign equivalence and its exceptional failures for SL2(R) Theorem
- The limits of discrete series are not square-integrable Theorem
- Unitarity and irreducibility of the limits of discrete series Theorem
- Unitarity of the complementary series Theorem
- Unitarity of the unitary principal series Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
118 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emmanuel Kowalski, An Introduction to the Representation Theory of Groups (AMS GSM 155; author's PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Matt Kerr, Notes on the Representation Theory of SL2(R) (CBMS workshop writeup) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups (MIT 18.757 lecture notes, Fall 2023) (standard reference, not scraped)