How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Induced Unitary Representations of Locally Compact Groups
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Banach Valued Integration and the Radon Nikodym Property
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Haar Measure Existence and Uniqueness
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Modular Function and L1 Group Algebras
- The Radon Nikodym Theorem and Lebesgue Decomposition
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Uniform Spaces: the Three Definitions
- Unitary Representations, Positive Type and GNS
- Urysohn's Lemma and the Tietze Extension Theorem
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
Let be a locally compact Hausdorff group and a closed subgroup. This page constructs unitary induction from quotient integration through the resulting strongly continuous representation. It treats arbitrary locally compact groups; no global sigma-compactness assumption is imposed.
The convention throughout is For the left action on , the pushforward is , so a rho-derived Weil measure has density These formulas fix the reciprocal choices that otherwise vary across references.
The construction begins with the open quotient map , compact lifts and subgroup averaging. A normalized Bruhat cutoff supports the quotient integration formula. The rho-function existence proof then gives a full-support, strongly quasi-invariant Radon measure. Invariant quotient measure is a separate question: it exists exactly when .
For a strongly continuous unitary representation of , the induced space starts from continuous functions satisfying , with compact support modulo . The quotient inner product is independent of the representative. Averaged compactly supported vectors are dense, and the cocycle-corrected left action is unitary and strongly continuous. Its completion is the induced representation.
Equivalent rho-functions give the multiplier unitary . Equivalent quasi-invariant Radon representatives are handled by positive Radon–Nikodym densities on open sigma-compact components and the corresponding translated cocycles; the componentwise unitaries assemble on the Hilbert direct sum. The local density argument does not assert a global density on a non-sigma-finite quotient.
For a closed chain , three compatible Weil measures yield an explicit quotient-integral composition formula. The induction-in-stages proof uses its positive density to define the comparison map, checks its norm and intertwining identities, and proves dense-range surjectivity on compactly supported covariant generators. The source’s published stages argument is a sketch; the item proof supplies these steps.
Choice assumptions are stated where used. In particular, the quotient-density cocycle, the representative-independent induced inner product, and the cocycle-corrected unitary action explicitly assume AC because their current proof route uses AC-qualified quotient-lift and Weil-measure suppliers, together with Radon-measure uniqueness under DC (derived from AC here); no choice-free replacement has been established for these routes. The downstream induction and continuity claims already carry the same assumption. The examples page records the regular representation, a cocompact discrete subgroup, the finite counting model, and a quotient with no invariant measure.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)
Statement
Assume AC. If is closed in a locally compact Hausdorff group , then is locally compact Hausdorff and the quotient map is open. Every compact lies in for some compact . For fixed left Haar measure on , maps onto .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The LCH group , its closed subgroup , and AC.
AC implies DC, and under DC a compact set inside an open LCH set admits a cutoff (AC implies DC implies countable choice, LCH Urysohn cutoff).
For compactly supported continuous kernels on two LCH spaces, the two positive Radon integrations commute and the partial integrals are continuous with compact support (Compactly supported kernels admit commuting radon integrals).
AC is the choice-function principle (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
The quotient map is open because is open whenever is open. To separate distinct cosets , note . Closedness gives an open neighborhood of disjoint from . Continuity of gives identity neighborhoods with ; hence and are disjoint. Thus is Hausdorff. If is a relatively compact open neighborhood of , then is open and its closure lies in the compact, hence closed, set , so is locally compact.
For compact , cover by sets where each is relatively compact and open. A finite subcover exists, and the union of the corresponding finitely many compact closures satisfies .
For each , the function is continuous locally on : around any choose a compact neighborhood ; the kernel on is supported in the compact set , so [F2] gives continuity there. Left invariance of makes this function right -invariant, and openness of makes its descended function continuous. Its support lies in the compact set , so .
Let and . By [A1], choose a lift of each . For each lift apply [F1] to the singleton and a relatively compact open neighborhood to obtain a nonnegative with . A nonzero left Haar measure has full support: its support is a nonempty closed set invariant under every left translation, hence is all of . Thus has positive integral on , so . By continuity from step 2.2, stays positive on a neighborhood of . A finite subcover of gives with on an open neighborhood of . The function on , extended by zero, is in because its support is contained in the compact set . Set . Then and , also when (use ). Thus is onto; compact lifts were proved in step 2.1. ∎
Sources
- Bekka, de la Harpe, and Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, Lemma B.1.1 (compact lifts) and Lemma B.1.2 (surjectivity of subgroup averaging), PDF pp. 349–352. Full relevant text was inspected; this proof supplies the local quotient-topology and compact-kernel details.
- Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapter 7 §3.3, Proposition 2, PDF pp. 72–74. Bruhat writes the opposite coset convention; the displayed formulas here use left cosets and .
Quasi-invariant Radon measure on G/H
Definition
Let be a locally compact Hausdorff group and a closed subgroup. Write and let for the pushforward under the left action. A nonzero Radon measure on is quasi-invariant if and are equivalent for every , meaning they have the same null Borel sets. A representative is strongly quasi-invariant when the Radon–Nikodym densities can be chosen jointly continuous and positive as a function of .
The first condition depends only on the measure class. The stronger condition names a regular representative and a continuous density cocycle; it is the version constructed from a rho-function below.
Rho-function for a closed subgroup
Definition
Fix left Haar measures on a locally compact Hausdorff group and its closed subgroup . Use the convention for right translation by . A rho-function for is a positive continuous function satisfying
The ratio is fixed by the left-Haar and right- averaging conventions used in the Weil formula. In particular, a later ratio such as is constant on each right -fiber.
Bruhat cutoff normalized along H-fibers
Statement
Assume AC. For closed there is a continuous with for every , and for every compact the part of lying over is compact. In particular, each -fiber meets in a compact set.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A locally compact Hausdorff group , a closed subgroup , fixed left Haar measure on , and AC.
AC implies DC and countable choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice).
is LCH, the quotient map is open, compact quotient sets have compact lifts, and is onto (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
Every regular Lindelöf space is paracompact under countable choice (Under countable choice, every regular Lindelöf space is paracompact).
A paracompact Hausdorff space has a locally finite partition of unity subordinate to any open cover under AC and DC (Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space admits a locally finite subordinate partition of unity).
Compact sets inside open subsets of an LCH space admit compactly supported continuous cutoffs under DC (LCH Urysohn cutoff).
AC means every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Choose a relatively compact symmetric open identity neighborhood in and let . Then is an open subgroup and is -compact, since . Its orbits on are open and disjoint; each is a continuous image of , hence -compact. As an open subspace of the LCH space , each orbit is regular and Lindelöf. By [F1] and [F3], every orbit is paracompact, and their topological sum is paracompact.
Cover by relatively compact open sets. By [F4] choose a locally finite partition of unity subordinate to this cover; each is compact. Use [F5] to choose with on , and [F2] to choose a nonnegative with . Define . It is continuous, nonnegative and compactly supported, and .
Set . Since is locally finite and is continuous, the sum is locally finite on , hence continuous and nonnegative. Fiber integration gives . For compact , only finitely many meet ; the support of over is contained in the finite union of the compact sets . Thus it is compact. AC supplies the choices, and the construction applies to non--compact because it uses the open -orbits from step 1.1. ∎
Weil formula with a rho-function
Statement
Assume AC. For fixed left Haar measures and any rho-function there is a unique Radon measure on such that for every . It has full support.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: LCH , closed , fixed left Haar measures , a rho-function , and AC.
The convention is , and rho covariance is (Rho-function for a closed subgroup).
The averaging map is onto; its proof also constructs nonnegative lifts and lifts whose averages equal on a prescribed compact quotient set (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
Positive integrations against compactly supported continuous kernels on LCH spaces commute (Compactly supported kernels admit commuting radon integrals).
Every positive functional on , for LCH, is represented by a Radon measure (Positive functionals on C_c(X) are integration against a Radon measure).
Two Radon measures agreeing on agree on all Borel sets under DC (Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).
Inversion changes left Haar integration by for nonnegative Borel (Haar change of variables under inversion).
AC implies DC (AC implies DC implies countable choice).
AC is assumed in its choice-function form (The Axiom of Choice).
Any point of an open subset of an LCH space admits a nonnegative compactly supported continuous bump contained in that open set (LCH Urysohn cutoff).
Proof
For , the kernel has compact support in : its support lies in . Thus [F3] permits interchanging the two integrations. Right-translation change of variables in , [F1], and inversion in using [F6] give Explicitly, the inner integral at becomes ; integrating this in and applying [F6] gives .
Define . If , let and choose with on , as supplied by the compact-set lift construction in [F2]. The identity in step 1.1 gives . Thus is well defined. If , choose a nonnegative lift with using [F2]; then .
By [F4] and [F7], is represented by a Radon measure , and [F5] makes it unique. The defining identity for is the displayed Weil formula. For any nonempty open , [F8] gives a nonzero nonnegative supported in . Choose the nonnegative lift from [F2]. Since is nonzero, is positive at some point and hence on a nonempty open subset of . A nonzero left Haar measure has full support: its support is nonempty, closed, and invariant under every left translation, so it is all of . The positive continuous weight therefore gives . The Weil identity implies , proving full support. ∎
Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes
Statement
Assume AC. Every closed admits a rho-function and a full-support strongly quasi-invariant Radon measure on satisfying the Weil formula.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: LCH , closed , fixed left Haar measures and AC.
AC implies DC (AC implies DC implies countable choice).
There is a continuous nonnegative Bruhat cutoff with and compact support over compact quotient subsets (Bruhat cutoff normalized along H-fibers).
The modular functions are positive continuous homomorphisms and the rho covariance convention is (Rho-function for a closed subgroup, The modular function is a continuous homomorphism).
Compactly supported continuous kernels have continuous partial integrals (Compactly supported kernels admit commuting radon integrals).
Every rho-function gives a unique Radon quotient measure satisfying the Weil formula (Weil formula with a rho-function).
is onto (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
Radon measures agreeing on agree on Borel sets under DC (Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).
AC is the choice-function principle (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Define . For each , the integrand is supported on the compact fiber intersection , so its integral is finite. It is positive because , the weight is positive, and .
Near choose a compact neighborhood . The set is compact by [F2], and all for which with lie in the compact set . The integrand is jointly continuous with this common compact support; [F4] gives continuity of its integral. Thus is positive and continuous.
For , substitute ; left invariance of and the homomorphism laws give . Hence is a rho-function.
Apply [F5] to obtain and the Weil formula. The ratio is independent of the representative by [F3] and is positive continuous. For , Weil and left invariance give By [F6] this holds for every , and [F7] identifies . Positivity of gives equivalence of measures; the ratio descends continuously jointly in through the open quotient map. Thus is strongly quasi-invariant. Full support is part of [F5]. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, PDF pp. 349–356; Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapter 7 §§3.3–3.4, PDF pp. 72–77. Full relevant text was inspected.
Criterion for an invariant quotient measure
Statement
Assume AC. The quotient has a nonzero -invariant Radon measure if and only if . When they agree, in the Weil formula supplies such a measure.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: LCH , closed , fixed left Haar measures, and AC.
The averaging map is onto (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
Positive functionals on have Radon representing measures, and Radon measures are determined by their integrals (Positive functionals on C_c(X) are integration against a Radon measure, Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).
Any two left Haar measures are positive scalar multiples (Uniqueness of left Haar measure up to scale).
Right translation by scales a left Haar integral by (Right translation scales left Haar measure).
is a rho-function exactly when ; its Weil measure satisfies the quotient formula (Rho-function for a closed subgroup, Weil formula with a rho-function).
AC implies DC as required by the cited measure results (AC implies DC implies countable choice).
AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Assume is a nonzero invariant Radon measure on . Define for real . This functional is positive. If it were zero, surjectivity [F1] would make every integral against zero, and [F2] would force . Thus is nonzero.
Conversely suppose the modular functions agree on . Then satisfies the covariance in [F5]. Let be the Weil measure. For and , its translate satisfies by left invariance.
For , let . Then , so invariance of gives . By [F2], is represented by a Radon measure on ; it is left invariant and nonzero, hence a left Haar measure.
By [F3], for . For , right translation gives by [F4] applied in . Hence . Since , [F4] applied in also gives . Choose with ; equality forces .
Surjectivity [F1] gives this equality for every test function. The Radon uniqueness in [F2] shows ; the Weil measure is nonzero. This proves sufficiency and the equivalence. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, Corollary B.1.7, PDF pp. 355–356; Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapter 7 §3.3, Proposition 3, PDF pp. 74–75. Full relevant text was inspected.
Continuous quotient translation cocycle
Statement
Assume AC. For the rho-derived and , . This is independent of representative, jointly continuous, and satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Closed , a rho-function , its Weil measure , and elements .
AC is assumed as stated (The Axiom of Choice).
Rho-functions satisfy (Rho-function for a closed subgroup).
The rho-derived measure satisfies the Weil formula (Weil formula with a rho-function).
Every equals for some (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
Radon measures agreeing on agree on Borel sets (Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).
The quotient map is open and is LCH (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
AC implies DC, so the Radon-measure uniqueness supplier applies (AC implies DC implies countable choice).
Proof
Define . Replacing by multiplies numerator and denominator by the same factor from [F1], so the ratio is well-defined and positive. The continuous function is constant on fibers in the second coordinate; [F5] makes its descent through continuous.
For , Weil’s formula and left invariance give The positive continuous density is locally bounded, so it defines a Radon measure relative to the Radon measure . By [F3] the equality holds on every function; [F4] identifies . This proves the derivative formula.
For , the ratios telescope: Together with step 1.1, this proves the stated cocycle identity and continuity. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, Theorem B.1.4 and its quotient-measure density calculation, PDF pp. 352–354. Full relevant text was inspected.
Continuous covariant model and measurable completion
Statement
Assume AC. For a strongly continuous unitary , let be continuous with and compact support modulo . Equip it with and take its Hilbert completion. Every completed vector admits a locally strongly measurable covariant representative, and two such representatives define the same vector exactly when they agree -almost everywhere in quotient norm.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, closed , a strongly continuous unitary representation on a Hilbert space , and the rho-derived Radon measure .
is unitary, so it preserves norms (Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners).
The quotient is LCH and is Radon (Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes).
Monotone convergence applies to increasing nonnegative measurable functions (Monotone convergence for the integral).
AC is inherited from the quotient-measure construction (The Axiom of Choice).
Definition
A continuous is covariant if . Its norm descends to by unitarity. “Compact support modulo ” means this descended norm vanishes outside a compact quotient subset. The Hilbert space in the statement is the completion of this normed space, with inner product obtained by integrating the descended pointwise inner product.
Proof
For two covariant sections, [F1] gives . Thus their difference norm descends continuously to . Compact support modulo and Radon finiteness on compact sets make its square integrable, so the stated norm is well-defined.
Let be Cauchy in this norm. Choose a subsequence such that . The partial sums , with , satisfy by Minkowski. By [F3] and monotone convergence, is finite almost everywhere and has finite norm. Its infinite-value set is a measurable null set in . Outside its saturated preimage, the sections are pointwise Cauchy for every lift and converge to a covariant function ; set on the null fibers. On each compact neighborhood in , the continuous approximants have jointly separable range, so their pointwise limit is locally strongly measurable. The norm of the tail is bounded by the tail of the same summable series, again by Minkowski and monotone convergence. Thus the embedded classes converge to , which represents the original completion vector.
Equivalent Cauchy sequences have difference norm zero and so have representatives equal almost everywhere. Conversely, representatives equal almost everywhere have zero difference norm, hence define the same completion vector. This proves the asserted identification. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1 and Remark E.1.2, PDF pp. 411–413; Vogan, On the Definition of Induced Representations, §§1–4. Relevant portions were inspected.
Well-defined induced inner product
Statement
Assume AC. For , is independent of , continuous, and compactly supported. Its integral is a positive-definite inner product; the norm vanishes only when .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Strongly continuous unitary , rho-derived measure , and .
AC is assumed as stated (The Axiom of Choice).
Covariant sections satisfy (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).
The representation in the induced model is unitary on (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).
The quotient map is open and is LCH (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
The rho-derived Radon measure has full support (Weil formula with a rho-function).
Proof
For , covariance and unitarity give Thus the scalar is independent of the representative. Its continuous lift to descends continuously because the quotient map is open; its support lies in the intersection of the compact quotient supports.
Radon finiteness on that compact support makes the integral finite. For , the integral is nonnegative. If it were zero but were nonzero at some , continuity would make positive on a nonempty open subset of , which has positive measure by full support [F4], a contradiction. Hence the norm is positive definite; integrating the pointwise sesquilinear form gives the asserted inner product. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Definition E.1.6, PDF pp. 412–413. Full relevant text was inspected.
Density of averaged covariant generators
Statement
Assume AC. For and , the section belongs to . Their finite linear span is uniformly dense on compact quotient supports in , and the Hilbert completion equals the locally strongly measurable covariant sections modulo -almost-everywhere equality.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, closed , a strongly continuous unitary on , and the rho-derived quotient measure.
Covariant sections and their quotient norm are defined in the induced model (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).
Their integrated inner product is positive definite, and the measure has full support (Well-defined induced inner product).
The averaging map is onto with nonnegative lifts, compact quotient sets have compact lifts, and compact subsets of an open set admit compactly supported cutoffs (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H), LCH Urysohn cutoff).
A finite open cover near a compact set admits a subordinate compactly supported partition of unity under DC (A finite compactly supported partition of unity near a compact set).
is dense in for Radon measures under DC (C_c(X) is dense in L^p(mu) for a Radon measure).
Strong measurability and integrability of the norm imply Bochner integrability (Bochner integrability criterion).
AC implies DC (AC implies DC implies countable choice).
The Weil formula holds for , and Radon measures agreeing on agree on Borel sets (Weil formula with a rho-function, Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).
AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
For fixed , the integrand defining is supported on the compact set , so the Bochner integral exists. Replacing by and substituting gives . For a relatively compact neighborhood of a fixed , every contributing lies in the compact set . The integrand is jointly continuous on a compact neighborhood times , so its uniform variation in tends to zero as ; the integral therefore varies continuously. Its quotient support lies in , which is compact. Thus .
Now let be a locally strongly measurable covariant section with finite quotient norm. By [F5] choose close in scalar to ; outside the tail of is therefore small. Put and choose a cutoff with on by [F3], then choose a nonnegative lift with by [F3]. The measurable map is supported in a compact subset of . For , apply the Weil formula [F8] to . It identifies the finite Radon measures and , first on and then on Borel sets by [F8]. Integrating gives On its compact support is finite, so [F6] makes Bochner square integrable.
Let and . Choose a cutoff with on by [F3], then a nonnegative lift with by [F3]. The map is continuous and compactly supported on . Cover its compact support by finitely many open sets on which varies by less than in norm; [F4] supplies a subordinate partition . For chosen from each patch, is uniformly within of . Averaging the latter gives a finite sum of generators. The averaging error is bounded uniformly on the compact quotient support because, after choosing a compact lift of that support, all relevant lie in the fixed compact set , of finite Haar measure. Since on and both vanish off , the generators approximate uniformly.
Strong measurability approximates by finite-valued simple maps; scalar density [F5] approximates their coefficients in . Multiplying by one fixed compactly supported cutoff equal to one on makes all approximants supported in a common compact . The averaging operator is bounded on continuous maps supported in . If then and the bound is immediate. Otherwise choose a compact lift of and let . For each choose a representative . Cauchy–Schwarz gives . Integrating over and applying [F8] to yields Therefore averages of the finite-sum approximants converge to . Each average is a finite sum of the generators in step 1.1. Letting the discarded tail tend to zero proves density in the full measurable space. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Proposition E.1.1 and Lemma E.1.3, PDF pp. 411–414. Full text was inspected; the vector-valued approximation and the compact-fiber bound are supplied explicitly here.
Unitary cocycle-corrected left action
Statement
Assume AC. For and , define . This is covariant, preserves the inner product, satisfies , and extends to a unitary on the completion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The induced model, its quotient measure, and .
AC is assumed as stated (The Axiom of Choice).
is positive, representative-independent, and satisfies the density cocycle (Continuous quotient translation cocycle).
Covariant functions and their norm are defined by the induced model (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).
The integrated inner product is positive definite (Well-defined induced inner product).
Proof
Since is a function on , it is right -invariant. Thus proves covariance of . Its quotient support is the translate by of the compact support of .
Applying twice gives by the cocycle identity [F1]. Also , so is the inverse.
The cocycle identity with gives . The change-of-measure formula then yields Thus the operator is an isometry on the dense continuous model, and its inverse from step 2.1 makes its extension unitary on the completion. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Proposition E.1.4, PDF pp. 413–414. Full relevant text was inspected.
Strong continuity of unitary induction
Statement
Assume AC. The induced unitary action is strongly continuous: as for every vector in the induced Hilbert space.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and the induced representation constructed from , , , and .
Each is unitary (Unitary cocycle-corrected left action).
Continuous compact-quotient-support sections are dense in the induced Hilbert space (Density of averaged covariant generators).
Compact quotient sets have compact lifts, the quotient is LCH, and its Radon measure is finite on compact sets (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H), Weil formula with a rho-function).
AC is assumed for the density and compact-lift construction (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Fix and let be its compact quotient support. Choose a compact identity neighborhood and put , a compact subset of . For both and vanish off .
Choose a compact lift of using [F3] and [A1]. On , joint continuity of and compactness imply uniform convergence to as . The fiber norm of the difference is right- invariant, so this gives uniform convergence on . Since , its norm is at most times that uniform bound, and tends to zero.
For arbitrary in the completion and , choose with by [F2]. Unitarity gives Step 2.1 makes the last term tend to zero; then let . This proves strong continuity for every vector. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Proposition E.1.4, PDF pp. 413–414. Full relevant proof was inspected.
Unitary induction from a closed subgroup
Statement
Assume AC. For every closed and strongly continuous unitary representation on a Hilbert space , the completion of covariant compact-coset-support functions with the rho quotient norm and cocycle-corrected left action is a strongly continuous unitary -representation . If it identifies with ; if , one may normalize so the quotient measure is left Haar and identify the model with carrying , ; for this is the scalar left regular representation. If is invariant the cocycle is one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, closed , and a strongly continuous unitary of .
A rho-function and full-support strongly quasi-invariant Radon measure exist (Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes).
The covariant function model and completion are defined (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).
The integrated inner product is positive definite (Well-defined induced inner product).
The cocycle-corrected action is unitary (Unitary cocycle-corrected left action).
The action is strongly continuous (Strong continuity of unitary induction).
The density derivative and its cocycle identity are given by the homogeneous-measure cocycle lemma (Continuous quotient translation cocycle).
For , the quotient formula identifies the measure with Haar measure (Weil formula with a rho-function).
AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Choose and by [F1] under [A1]. The covariance equations make the pointwise inner product a well-defined positive form by [F2,F3]. Its completion is a Hilbert space.
The formula preserves the dense covariant model and is a unitary representation by [F4]. The strong continuity lemma [F5] extends this property to every completed vector. This gives .
If , then is a singleton and every covariant section is determined by , with . Rescale by a positive constant so the quotient point has measure one; evaluation at is then an isometry, and the action becomes . If , put and choose the constant rho-function . The Weil formula [F6] then gives , so the model completes from to . The action is , namely ; for this is the scalar left regular representation. If is invariant, then ; the continuous density is therefore one everywhere by full support, so the action has no cocycle factor. These are the three stated reductions. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Definition E.1.6 and Remark E.1.7, PDF pp. 412–414; Vogan, On the Definition of Induced Representations, §§1–4. Complete relevant text was inspected.
Local densities for equivalent Radon quotient measures
Statement
Assume AC. If and are equivalent Radon measures on , then on each open -compact component of a disjoint cover of there is an almost-everywhere unique finite positive Radon–Nikodym density with . These densities define a unitary multiplication map between the completed locally measurable section spaces, component by component; no global Borel density is asserted on a non--finite quotient.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: LCH , closed , equivalent Radon measures on , and AC.
AC supplies dependent and countable choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice).
The quotient is LCH (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
The open-subgroup-orbit decomposition of has open -compact components (the construction is given in the proof below).
On a -finite measure space, absolute continuity gives a measurable Radon–Nikodym density, unique almost everywhere; equivalent measures give a density positive and finite almost everywhere (A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density).
AC permits selecting a density representative on each component (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Choose a relatively compact symmetric open identity neighborhood and set . Then is open and -compact. Its action on partitions into disjoint open orbits: the orbit through is the image of under , so it is -compact; it is LCH by [F2]. The compact closures of the sets give each orbit a countable compact cover.
Restrict and to one orbit. Each restriction is -finite because it is Radon and the orbit is a countable union of compact sets of finite measure. Equivalence gives and ; [F4] supplies a measurable with , where almost everywhere. The RN uniqueness clause makes unique up to -null sets.
By [A1] choose one measurable version separately on each orbit; all density operations below are performed componentwise. On each component, multiplication by maps isometrically onto , since ; its inverse is multiplication by . Taking the Hilbert direct sum of these componentwise unitaries gives the asserted map on the completed locally measurable section spaces.
Independence of rho and equivalent quotient representative
Statement
Assume AC. Two rho-functions with their Weil measures give unitarily equivalent induced representations by . More generally, an equivalent quasi-invariant Radon representative gives the same completed measurable-section representation via its positive local density and translated Radon–Nikodym cocycle.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the induced model and action, two rho-functions and Weil measures, or an equivalent quasi-invariant Radon measure .
The Weil formula and uniqueness identify each quotient measure (Weil formula with a rho-function).
Covariant sections use the quotient norm and cocycle action (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion, Unitary cocycle-corrected left action).
Equivalent Radon measures have positive finite local densities and componentwise unitary multiplication maps (Local densities for equivalent Radon quotient measures).
The rho-derived density is (Continuous quotient translation cocycle).
The quotient averaging map is onto (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
Radon measures agreeing on agree on Borel sets (Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).
AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Put for . The rho covariance makes this ratio independent of representative and positive continuous. If , the two Weil formulas give The measure is Radon because is positive continuous and bounded on compact sets. Surjectivity of gives equality of its integrals with those of , and [F6] identifies .
Define . The ratio is -invariant, so covariance is preserved, and step 1.1 gives The inverse multiplier is , hence extends onto the Hilbert completions.
For the action, both sides of multiply by the same scalar: which follows by substituting into [F4]. Thus the rho choices give equivalent representations.
For an equivalent quasi-invariant , [F3] supplies local densities on each open sigma-compact component. Multiplication by is a unitary from the section space to the section space, since . On each open -compact target component, maps it to an open -compact set meeting only countably many components, so the componentwise densities are measurable there. Pushing forward under gives the local Radon--Nikodym derivative almost everywhere on that component. The componentwise multiplication maps assemble on the Hilbert direct sum, and substitution in the action formula gives almost everywhere. Thus the general measure representative gives the same unitary representation. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1 Theorem B.1.4(iii) and Appendix E §E.1 Proposition E.1.5, PDF pp. 353–355 and 414–415. Full relevant text was inspected; local density handling is expanded here for non--finite quotients.
Composition of Weil quotient integrals
Statement
Assume AC. For closed and rho-functions with their Weil measures, define Then is positive continuous on , and for , The inner integral is independent of the chosen representative .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, closed , fixed compatible left Haar measures, rho-functions and Weil measures.
The rho covariance law for each subgroup pair (Rho-function for a closed subgroup).
The Weil formula for , , and (Weil formula with a rho-function).
is onto (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
Compactly supported continuous kernels have continuous compactly supported partial integrals, and the associated positive Radon integrations commute (Compactly supported kernels admit commuting radon integrals).
AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Under , the numerator of is multiplied by ; the two denominator factors multiply together by the same amount. Thus . Its positive continuous lift on therefore descends continuously to .
Fix and put for . The support in is compact. By [F1], this function is constant under right in its rho ratio, and . The Weil formula gives All integrals are finite by compact support.
The final expression in step 1.2 is unchanged when is replaced by for : substitute and use left invariance of Haar measure on . Hence it descends to a function of .
Integrate step 1.2 over . Set . The inner expression in step 1.2 is ; local compact support and [F4] make this a continuous compactly supported quotient function. Applying the Weil formula to shows that the iterated integral is . Applying the Weil formula to gives the same value as . Thus the asserted identity holds for ; surjectivity [F3] proves it for every test function. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.2, proof route preceding Theorem E.2.4, PDF pp. 416–419. The source’s induction-in-stages argument is a sketch; this quotient-integral composition is written out here.
Induction in stages for closed subgroup chains
Statement
Assume AC. If are closed locally compact subgroups and is a strongly continuous unitary -representation, then is canonically unitarily equivalent, after the selected rho and measure identifications, to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, closed , strongly continuous unitary of , and compatible rho-functions and quotient measures.
The quotient integration composition formula with density (Composition of Weil quotient integrals).
Induced Hilbert spaces have dense compactly supported covariant generators (Density of averaged covariant generators).
The induced group actions are unitary (Unitary cocycle-corrected left action).
Compact quotient sets have compact lifts and compact-kernel integrals are continuous (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H), Compactly supported kernels admit commuting radon integrals).
AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Write and, for , define using the continuous covariant representative on for the inner section. Since is right- invariant and , this is an -covariant inner section. For , the identity and the induced action formula show . Its outer support is contained in the image in of the compact support of in . To check continuity in the inner norm near , choose a compact neighborhood of and a compact lift of the quotient support of . If and , then for some ; hence and . The image in of the closed subset is a fixed compact set containing all these inner supports. Lift that compact set to a compact subset of . On this lift, continuity of the rho ratios and of gives uniform convergence as ; its quotient measure is finite, so the inner norm also converges. Thus belongs to the continuous outer model.
Apply [F1] to the continuous compactly supported scalar function . It gives Hence extends to an isometry. The rho ratios also give : after expanding both sides, the only required cancellation is , which is exactly the rho covariance under .
By [F2], outer generators with and have dense span. For fixed , this generator depends continuously on : choose a compact lift of ; then , and its quotient support lies in the compact set . Since that set has finite measure, replacing by a dense inner compactly supported covariant section approximates in the outer norm. It therefore suffices to treat such . The resulting has a continuous covariant representative , so evaluation at each is defined. Outer covariance gives Set . From the definition of , so the displayed covariance identity gives for all . For , inner covariance gives , and the same identities imply . The function is continuous: on a compact neighborhood of , the -integral defining is supported in a fixed compact subset of , and its integrand is jointly continuous, so [F4] applies. Its support modulo is compact: nonzero values require and , hence lie in the image of a product of compact lifts of these supports. Thus and . The dense outer generators lie in the range, so the closed isometric range is the whole target. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.2, Theorem E.2.4, PDF pp. 416–419. The published proof is explicitly a sketch; this proof records the norm identity and dense-range argument.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.