How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)
Statement
Assume AC. If is closed in a locally compact Hausdorff group , then is locally compact Hausdorff and the quotient map is open. Every compact lies in for some compact . For fixed left Haar measure on , maps onto .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The LCH group , its closed subgroup , and AC.
AC implies DC, and under DC a compact set inside an open LCH set admits a cutoff (AC implies DC implies countable choice, LCH Urysohn cutoff).
For compactly supported continuous kernels on two LCH spaces, the two positive Radon integrations commute and the partial integrals are continuous with compact support (Compactly supported kernels admit commuting radon integrals).
AC is the choice-function principle (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
The quotient map is open because is open whenever is open. To separate distinct cosets , note . Closedness gives an open neighborhood of disjoint from . Continuity of gives identity neighborhoods with ; hence and are disjoint. Thus is Hausdorff. If is a relatively compact open neighborhood of , then is open and its closure lies in the compact, hence closed, set , so is locally compact.
For compact , cover by sets where each is relatively compact and open. A finite subcover exists, and the union of the corresponding finitely many compact closures satisfies .
For each , the function is continuous locally on : around any choose a compact neighborhood ; the kernel on is supported in the compact set , so [F2] gives continuity there. Left invariance of makes this function right -invariant, and openness of makes its descended function continuous. Its support lies in the compact set , so .
Let and . By [A1], choose a lift of each . For each lift apply [F1] to the singleton and a relatively compact open neighborhood to obtain a nonnegative with . A nonzero left Haar measure has full support: its support is a nonempty closed set invariant under every left translation, hence is all of . Thus has positive integral on , so . By continuity from step 2.2, stays positive on a neighborhood of . A finite subcover of gives with on an open neighborhood of . The function on , extended by zero, is in because its support is contained in the compact set . Set . Then and , also when (use ). Thus is onto; compact lifts were proved in step 2.1. ∎
Sources
- Bekka, de la Harpe, and Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, Lemma B.1.1 (compact lifts) and Lemma B.1.2 (surjectivity of subgroup averaging), PDF pp. 349–352. Full relevant text was inspected; this proof supplies the local quotient-topology and compact-kernel details.
- Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapter 7 §3.3, Proposition 2, PDF pp. 72–74. Bruhat writes the opposite coset convention; the displayed formulas here use left cosets and .
Depends on
Used by
- Bruhat cutoff normalized along H-fibers Lemma
- Composition of Weil quotient integrals Lemma
- Continuous quotient translation cocycle Lemma
- Density of averaged covariant generators Lemma
- Local densities for equivalent Radon quotient measures Lemma
- Strong continuity of unitary induction Lemma
- Well-defined induced inner product Lemma
- Criterion for an invariant quotient measure Proposition
- Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes Theorem
- Independence of rho and equivalent quotient representative Theorem
- Induction in stages for closed subgroup chains Theorem
- Weil formula with a rho-function Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendices B and E (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapters 1 and 7 (standard reference, not scraped)