Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strong continuity of unitary induction

Statement

Assume AC. The induced unitary action Πρ is strongly continuous: ∥Πρ(g)F−F∥2→0 as g→e for every vector in the induced Hilbert space.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the induced representation constructed from H≤G, σ, ρ, and μρ.

[F1]

Each Πρ(g) is unitary (Unitary cocycle-corrected left action).

[F2]

Continuous compact-quotient-support sections are dense in the induced Hilbert space (Density of averaged covariant generators).

[F3]

Compact quotient sets have compact lifts, the quotient is LCH, and its Radon measure is finite on compact sets (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H), Weil formula with a rho-function).

[A1]

AC is assumed for the density and compact-lift construction (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2F3choose

Fix F∈Cc(G,H;V) and let K be its compact quotient support. Choose a compact identity neighborhood C⊂G and put Q=K∪CK, a compact subset of G/H. For g∈C both F and Πρ(g)F vanish off Q.

2.1A1F1F3step 1.1

Choose a compact lift K0⊂G of Q using [F3] and [A1]. On C×K0, joint continuity of (g,x)↦Dg(xH)1/2F(g−1x) and compactness imply uniform convergence to F(x) as g→e. The fiber norm of the difference is right-H invariant, so this gives uniform convergence on Q. Since μρ(Q)<∞, its L2 norm is at most μρ(Q)1/2 times that uniform bound, and tends to zero.

3.1A1F1F2step 2.1choose

For arbitrary u in the completion and ϵ>0, choose F∈Cc(G,H;V) with ∥u−F∥2<ϵ by [F2]. Unitarity gives ∥Πρ(g)u−u∥2≤2ϵ+∥Πρ(g)F−F∥2. Step 2.1 makes the last term tend to zero; then let ϵ↓0. This proves strong continuity for every vector. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Proposition E.1.4, PDF pp. 413–414. Full relevant proof was inspected.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources