Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The compact picture of the SL2(R) principal series

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let ε∈{0,1}, ν∈C, and let Iε,ν be as in The normalized principal series I(epsilon, nu). Write Cε∞(K)={f∈C∞(K):f(kθ+π)=(−1)εf(kθ)}, and define Lε2(K) by the same parity condition in L2(K,dk).

(1) Smooth compact picture. Restriction φ↦φ∣K is a linear isomorphism from the smooth covariant functions of Iε,ν onto Cε∞(K). For any factorization g=pk with p=mpatnx∈P and k∈K, its inverse is φ(g)=∣α(p)∣1+νσε(mp)f(k). The parity condition makes this independent of the M=P∩K ambiguity. The unique positive-diagonal factorization g=atnxk gives the canonical formula φ(g)=e(1+ν)t/2f(k). This isomorphism intertwines right translation with the Iwasawa-cocycle action (g0⋅f)(k)=∣α(p(k,g0))∣1+νσε(mp(k,g0))f(κ(k,g0)), where kg0=p(k,g0)κ(k,g0) is the unique AN×K factorization; in this canonical factorization p(k,g0)∈AN and mp(k,g0)=I.

(2) Unitary case. If ν∈iR, the inducing character σεeν is unitary. Restriction carries the normalized induced inner product to ⟨f,h⟩=∫Kf(k)h(k)‾ dk on Lε2(K). The resulting representation is strongly continuous and unitary, and is equivalent to the right-covariant model of Ind⁡PG(σε⊗eν) in Unitary induction from a closed subgroup. Under inversion and the rho half-density, the parameter remains ν in that unitary model.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, ε∈{0,1}, ν∈C, and the normalized principal series from part (1).

[F1]

The subgroups, characters, modular conventions, normalized Haar measure dk, and coordinates on K,A,N are fixed by Iwasawa and minimal-parabolic data for SL2(R).

[F2]

Multiplication gives unique smooth KAN and NAK coordinates; the Haar density in KAN coordinates is et dk dt dx, and G is unimodular (Iwasawa decomposition and Haar integration formula for SL2(R)).

[F3]

The smooth model has left P-covariance by χε,ν=δP1/2σεeν and right-translation action; σεeν is unitary for ν∈iR (The normalized principal series I(epsilon, nu)).

[F4]

The unitary induction model uses continuous right-P-covariant functions, the rho quotient norm, and its Hilbert completion (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).

[F5]

A rho-function satisfies ρ(xp)=ΔP(p)ΔG(p)−1ρ(x) (Rho-function for a closed subgroup).

[F6]

The group modular functions are continuous homomorphisms; their convention is fixed by Modular function of a locally compact group and The modular function is a continuous homomorphism.

[F7]

For closed P, G/P is locally compact Hausdorff, the quotient map is continuous, and subgroup averaging sends Cc(G) to Cc(G/P) (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F9]

A positive functional on Cc(G/P;R) is integration against a Radon measure (Positive functionals on C_c(X) are integration against a Radon measure).

[F10]

For fixed left Haar measures and a rho-function, the Weil formula gives a unique Radon quotient measure (Weil formula with a rho-function).

[F11]

If the inducing character is unitary, the completed covariant model with its cocycle action is a strongly continuous unitary representation (Unitary induction from a closed subgroup).

[F12]

The quotient Radon–Nikodym cocycle is Dg(xP)=ρ(g−1x)/ρ(x), and its square root corrects the left action (Continuous quotient translation cocycle).

[F13]

Trigonometric polynomials are finite linear combinations of the circle characters (Fourier coefficients and trigonometric polynomials on the torus).

[F14]

Trigonometric polynomials are uniformly dense in continuous functions on the circle (Trigonometric polynomials are uniformly dense in continuous functions on the torus).

[F15]

Continuous functions are dense in L2 on the finite torus with normalized Haar measure (Continuous functions are dense in Lp of finite tori and of bounded intervals).

[F16]

Normalized Haar measure on a compact Lie group is right-translation and inversion invariant (Normalized Haar measure on a compact Lie group).

[F17]

A left Haar measure is a nonzero left-invariant Borel Radon measure finite on compact sets, and Lebesgue measure on R2 is Radon under ACω (Left Haar integral and left Haar measure, Lebesgue measure is a Radon measure on R^n).

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice supplies the normalized Haar measure and is assumed by the Weil, cocycle, and unitary-induction suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]

AC implies the countable-choice hypothesis used by the Fourier-density suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2algebra

By [F2], write each g∈G uniquely as g=nxatk. Since nxat=atne−tx, this is also the unique smooth factorization g=atne−txk with atne−tx∈AN. Thus restriction to K is injective on the induced function model, because covariance determines φ on every g=pk.

1.2A1F1F2F5F6F7F8F9F10F16F17A2algebra

By [F2], write uniquely g=katnx and set ρ(g)=e−t. For p0=masny, direct multiplication using centrality of M gives gp0=km at+sne−sx+y; hence ρ(gp0)=e−sρ(g)=ΔP(p0)ΔG(p0)−1ρ(g) by [F1], [F2], and [F6]. Thus ρ is a positive continuous rho-function by [F5], and ρ(k)=1 for k∈K. The continuous map q:K→G/P, q(k)=kP, is onto because G=KAN; therefore G/P is compact by [F7] and [F8]. Define Λ(ψ)=∫Kψ(kP) dk on Cc(G/P;R). This is positive and Λ(1)=1, so [F9] represents it by a Radon probability dkˉ, the pushforward of dk. Give P=M×AN left Haar measure dp by normalized counting on M and dt dx on AN; left multiplication by asny sends (t,x) to (s+t,x+e−ty) with Jacobian 1, and M is central. The Radon property follows from [F17] and finite disjoint union over M. For h∈Cc(G), subgroup averaging [F7] makes kP↦∫Ph(kp)ρ(kp)−1 dp a member of Cc(G/P). The Weil formula [F10], applied to h/ρ, gives ∫Gh(g) dg=∫G/P∫Ph(kp)ρ(kp)−1 dp dμρ(kP). With dkˉ instead, the right side is ∫K12∑m∈M∫R2h(kmasny)es dy ds dk=∫K∫R2h(kasny)es dy ds dk, since dk is right-M-invariant by [F16]. This is the KAN Haar integral [F2], so uniqueness in [F10] gives dkˉ=μρ.

1.3F13F14F15F16A2algebra

Identify K with the circle by kθ↔[θ/(2π)]. On continuous functions the projection Pεf(k)=12(f(k)+(−1)εf(−k)) has norm at most 1 and range Cε(K). By [F14], trigonometric polynomials approximate each continuous function uniformly; applying Pε gives parity trigonometric polynomials approximating each continuous parity function uniformly. By [F15], continuous functions are dense in L2(K); applying the same bounded projection, which is an L2 contraction by [F16], shows continuous parity functions are dense in Lε2(K). Therefore parity trigonometric polynomials, which are K-finite by [F13], are dense in Lε2(K).

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

If φ∈Iε,ν, its M-covariance gives f(−k)=(−1)εf(k) for f=φ∣K. Conversely, for f∈Cε∞(K) define φ(atnxk)=e(1+ν)t/2f(k) in the unique ANK coordinates. Left multiplication by asny changes t to s+t and the K factor remains fixed; left multiplication by m∈M replaces k by mk and multiplies f by σε(m). Thus φ(pg)=χε,ν(p)φ(g) and φ is smooth. For any factorization g=pk with p=matnx, centrality of m gives the same canonical factorization g=atnx(mk), so e(1+ν)t/2σε(m)f(k)=e(1+ν)t/2f(mk); this proves the inverse formula and shows its independence of the M-ambiguity.

2.2F1F3F4F5F6F12step 1.2algebra

For ν∈iR, define Uφ(x)=ρ(x)−1/2φ(x−1). By [F5] and [F6], ρ(xp)−1/2=ΔP(p)−1/2ρ(x)−1/2, since ΔG=1. Also χε,ν=δP1/2τν=ΔP−1/2τν, so φ(p−1x−1)=χε,ν(p)−1φ(x−1) cancels the modular factor and gives Uφ(xp)=τν(p)−1Uφ(x). The resulting continuous section has compact quotient support because G/P is compact by step 1.2. For g0∈G, direct substitution yields U(Πν(g0)φ)(x)=(ρ(g0−1x)ρ(x))1/2Uφ(g0−1x)=Dg0(xP)1/2Uφ(g0−1x) by [F12]. Hence U intertwines right translation on the left-covariant model with the cocycle-corrected left action on the right-P-covariant model of Ind⁡PG(τν); the parameter remains ν.

2.3F3F4F10F16step 1.2algebra

The quotient norm of Uφ is, by [F10] and step 1.2, ∥Uφ∥2=∫G/P∣Uφ(x)∣2 dμρ(xP)=∫K∣Uφ(k)∣2 dk=∫K∣φ(k−1)∣2 dk. Inversion invariance of normalized Haar measure [F16] makes this ∫K∣f(k)∣2 dk, so restriction is isometric for the normalized induced inner product.

3.1F1F2F3step 2.1algebra

For g0∈G, factor kg0=at(k,g0)nx(k,g0)κ(k,g0) by the canonical ANK coordinates. Then (Πν(g0)φ)(k)=φ(kg0)=e(1+ν)t(k,g0)/2f(κ(k,g0)). In a general PK factorization the same value is ∣α(p)∣1+νσε(mp)f(κ); the parity relation makes this independent of the M-choice. Since −I is central, replacing k by −k leaves t,x fixed and replaces κ by −κ, so the formula preserves the parity-ε subspace. This is the stated Iwasawa-cocycle action, with mp=I in the canonical ANK coordinates.

4.1A1F3F4F11step 1.3step 2.2step 2.3algebra∎

The coordinate construction in step 2.1, together with the inverse of U from step 2.2, identifies continuous right-P-covariant sections with continuous parity-ε functions on K. Step 2.3 identifies their quotient norm with the L2(K) norm, and step 1.3 shows the smooth parity functions are dense in Lε2(K); thus the compact-picture isometry extends onto the completed induced Hilbert space. By [F11], Ind⁡PG(τν) is strongly continuous and unitary because τν is a continuous unitary character for ν∈iR. The intertwining identity in step 2.2 transfers these properties to the compact-picture action.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

118 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources