Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)

Statement

Assume AC. If H is closed in a locally compact Hausdorff group G, then X=G/H is locally compact Hausdorff and the quotient map p:G→X is open. Every compact Q⊆X lies in p(K) for some compact K⊆G. For fixed left Haar measure dh on H, THf(xH)=∫Hf(xh) dh maps Cc(G) onto Cc(X).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The LCH group G, its closed subgroup H, and AC.

[F1]

AC implies DC, and under DC a compact set inside an open LCH set admits a Cc cutoff (AC implies DC implies countable choice, LCH Urysohn cutoff).

[F2]

For compactly supported continuous kernels on two LCH spaces, the two positive Radon integrations commute and the partial integrals are continuous with compact support (Compactly supported kernels admit commuting radon integrals).

[A1]

AC is the choice-function principle (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenconstruct

The quotient map is open because p−1(p(O))=OH is open whenever O⊆G is open. To separate distinct cosets xH,yH, note y−1x∉H. Closedness gives an open neighborhood W of y−1x disjoint from H. Continuity of (v,u)↦v−1y−1xu gives identity neighborhoods V,U with V−1y−1xU⊆W; hence p(xU) and p(yV) are disjoint. Thus X is Hausdorff. If U is a relatively compact open neighborhood of x, then p(U) is open and its closure lies in the compact, hence closed, set p(U‾), so X is locally compact.

2.1step 1.1choose

For compact Q⊆X, cover Q by sets p(Uq) where each Uq is relatively compact and open. A finite subcover exists, and the union K of the corresponding finitely many compact closures satisfies Q⊆p(K).

2.2F2step 1.1construct

For each f∈Cc(G), the function x↦∫Hf(xh) dh is continuous locally on G: around any x0 choose a compact neighborhood K; the kernel (x,h)↦f(xh) on K×H is supported in the compact set {(x,h)∈K×H:xh∈supp⁡f}, so [F2] gives continuity there. Left invariance of dh makes this function right H-invariant, and openness of p makes its descended function THf continuous. Its support lies in the compact set p(supp⁡f), so THf∈Cc(X).

3.1A1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2chooseconstruct

Let ϕ∈Cc(X) and Q=supp⁡ϕ. By [A1], choose a lift xq of each q∈Q. For each lift apply [F1] to the singleton and a relatively compact open neighborhood to obtain a nonnegative uq∈Cc(G) with uq(xq)=1. A nonzero left Haar measure has full support: its support is a nonempty closed set invariant under every left translation, hence is all of H. Thus uq(xq⋅) has positive integral on H, so THuq(q)>0. By continuity from step 2.2, THuq stays positive on a neighborhood of q. A finite subcover of Q gives u=∑iuqi with THu>0 on an open neighborhood W of Q. The function ψ=ϕ/(THu) on W, extended by zero, is in Cc(X) because its support is contained in the compact set Q⊂W. Set f=(ψ∘p)u. Then f∈Cc(G) and THf=ψTHu=ϕ, also when ϕ=0 (use f=0). Thus TH:Cc(G)→Cc(X) is onto; compact lifts were proved in step 2.1. ∎

Sources

  • Bekka, de la Harpe, and Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, Lemma B.1.1 (compact lifts) and Lemma B.1.2 (surjectivity of subgroup averaging), PDF pp. 349–352. Full relevant text was inspected; this proof supplies the local quotient-topology and compact-kernel details.
  • Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapter 7 §3.3, Proposition 2, PDF pp. 72–74. Bruhat writes the opposite coset convention; the displayed formulas here use left cosets G/H and f(xh).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources