Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 15 results · all verified · 13 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Induced Unitary Representations of Locally Compact Groups

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Let G be a locally compact Hausdorff group and H≤G a closed subgroup. This page constructs unitary induction from quotient integration through the resulting strongly continuous representation. It treats arbitrary locally compact groups; no global sigma-compactness assumption is imposed.

The convention throughout is ∫Gf(xh) dx=ΔG(h)−1∫Gf(x) dx,ρ(xh)=ΔH(h)ΔG(h)−1ρ(x). For the left action on G/H, the pushforward is g∗μ(E)=μ(g−1E), so a rho-derived Weil measure has density d(g∗μρ)dμρ(xH)=ρ(g−1x)ρ(x). These formulas fix the reciprocal choices that otherwise vary across references.

The construction begins with the open quotient map G→G/H, compact lifts and subgroup averaging. A normalized Bruhat cutoff supports the quotient integration formula. The rho-function existence proof then gives a full-support, strongly quasi-invariant Radon measure. Invariant quotient measure is a separate question: it exists exactly when ΔG∣H=ΔH.

For a strongly continuous unitary representation σ of H, the induced space starts from continuous functions F:G→V satisfying F(xh)=σ(h)−1F(x), with compact support modulo H. The quotient inner product is independent of the representative. Averaged compactly supported vectors are dense, and the cocycle-corrected left action is unitary and strongly continuous. Its completion is the induced representation.

Equivalent rho-functions give the multiplier unitary F↦(ρ1/ρ2)1/2F. Equivalent quasi-invariant Radon representatives are handled by positive Radon–Nikodym densities on open sigma-compact components and the corresponding translated cocycles; the componentwise unitaries assemble on the Hilbert direct sum. The local density argument does not assert a global density on a non-sigma-finite quotient.

For a closed chain L≤H≤G, three compatible Weil measures yield an explicit quotient-integral composition formula. The induction-in-stages proof uses its positive density to define the comparison map, checks its norm and intertwining identities, and proves dense-range surjectivity on compactly supported covariant generators. The source’s published stages argument is a sketch; the item proof supplies these steps.

Choice assumptions are stated where used. In particular, the quotient-density cocycle, the representative-independent induced inner product, and the cocycle-corrected unitary action explicitly assume AC because their current proof route uses AC-qualified quotient-lift and Weil-measure suppliers, together with Radon-measure uniqueness under DC (derived from AC here); no choice-free replacement has been established for these routes. The downstream induction and continuity claims already carry the same assumption. The examples page records the regular representation, a cocompact discrete subgroup, the finite counting model, and a quotient with no invariant measure.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)

Statement

Assume AC. If H is closed in a locally compact Hausdorff group G, then X=G/H is locally compact Hausdorff and the quotient map p:G→X is open. Every compact Q⊆X lies in p(K) for some compact K⊆G. For fixed left Haar measure dh on H, THf(xH)=∫Hf(xh) dh maps Cc(G) onto Cc(X).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The LCH group G, its closed subgroup H, and AC.

[F1]

AC implies DC, and under DC a compact set inside an open LCH set admits a Cc cutoff (AC implies DC implies countable choice, LCH Urysohn cutoff).

[F2]

For compactly supported continuous kernels on two LCH spaces, the two positive Radon integrations commute and the partial integrals are continuous with compact support (Compactly supported kernels admit commuting radon integrals).

[A1]

AC is the choice-function principle (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenconstruct

The quotient map is open because p−1(p(O))=OH is open whenever O⊆G is open. To separate distinct cosets xH,yH, note y−1x∉H. Closedness gives an open neighborhood W of y−1x disjoint from H. Continuity of (v,u)↦v−1y−1xu gives identity neighborhoods V,U with V−1y−1xU⊆W; hence p(xU) and p(yV) are disjoint. Thus X is Hausdorff. If U is a relatively compact open neighborhood of x, then p(U) is open and its closure lies in the compact, hence closed, set p(U‾), so X is locally compact.

2.1step 1.1choose

For compact Q⊆X, cover Q by sets p(Uq) where each Uq is relatively compact and open. A finite subcover exists, and the union K of the corresponding finitely many compact closures satisfies Q⊆p(K).

2.2F2step 1.1construct

For each f∈Cc(G), the function x↦∫Hf(xh) dh is continuous locally on G: around any x0 choose a compact neighborhood K; the kernel (x,h)↦f(xh) on K×H is supported in the compact set {(x,h)∈K×H:xh∈supp⁡f}, so [F2] gives continuity there. Left invariance of dh makes this function right H-invariant, and openness of p makes its descended function THf continuous. Its support lies in the compact set p(supp⁡f), so THf∈Cc(X).

3.1A1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2chooseconstruct

Let ϕ∈Cc(X) and Q=supp⁡ϕ. By [A1], choose a lift xq of each q∈Q. For each lift apply [F1] to the singleton and a relatively compact open neighborhood to obtain a nonnegative uq∈Cc(G) with uq(xq)=1. A nonzero left Haar measure has full support: its support is a nonempty closed set invariant under every left translation, hence is all of H. Thus uq(xq⋅) has positive integral on H, so THuq(q)>0. By continuity from step 2.2, THuq stays positive on a neighborhood of q. A finite subcover of Q gives u=∑iuqi with THu>0 on an open neighborhood W of Q. The function ψ=ϕ/(THu) on W, extended by zero, is in Cc(X) because its support is contained in the compact set Q⊂W. Set f=(ψ∘p)u. Then f∈Cc(G) and THf=ψTHu=ϕ, also when ϕ=0 (use f=0). Thus TH:Cc(G)→Cc(X) is onto; compact lifts were proved in step 2.1. ∎

Sources

  • Bekka, de la Harpe, and Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, Lemma B.1.1 (compact lifts) and Lemma B.1.2 (surjectivity of subgroup averaging), PDF pp. 349–352. Full relevant text was inspected; this proof supplies the local quotient-topology and compact-kernel details.
  • Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapter 7 §3.3, Proposition 2, PDF pp. 72–74. Bruhat writes the opposite coset convention; the displayed formulas here use left cosets G/H and f(xh).
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Quasi-invariant Radon measure on G/H

Definition

Let G be a locally compact Hausdorff group and H≤G a closed subgroup. Write X=G/H and let g∗μ(E)=μ(g−1E) for the pushforward under the left action. A nonzero Radon measure μ on X is quasi-invariant if g∗μ and μ are equivalent for every g∈G, meaning they have the same null Borel sets. A representative is strongly quasi-invariant when the Radon–Nikodym densities d(g∗μ)/dμ can be chosen jointly continuous and positive as a function of (g,xH).

The first condition depends only on the measure class. The stronger condition names a regular representative and a continuous density cocycle; it is the version constructed from a rho-function below.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Rho-function for a closed subgroup

Definition

Fix left Haar measures on a locally compact Hausdorff group G and its closed subgroup H. Use the convention ∫Gf(xh) dx=ΔG(h)−1∫Gf(x) dx for right translation by h∈H. A rho-function for (G,H) is a positive continuous function ρ:G→(0,∞) satisfying

ρ(xh)=ΔH(h)ΔG(h)−1ρ(x)(x∈G, h∈H).

The ratio is fixed by the left-Haar and right-H averaging conventions used in the Weil formula. In particular, a later ratio such as ρ(g−1x)/ρ(x) is constant on each right H-fiber.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Bruhat cutoff normalized along H-fibers

Statement

Assume AC. For closed H≤G there is a continuous β:G→[0,∞) with ∫Hβ(xh) dh=1 for every x, and for every compact Q⊆G/H the part of supp⁡β lying over Q is compact. In particular, each H-fiber meets supp⁡β in a compact set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A locally compact Hausdorff group G, a closed subgroup H, fixed left Haar measure on H, and AC.

[F1]

AC implies DC and countable choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F2]

X=G/H is LCH, the quotient map is open, compact quotient sets have compact lifts, and TH:Cc(G)→Cc(X) is onto (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F3]

Every regular Lindelöf space is paracompact under countable choice (Under countable choice, every regular Lindelöf space is paracompact).

[F4]

A paracompact Hausdorff space has a locally finite partition of unity subordinate to any open cover under AC and DC (Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space admits a locally finite subordinate partition of unity).

[F5]

Compact sets inside open subsets of an LCH space admit compactly supported continuous cutoffs under DC (LCH Urysohn cutoff).

[A1]

AC means every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · construction
1.1F1F2construct

Choose a relatively compact symmetric open identity neighborhood U in G and let L=⋃n≥1Un. Then L is an open subgroup and is σ-compact, since L=⋃n(U‾)n. Its orbits on X are open and disjoint; each is a continuous image of L, hence σ-compact. As an open subspace of the LCH space X, each orbit is regular and Lindelöf. By [F1] and [F3], every orbit is paracompact, and their topological sum X is paracompact.

1.2F2F4F5chooseconstruct

Cover X by relatively compact open sets. By [F4] choose a locally finite partition of unity (ψi) subordinate to this cover; each supp⁡ψi is compact. Use [F5] to choose χi∈Cc(X) with χi=1 on supp⁡ψi, and [F2] to choose a nonnegative ui∈Cc(G) with THui=χi. Define bi=(ψi∘p)ui. It is continuous, nonnegative and compactly supported, and THbi=ψiχi=ψi.

2.1A1F1F2F3F4F5step 1.1step 1.2

Set β=∑ibi. Since (ψi) is locally finite and p is continuous, the sum is locally finite on G, hence continuous and nonnegative. Fiber integration gives THβ=∑iψi=1. For compact Q⊆X, only finitely many supp⁡ψi meet Q; the support of β over Q is contained in the finite union of the compact sets supp⁡ui∩p−1(Q). Thus it is compact. AC supplies the choices, and the construction applies to non-σ-compact X because it uses the open L-orbits from step 1.1. ∎

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Weil formula with a rho-function

Statement

Assume AC. For fixed left Haar measures dx,dh and any rho-function ρ there is a unique Radon measure μρ on G/H such that ∫Gf(x)ρ(x) dx=∫G/H∫Hf(xh) dh dμρ(xH) for every f∈Cc(G). It has full support.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: LCH G, closed H, fixed left Haar measures dx,dh, a rho-function ρ, and AC.

[F1]

The convention is ∫Gf(xh)dx=ΔG(h)−1∫Gfdx, and rho covariance is ρ(xh)=ΔH(h)ΔG(h)−1ρ(x) (Rho-function for a closed subgroup).

[F2]

The averaging map TH:Cc(G)→Cc(G/H) is onto; its proof also constructs nonnegative lifts and lifts whose averages equal 1 on a prescribed compact quotient set (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F3]

Positive integrations against compactly supported continuous kernels on LCH spaces commute (Compactly supported kernels admit commuting radon integrals).

[F4]

Every positive functional on Cc(X;R), for X LCH, is represented by a Radon measure (Positive functionals on C_c(X) are integration against a Radon measure).

[F5]

Two Radon measures agreeing on Cc(X) agree on all Borel sets under DC (Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).

[F6]

Inversion changes left Haar integration by ∫Ha(h−1) dh=∫Ha(h)ΔH(h−1) dh for nonnegative Borel a (Haar change of variables under inversion).

[A1]

AC is assumed in its choice-function form (The Axiom of Choice).

[F8]

Any point of an open subset of an LCH space admits a nonnegative compactly supported continuous bump contained in that open set (LCH Urysohn cutoff).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3F6construct

For f,g∈Cc(G), the kernel (x,h)↦f(x)g(xh)ρ(x) has compact support in G×H: its support lies in supp⁡f×((supp⁡f)−1supp⁡g∩H). Thus [F3] permits interchanging the two integrations. Right-translation change of variables in G, [F1], and inversion in H using [F6] give ∫Gf(x)(THg)(xH)ρ(x) dx=∫G(THf)(xH)g(x)ρ(x) dx. Explicitly, the inner integral at h becomes ΔH(h)−1∫Gf(yh−1)g(y)ρ(y) dy; integrating this in h and applying [F6] gives ∫Hf(yh) dh.

2.1F2step 1.1

Define Λ(THf)=∫Gfρ dx. If THf=0, let Q=p(supp⁡f) and choose g∈Cc(G) with THg=1 on Q, as supplied by the compact-set lift construction in [F2]. The identity in step 1.1 gives ∫Gfρ dx=∫G(THf)(xH)g(x)ρ(x) dx=0. Thus Λ is well defined. If ϕ≥0, choose a nonnegative lift f with THf=ϕ using [F2]; then Λ(ϕ)=∫fρ dx≥0.

3.1A1F2F4F5F7F8step 1.1step 2.1

By [F4] and [F7], Λ is represented by a Radon measure μρ, and [F5] makes it unique. The defining identity for Λ is the displayed Weil formula. For any nonempty open O⊆X, [F8] gives a nonzero nonnegative ϕ∈Cc(X) supported in O. Choose the nonnegative lift f from [F2]. Since THf=ϕ is nonzero, f is positive at some point and hence on a nonempty open subset of G. A nonzero left Haar measure has full support: its support is nonempty, closed, and invariant under every left translation, so it is all of G. The positive continuous weight ρ therefore gives ∫Gfρ dx>0. The Weil identity implies μρ(O)>0, proving full support. ∎

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes

Statement

Assume AC. Every closed H≤G admits a rho-function ρ and a full-support strongly quasi-invariant Radon measure μρ on G/H satisfying the Weil formula.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: LCH G, closed H, fixed left Haar measures and AC.

[F2]

There is a continuous nonnegative Bruhat cutoff β with ∫Hβ(xh)dh=1 and compact support over compact quotient subsets (Bruhat cutoff normalized along H-fibers).

[F3]

The modular functions are positive continuous homomorphisms and the rho covariance convention is ρ(xh)=ΔH(h)ΔG(h)−1ρ(x) (Rho-function for a closed subgroup, The modular function is a continuous homomorphism).

[F4]

Compactly supported continuous kernels have continuous partial integrals (Compactly supported kernels admit commuting radon integrals).

[F5]

Every rho-function gives a unique Radon quotient measure satisfying the Weil formula (Weil formula with a rho-function).

[F6]

TH:Cc(G)→Cc(G/H) is onto (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F7]

Radon measures agreeing on Cc(G/H) agree on Borel sets under DC (Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).

[A1]

AC is the choice-function principle (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · construction
1.1F2F3construct

Define ρ(x)=∫Hβ(xh)ΔG(h)/ΔH(h) dh. For each x, the integrand is supported on the compact fiber intersection x−1supp⁡β∩H, so its integral is finite. It is positive because β≥0, the weight is positive, and ∫Hβ(xh)dh=1.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1

Near x0 choose a compact neighborhood K. The set S=supp⁡β∩p−1(p(K)) is compact by [F2], and all h for which xh∈supp⁡β with x∈K lie in the compact set K−1S∩H. The integrand is jointly continuous with this common compact support; [F4] gives continuity of its integral. Thus ρ is positive and continuous.

2.2F3step 1.1algebra

For h0∈H, substitute k=h0h; left invariance of dh and the homomorphism laws give ρ(xh0)=ΔH(h0)ΔG(h0)−1ρ(x). Hence ρ is a rho-function.

3.1A1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2

Apply [F5] to obtain μρ and the Weil formula. The ratio Dg(xH)=ρ(g−1x)/ρ(x) is independent of the representative by [F3] and is positive continuous. For ϕ=THf, Weil and left invariance give ∫G/Hϕ(gq)dμρ(q)=∫Gf(gx)ρ(x)dx=∫Gf(y)ρ(g−1y)dy=∫G/Hϕ(q)Dg(q)dμρ(q). By [F6] this holds for every ϕ∈Cc(G/H), and [F7] identifies g∗μρ=Dgμρ. Positivity of Dg gives equivalence of measures; the ratio descends continuously jointly in (g,q) through the open quotient map. Thus μρ is strongly quasi-invariant. Full support is part of [F5]. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, PDF pp. 349–356; Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapter 7 §§3.3–3.4, PDF pp. 72–77. Full relevant text was inspected.

PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Criterion for an invariant quotient measure

Statement

Assume AC. The quotient G/H has a nonzero G-invariant Radon measure if and only if ΔG∣H=ΔH. When they agree, ρ=1 in the Weil formula supplies such a measure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: LCH G, closed H, fixed left Haar measures, and AC.

[F1]

The averaging map TH:Cc(G)→Cc(G/H) is onto (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F2]

Positive functionals on Cc have Radon representing measures, and Radon measures are determined by their Cc integrals (Positive functionals on C_c(X) are integration against a Radon measure, Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).

[F3]

Any two left Haar measures are positive scalar multiples (Uniqueness of left Haar measure up to scale).

[F4]

Right translation by h scales a left Haar integral by Δ(h)−1 (Right translation scales left Haar measure).

[F5]

ρ=1 is a rho-function exactly when ΔG∣H=ΔH; its Weil measure satisfies the quotient formula (Rho-function for a closed subgroup, Weil formula with a rho-function).

[F6]

AC implies DC as required by the cited measure results (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[A1]

AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2A1

Assume ν is a nonzero invariant Radon measure on X=G/H. Define L(f)=∫XTHf dν for real f∈Cc(G). This functional is positive. If it were zero, surjectivity [F1] would make every Cc(X) integral against ν zero, and [F2] would force ν=0. Thus L is nonzero.

1.2F1F5

Conversely suppose the modular functions agree on H. Then ρ=1 satisfies the covariance in [F5]. Let μ1 be the Weil measure. For a∈G and ϕ=THf, its translate satisfies ∫Xϕ(a−1q)dμ1(q)=∫Gf(a−1x)dx=∫Gf(x)dx=∫Xϕ(q)dμ1(q), by left invariance.

2.1F2step 1.1

For a∈G, let Laf(x)=f(a−1x). Then TH(Laf)(xH)=THf(a−1xH), so invariance of ν gives L(Laf)=L(f). By [F2], L is represented by a Radon measure λ on G; it is left invariant and nonzero, hence a left Haar measure.

3.1F3F4step 2.1choose

By [F3], λ=c dx for c>0. For h∈H, right translation gives TH(Rhf)=ΔH(h)−1THf by [F4] applied in H. Hence L(Rhf)=ΔH(h)−1L(f). Since λ=c dx, [F4] applied in G also gives L(Rhf)=ΔG(h)−1L(f). Choose f with L(f)>0; equality forces ΔG(h)=ΔH(h).

4.1A1F1F2F3F4F5F6step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 1.2choose

Surjectivity [F1] gives this equality for every Cc(X) test function. The Radon uniqueness in [F2] shows a∗μ1=μ1; the Weil measure is nonzero. This proves sufficiency and the equivalence. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, Corollary B.1.7, PDF pp. 355–356; Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapter 7 §3.3, Proposition 3, PDF pp. 74–75. Full relevant text was inspected.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Continuous quotient translation cocycle

Statement

Assume AC. For the rho-derived μρ and g∈G, d(g∗μρ)/dμρ(xH)=Dg(xH)=ρ(g−1x)/ρ(x)>0. This is independent of representative, jointly continuous, and satisfies Dg1g2(q)=Dg1(q)Dg2(g1−1q).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Closed H≤G, a rho-function ρ, its Weil measure μρ, and elements g,g1,g2∈G.

[A1]

AC is assumed as stated (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Rho-functions satisfy ρ(xh)=ΔH(h)ΔG(h)−1ρ(x) (Rho-function for a closed subgroup).

[F2]

The rho-derived measure satisfies the Weil formula (Weil formula with a rho-function).

[F3]

Every ϕ∈Cc(G/H) equals THf for some f∈Cc(G) (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F4]
[F5]

The quotient map is open and G/H is LCH (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[A2]

AC implies DC, so the Radon-measure uniqueness supplier applies (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F5construct

Define Dg(xH)=ρ(g−1x)/ρ(x). Replacing x by xh multiplies numerator and denominator by the same factor from [F1], so the ratio is well-defined and positive. The continuous function (g,x)↦ρ(g−1x)/ρ(x) is constant on fibers in the second coordinate; [F5] makes its descent through G×G→G×G/H continuous.

2.1A1A2F2F3F4step 1.1

For ϕ=THf, Weil’s formula and left invariance give ∫G/Hϕ(gq)dμρ(q)=∫Gf(gx)ρ(x)dx=∫Gf(y)ρ(g−1y)dy=∫G/Hϕ(q)Dg(q)dμρ(q). The positive continuous density is locally bounded, so it defines a Radon measure relative to the Radon measure μρ. By [F3] the equality holds on every Cc(G/H) function; [F4] identifies g∗μρ=Dgμρ. This proves the derivative formula.

3.1A1A2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

For q=xH, the ratios telescope: Dg1(q)Dg2(g1−1q)=ρ(g1−1x)ρ(x)ρ(g2−1g1−1x)ρ(g1−1x)=Dg1g2(q). Together with step 1.1, this proves the stated cocycle identity and continuity. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, Theorem B.1.4 and its quotient-measure density calculation, PDF pp. 352–354. Full relevant text was inspected.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Continuous covariant model and measurable completion

Statement

Assume AC. For a strongly continuous unitary σ:H→U(V), let Cc(G,H;V) be continuous F:G→V with F(xh)=σ(h)−1F(x) and compact support modulo H. Equip it with ∫G/H∥F(x)∥2dμρ(xH) and take its Hilbert completion. Every completed vector admits a locally strongly measurable covariant representative, and two such representatives define the same vector exactly when they agree μρ-almost everywhere in quotient norm.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, closed H≤G, a strongly continuous unitary representation σ on a Hilbert space V, and the rho-derived Radon measure μρ.

[F2]

The quotient is LCH and μρ is Radon (Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes).

[F3]

Monotone convergence applies to increasing nonnegative measurable functions (Monotone convergence for the integral).

[A1]

AC is inherited from the quotient-measure construction (The Axiom of Choice).

Definition

A continuous F:G→V is covariant if F(xh)=σ(h)−1F(x). Its norm descends to G/H by unitarity. “Compact support modulo H” means this descended norm vanishes outside a compact quotient subset. The Hilbert space in the statement is the completion of this normed space, with inner product obtained by integrating the descended pointwise inner product.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2

For two covariant sections, [F1] gives ∥F1(xh)−F2(xh)∥=∥F1(x)−F2(x)∥. Thus their difference norm descends continuously to G/H. Compact support modulo H and Radon finiteness on compact sets make its square integrable, so the stated norm is well-defined.

1.2A1F3chooseconstruct

Let (Fn) be Cauchy in this norm. Choose a subsequence (Fnk) such that ∑k∥Fnk+1−Fnk∥2<∞. The partial sums Sm(q)=∑k<m∥Fnk+1(x)−Fnk(x)∥, with q=xH, satisfy ∥Sm∥2≤∑k∥Fnk+1−Fnk∥2 by Minkowski. By [F3] and monotone convergence, S=lim⁡mSm is finite almost everywhere and has finite L2 norm. Its infinite-value set is a measurable null set in G/H. Outside its saturated preimage, the sections are pointwise Cauchy for every lift and converge to a covariant function F; set F=0 on the null fibers. On each compact neighborhood in G, the continuous approximants have jointly separable range, so their pointwise limit is locally strongly measurable. The L2 norm of the tail is bounded by the tail of the same summable series, again by Minkowski and monotone convergence. Thus the embedded L2 classes converge to F, which represents the original completion vector.

2.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Equivalent Cauchy sequences have difference norm zero and so have representatives equal almost everywhere. Conversely, representatives equal almost everywhere have zero difference norm, hence define the same completion vector. This proves the asserted identification. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1 and Remark E.1.2, PDF pp. 411–413; Vogan, On the Definition of Induced Representations, §§1–4. Relevant portions were inspected.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Well-defined induced inner product

Statement

Assume AC. For F1,F2∈Cc(G,H;V), q=xH↦⟨F1(x),F2(x)⟩ is independent of x, continuous, and compactly supported. Its μρ integral is a positive-definite inner product; the norm vanishes only when F=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Strongly continuous unitary σ, rho-derived measure μρ, and F1,F2∈Cc(G,H;V).

[A1]

AC is assumed as stated (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Covariant sections satisfy F(xh)=σ(h)−1F(x) (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).

[F2]

The representation σ in the induced model is unitary on V (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).

[F3]

The quotient map is open and G/H is LCH (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F4]

The rho-derived Radon measure has full support (Weil formula with a rho-function).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3A1

For h∈H, covariance and unitarity give ⟨F1(xh),F2(xh)⟩=⟨σ(h)−1F1(x),σ(h)−1F2(x)⟩=⟨F1(x),F2(x)⟩. Thus the scalar is independent of the representative. Its continuous lift to G descends continuously because the quotient map is open; its support lies in the intersection of the compact quotient supports.

2.1A1F4step 1.1algebra

Radon finiteness on that compact support makes the integral finite. For F1=F2=F, the integral is nonnegative. If it were zero but F were nonzero at some x, continuity would make ∥F∥2 positive on a nonempty open subset of G/H, which has positive measure by full support [F4], a contradiction. Hence the norm is positive definite; integrating the pointwise sesquilinear form gives the asserted inner product. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Definition E.1.6, PDF pp. 412–413. Full relevant text was inspected.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Density of averaged covariant generators

Statement

Assume AC. For f∈Cc(G) and v∈V, the section ξf,v(x)=∫Hf(xh)σ(h)v dh belongs to Cc(G,H;V). Their finite linear span is uniformly dense on compact quotient supports in Cc(G,H;V), and the Hilbert completion equals the locally strongly measurable covariant L2 sections modulo μρ-almost-everywhere equality.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, closed H≤G, a strongly continuous unitary σ on V, and the rho-derived quotient measure.

[F1]

Covariant sections and their quotient norm are defined in the induced model (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).

[F2]

Their integrated inner product is positive definite, and the measure has full support (Well-defined induced inner product).

[F3]

The averaging map is onto with nonnegative lifts, compact quotient sets have compact lifts, and compact subsets of an open set admit compactly supported cutoffs (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H), LCH Urysohn cutoff).

[F4]

A finite open cover near a compact set admits a subordinate compactly supported partition of unity under DC (A finite compactly supported partition of unity near a compact set).

[F5]

Cc is dense in L2 for Radon measures under DC (C_c(X) is dense in L^p(mu) for a Radon measure).

[F6]

Strong measurability and integrability of the norm imply Bochner integrability (Bochner integrability criterion).

[F8]

The Weil formula holds for Cc(G), and Radon measures agreeing on Cc agree on Borel sets (Weil formula with a rho-function, Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).

[A1]

AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3F6construct

For fixed x, the integrand defining ξf,v is supported on the compact set x−1supp⁡f∩H, so the Bochner integral exists. Replacing x by xh0 and substituting k=h0h gives ξf,v(xh0)=σ(h0)−1ξf,v(x). For a relatively compact neighborhood N of a fixed x0, every contributing h lies in the compact set K=N‾−1supp⁡f∩H. The integrand (x,h)↦f(xh)σ(h)v is jointly continuous on a compact neighborhood times K, so its uniform variation in h tends to zero as x→x0; the integral therefore varies continuously. Its quotient support lies in p(supp⁡f), which is compact. Thus ξf,v∈Cc(G,H;V).

1.2A1F3F5F6F7F8choose

Now let F be a locally strongly measurable covariant section with finite quotient L2 norm. By [F5] choose ψ∈Cc(G/H) close in scalar L2 to q↦∥F(q)∥; outside Q=supp⁡ψ the L2 tail of F is therefore small. Put FQ=1QF and choose a cutoff χ∈Cc(G/H) with χ=1 on Q by [F3], then choose a nonnegative lift u0∈Cc(G) with THu0=χ by [F3]. The measurable map U=u0FQ is supported in a compact subset of G. For ϕ∈Cc(G/H), apply the Weil formula [F8] to f(y)=(ϕ∘p)(y)∣u0(y)∣2. It identifies the finite Radon measures B↦∫p−1(B)∣u0(y)∣2ρ(y) dy and B↦∫BTH(∣u0∣2)(q) dμρ(q), first on Cc(G/H) and then on Borel sets by [F8]. Integrating q↦∥FQ(q)∥2 gives ∫G∥U(x)∥2ρ(x) dx=∫Q∥F(q)∥2TH(∣u0∣2)(q) dμρ(q)<∞. On its compact support ρ dx is finite, so [F6] makes U Bochner square integrable.

2.1F1F2F3F4A1step 1.1chooseconstruct

Let F∈Cc(G,H;V) and K=supp⁡G/HF. Choose a cutoff χ∈Cc(G/H) with χ=1 on K by [F3], then a nonnegative lift u0∈Cc(G) with THu0=χ by [F3]. The map u0F is continuous and compactly supported on G. Cover its compact support by finitely many open sets on which F varies by less than ϵ in norm; [F4] supplies a subordinate partition θj. For chosen vj from each patch, u0F is uniformly within ∥u0∥∞ϵ of ∑j(u0θj)vj. Averaging the latter gives a finite sum of generators. The averaging error is bounded uniformly on the compact quotient support because, after choosing a compact lift C of that support, all relevant h lie in the fixed compact set C−1supp⁡u0∩H, of finite Haar measure. Since A(u0F)=THu0 F=F on K and both vanish off K, the generators approximate F uniformly.

3.1F1F3F5F6F8step 1.2chooseconstruct

Strong measurability approximates U by finite-valued simple maps; scalar Cc density [F5] approximates their coefficients in L2(G,ρ dx). Multiplying by one fixed compactly supported cutoff equal to one on supp⁡U makes all approximants supported in a common compact C. The averaging operator A(W)(x)=∫Hσ(h)W(xh) dh is bounded on continuous maps supported in C. If C=∅ then W=0 and the bound is immediate. Otherwise choose a compact lift C0 of p(C) and let m=dh(C0−1C∩H)<∞. For each q∈p(C) choose a representative x∈C0. Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∥A(W)(x)∥2≤m TH(∥W∥2)(q). Integrating over G/H and applying [F8] to ∥W∥2∈Cc(G) yields ∥A(W)∥22≤m∫G∥W(y)∥2ρ(y) dy=m∥W∥L2(G,ρ dy)2. Therefore averages of the finite-sum Cc(G,V) approximants converge to A(U)=FQ. Each average is a finite sum of the generators in step 1.1. Letting the discarded tail tend to zero proves density in the full measurable L2 space. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Proposition E.1.1 and Lemma E.1.3, PDF pp. 411–414. Full text was inspected; the vector-valued approximation and the compact-fiber bound are supplied explicitly here.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Unitary cocycle-corrected left action

Statement

Assume AC. For g∈G and F∈Cc(G,H;V), define (Πρ(g)F)(x)=Dg(xH)1/2F(g−1x)=[ρ(g−1x)/ρ(x)]1/2F(g−1x). This is covariant, preserves the inner product, satisfies Πρ(g1)Πρ(g2)=Πρ(g1g2), and extends to a unitary on the completion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The induced model, its quotient measure, and g,g1,g2∈G.

[A1]

AC is assumed as stated (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Dg is positive, representative-independent, and satisfies the density cocycle (Continuous quotient translation cocycle).

[F2]

Covariant functions and their norm are defined by the induced model (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).

[F3]

The integrated inner product is positive definite (Well-defined induced inner product).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2A1

Since Dg is a function on G/H, it is right H-invariant. Thus F(g−1xh)=σ(h)−1F(g−1x) proves covariance of Πρ(g)F. Its quotient support is the translate by g of the compact support of F.

2.1F1step 1.1

Applying twice gives Πρ(g1)Πρ(g2)F(x)=(Dg1(xH)Dg2(g1−1xH))1/2F(g2−1g1−1x)=Πρ(g1g2)F(x) by the cocycle identity [F1]. Also Πρ(e)=I, so Πρ(g−1) is the inverse.

3.1A1F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1

The cocycle identity with g1=g−1,g2=g gives Dg(grH)Dg−1(rH)=1. The change-of-measure formula d((g−1)∗μρ)/dμρ=Dg−1 then yields ∥Πρ(g)F∥22=∫Dg(q)∥F(g−1q)∥2dμρ(q)=∫Dg(gr)Dg−1(r)∥F(r)∥2dμρ(r)=∥F∥22. Thus the operator is an isometry on the dense continuous model, and its inverse from step 2.1 makes its extension unitary on the completion. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Proposition E.1.4, PDF pp. 413–414. Full relevant text was inspected.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Strong continuity of unitary induction

Statement

Assume AC. The induced unitary action Πρ is strongly continuous: ∥Πρ(g)F−F∥2→0 as g→e for every vector in the induced Hilbert space.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the induced representation constructed from H≤G, σ, ρ, and μρ.

[F1]

Each Πρ(g) is unitary (Unitary cocycle-corrected left action).

[F2]

Continuous compact-quotient-support sections are dense in the induced Hilbert space (Density of averaged covariant generators).

[F3]

Compact quotient sets have compact lifts, the quotient is LCH, and its Radon measure is finite on compact sets (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H), Weil formula with a rho-function).

[A1]

AC is assumed for the density and compact-lift construction (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2F3choose

Fix F∈Cc(G,H;V) and let K be its compact quotient support. Choose a compact identity neighborhood C⊂G and put Q=K∪CK, a compact subset of G/H. For g∈C both F and Πρ(g)F vanish off Q.

2.1A1F1F3step 1.1

Choose a compact lift K0⊂G of Q using [F3] and [A1]. On C×K0, joint continuity of (g,x)↦Dg(xH)1/2F(g−1x) and compactness imply uniform convergence to F(x) as g→e. The fiber norm of the difference is right-H invariant, so this gives uniform convergence on Q. Since μρ(Q)<∞, its L2 norm is at most μρ(Q)1/2 times that uniform bound, and tends to zero.

3.1A1F1F2step 2.1choose

For arbitrary u in the completion and ϵ>0, choose F∈Cc(G,H;V) with ∥u−F∥2<ϵ by [F2]. Unitarity gives ∥Πρ(g)u−u∥2≤2ϵ+∥Πρ(g)F−F∥2. Step 2.1 makes the last term tend to zero; then let ϵ↓0. This proves strong continuity for every vector. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Proposition E.1.4, PDF pp. 413–414. Full relevant proof was inspected.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Unitary induction from a closed subgroup

Statement

Assume AC. For every closed H≤G and strongly continuous unitary representation σ:H→U(V) on a Hilbert space V, the completion of covariant compact-coset-support functions with the rho quotient norm and cocycle-corrected left action is a strongly continuous unitary G-representation Ind⁡HGσ. If H=G it identifies with σ; if H={e}, one may normalize ρ so the quotient measure is left Haar and identify the model with L2(G;V) carrying λG⊗IV, (λG(g)⊗IV)F(x)=F(g−1x); for V=C this is the scalar left regular representation. If μρ is invariant the cocycle is one.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, closed H≤G, and a strongly continuous unitary σ of H.

[F1]

A rho-function and full-support strongly quasi-invariant Radon measure exist (Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes).

[F2]

The covariant function model and completion are defined (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).

[F3]

The integrated inner product is positive definite (Well-defined induced inner product).

[F4]

The cocycle-corrected action is unitary (Unitary cocycle-corrected left action).

[F5]

The action is strongly continuous (Strong continuity of unitary induction).

[F7]

The density derivative and its cocycle identity are given by the homogeneous-measure cocycle lemma (Continuous quotient translation cocycle).

[F6]

For H={e}, the quotient formula identifies the measure with Haar measure (Weil formula with a rho-function).

[A1]

AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2F3A1

Choose ρ and μρ by [F1] under [A1]. The covariance equations make the pointwise inner product a well-defined positive form by [F2,F3]. Its completion is a Hilbert space.

2.1F2F4F5step 1.1

The formula Πρ(g)F(x)=Dg(xH)1/2F(g−1x) preserves the dense covariant model and is a unitary representation by [F4]. The strong continuity lemma [F5] extends this property to every completed vector. This gives Ind⁡HGσ.

3.1A1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1step 2.1

If H=G, then G/H is a singleton and every covariant section is determined by v=F(e), with F(x)=σ(x)−1v. Rescale ρ by a positive constant so the quotient point has measure one; evaluation at e is then an isometry, and the action becomes v↦σ(g)v. If H={e}, put c=dh({e}) and choose the constant rho-function ρ(x)=c. The Weil formula [F6] then gives μρ=dx, so the model completes from Cc(G;V) to L2(G;V). The action is F(x)↦F(g−1x), namely λG⊗IV; for V=C this is the scalar left regular representation. If μρ is invariant, then d(g∗μρ)/dμρ=1; the continuous density Dg is therefore one everywhere by full support, so the action has no cocycle factor. These are the three stated reductions. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Definition E.1.6 and Remark E.1.7, PDF pp. 412–414; Vogan, On the Definition of Induced Representations, §§1–4. Complete relevant text was inspected.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Local densities for equivalent Radon quotient measures

Statement

Assume AC. If μ and ν are equivalent Radon measures on G/H, then on each open σ-compact component of a disjoint cover of G/H there is an almost-everywhere unique finite positive Radon–Nikodym density w with dν=w dμ. These densities define a unitary multiplication map between the completed locally measurable L2 section spaces, component by component; no global Borel density is asserted on a non-σ-finite quotient.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: LCH G, closed H, equivalent Radon measures μ,ν on X=G/H, and AC.

[F1]

AC supplies dependent and countable choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F2]
[F3]

The open-subgroup-orbit decomposition of X has open σ-compact components (the construction is given in the proof below).

[F4]

On a σ-finite measure space, absolute continuity gives a measurable Radon–Nikodym density, unique almost everywhere; equivalent measures give a density positive and finite almost everywhere (A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density).

[A1]

AC permits selecting a density representative on each component (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · construction
1.1F1F2F3construct

Choose a relatively compact symmetric open identity neighborhood U⊆G and set L=⋃n≥1Un. Then L is open and σ-compact. Its action on X partitions X into disjoint open orbits: the orbit through xH is the image of L under ℓ↦ℓxH, so it is σ-compact; it is LCH by [F2]. The compact closures of the sets Un give each orbit a countable compact cover.

1.2F4choose

Restrict μ and ν to one orbit. Each restriction is σ-finite because it is Radon and the orbit is a countable union of compact sets of finite measure. Equivalence gives νi≪μi and μi≪νi; [F4] supplies a measurable wi with dνi=wi dμi, where 0<wi<∞ almost everywhere. The RN uniqueness clause makes wi unique up to μi-null sets.

2.1A1F4step 1.2∎

By [A1] choose one measurable version separately on each orbit; all density operations below are performed componentwise. On each component, multiplication by wi−1/2 maps L2(μi;V) isometrically onto L2(νi;V), since ∫∥wi−1/2F∥2dνi=∫∥F∥2dμi; its inverse is multiplication by wi1/2. Taking the Hilbert direct sum of these componentwise unitaries gives the asserted map on the completed locally measurable section spaces.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Independence of rho and equivalent quotient representative

Statement

Assume AC. Two rho-functions ρ1,ρ2 with their Weil measures give unitarily equivalent induced representations by U(F)(x)=[ρ1(x)/ρ2(x)]1/2F(x). More generally, an equivalent quasi-invariant Radon representative ν gives the same completed measurable-section representation via its positive local density and translated Radon–Nikodym cocycle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the induced model and action, two rho-functions and Weil measures, or an equivalent quasi-invariant Radon measure ν.

[F1]

The Weil formula and uniqueness identify each quotient measure (Weil formula with a rho-function).

[F2]

Covariant sections use the quotient norm and cocycle action (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion, Unitary cocycle-corrected left action).

[F3]

Equivalent Radon measures have positive finite local densities and componentwise unitary multiplication maps (Local densities for equivalent Radon quotient measures).

[F4]

The rho-derived density is Dg(q)=ρ(g−1x)/ρ(x) (Continuous quotient translation cocycle).

[F5]

The quotient averaging map TH is onto Cc(G/H) (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F6]

Radon measures agreeing on Cc(G/H) agree on Borel sets (Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).

[A1]

AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F5F6A1

Put a(q)=ρ2(x)/ρ1(x) for q=xH. The rho covariance makes this ratio independent of representative and positive continuous. If ϕ=THf, the two Weil formulas give ∫Xϕ dμρ2=∫Gfρ2dx=∫Gfρ1a dx=∫Xϕ(q)a(q) dμρ1(q). The measure aμρ1 is Radon because a is positive continuous and bounded on compact sets. Surjectivity of TH gives equality of its Cc integrals with those of μρ2, and [F6] identifies dμρ2=a dμρ1.

2.1F2step 1.1

Define U(F)=a−1/2F=[ρ1/ρ2]1/2F. The ratio is H-invariant, so covariance is preserved, and step 1.1 gives ∥UF∥ρ22=∫Xa−1∥F∥2dμρ2=∥F∥ρ12. The inverse multiplier is a1/2, hence U extends onto the Hilbert completions.

2.2F2F4step 1.1

For the action, both sides of UΠ1(g)F=Π2(g)UF multiply F(g−1x) by the same scalar: a(xH)−1/2Dg1(xH)1/2=Dg2(xH)1/2a(g−1xH)−1/2, which follows by substituting a=ρ2/ρ1 into [F4]. Thus the rho choices give equivalent representations.

3.1A1F1F2F3F4F5F6step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2

For an equivalent quasi-invariant ν, [F3] supplies local densities w=dν/dμρ>0 on each open sigma-compact component. Multiplication by w−1/2 is a unitary from the μρ section space to the ν section space, since dν=w dμρ. On each open σ-compact target component, g−1 maps it to an open σ-compact set meeting only countably many components, so the componentwise densities are measurable there. Pushing wμρ forward under q↦gq gives the local Radon--Nikodym derivative Dgν(q)=w(g−1q)w(q)Dgρ(q) almost everywhere on that component. The componentwise multiplication maps assemble on the Hilbert direct sum, and substitution in the action formula gives UΠρ(g)=Πν(g)U almost everywhere. Thus the general measure representative gives the same unitary representation. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1 Theorem B.1.4(iii) and Appendix E §E.1 Proposition E.1.5, PDF pp. 353–355 and 414–415. Full relevant text was inspected; local density handling is expanded here for non-σ-finite quotients.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Composition of Weil quotient integrals

Statement

Assume AC. For closed L≤H≤G and rho-functions ρGL,ρGH,ρHL with their Weil measures, define rx(hL)=ρGL(xh)ρGH(xh)ρHL(h). Then rx is positive continuous on H/L, and for ϕ∈Cc(G/L), ∫G/Lϕ(q)dμGL(q)=∫G/H∫H/Lϕ(xhL)rx(hL)dμHL(hL)dμGH(xH). The inner integral is independent of the chosen representative x.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, closed L≤H≤G, fixed compatible left Haar measures, rho-functions and Weil measures.

[F1]

The rho covariance law for each subgroup pair (Rho-function for a closed subgroup).

[F2]

The Weil formula for G/L, G/H, and H/L (Weil formula with a rho-function).

[F3]

TL:Cc(G)→Cc(G/L) is onto (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F4]

Compactly supported continuous kernels have continuous compactly supported partial integrals, and the associated positive Radon integrations commute (Compactly supported kernels admit commuting radon integrals).

[A1]

AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1construct

Under h↦hl, the numerator of rx is multiplied by ΔL(l)ΔG(l)−1; the two denominator factors multiply together by the same amount. Thus rx(hl)=rx(h). Its positive continuous lift on H therefore descends continuously to H/L.

1.2F1F2construct

Fix x∈G and put ux(h)=f(xh)ρGL(xh)/(ρGH(xh)ρHL(h)) for f∈Cc(G). The support in H is compact. By [F1], this function is constant under right L in its rho ratio, and ux(hl)=f(xhl)rx(hL). The H/L Weil formula gives ∫H/LTLf(xhL)rx(hL)dμHL(hL)=∫Hux(h)ρHL(h)dh=∫Hf(xh)ρGL(xh)ρGH(xh)dh. All integrals are finite by compact support.

2.1step 1.2algebra

The final expression in step 1.2 is unchanged when x is replaced by xk for k∈H: substitute j=kh and use left invariance of Haar measure on H. Hence it descends to a function of xH.

3.1A1F2F3F4step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1

Integrate step 1.2 over G/H. Set v(x)=f(x)ρGL(x)/ρGH(x)∈Cc(G). The inner expression in step 1.2 is THv(xH); local compact support and [F4] make this a continuous compactly supported quotient function. Applying the G/H Weil formula to v shows that the iterated integral is ∫Gf(x)ρGL(x)dx. Applying the G/L Weil formula to f gives the same value as ∫G/LTLf dμGL. Thus the asserted identity holds for ϕ=TLf; surjectivity [F3] proves it for every Cc(G/L) test function. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.2, proof route preceding Theorem E.2.4, PDF pp. 416–419. The source’s induction-in-stages argument is a sketch; this quotient-integral composition is written out here.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Induction in stages for closed subgroup chains

Statement

Assume AC. If L≤H≤G are closed locally compact subgroups and σ is a strongly continuous unitary L-representation, then Ind⁡LGσ is canonically unitarily equivalent, after the selected rho and measure identifications, to Ind⁡HG(Ind⁡LHσ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, closed L≤H≤G, strongly continuous unitary σ of L, and compatible rho-functions and quotient measures.

[F1]

The quotient integration composition formula with density rx(hL) (Composition of Weil quotient integrals).

[F2]

Induced Hilbert spaces have dense compactly supported covariant generators (Density of averaged covariant generators).

[F3]

The induced group actions are unitary (Unitary cocycle-corrected left action).

[F4]

Compact quotient sets have compact lifts and compact-kernel integrals are continuous (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H), Compactly supported kernels admit commuting radon integrals).

[A1]

AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F4constructA1

Write τ=Ind⁡LHσ and, for F∈Cc(G,L;V), define (UF)(x)(h)=rx(hL)1/2F(xh), using the continuous covariant representative on H for the inner section. Since rx is right-L invariant and F(xhl)=σ(l)−1F(xh), this is an L-covariant inner section. For k∈H, the identity rxk(hL)=ρHL(kh)ρHL(h)rx(khL) and the induced action formula show UF(xk)=τ(k)−1UF(x). Its outer support is contained in the image in G/H of the compact support of F in G/L. To check continuity in the inner norm near x0, choose a compact neighborhood C of x0 and a compact lift K0⊂G of the quotient support of F. If x∈C and xhL∈supp⁡G/LF, then xh=zl for some z∈K0,l∈L; hence x−1z=hl−1∈H and hL=x−1zL. The image in H/L of the closed subset {(x,z)∈C×K0:x−1z∈H} is a fixed compact set containing all these inner supports. Lift that compact set to a compact subset of H. On this lift, continuity of the rho ratios and of F gives uniform convergence as x→x0; its quotient measure is finite, so the inner L2 norm also converges. Thus UF belongs to the continuous outer model.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra

Apply [F1] to the continuous compactly supported scalar function q↦∥F(q)∥2. It gives ∥UF∥2=∫G/H∫H/Lrx(hL)∥F(xh)∥2dμHLdμGH=∫G/L∥F(q)∥2dμGL=∥F∥2. Hence U extends to an isometry. The rho ratios also give UΠGL(g)=ΠGH(g)U: after expanding both sides, the only required cancellation is ρGH(g−1xh)/ρGH(g−1x)=ρGH(xh)/ρGH(x), which is exactly the rho covariance under h∈H.

3.1A1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1

By [F2], outer generators Ξf(v)(x)=∫Hf(xk)τ(k)v dk with f∈Cc(G) and v∈W=Ind⁡LHσ have dense span. For fixed f, this generator depends continuously on v: choose a compact lift C of pGH(supp⁡f); then ∥Ξf(v)(x)∥≤∥f∥∞dh(C−1supp⁡f∩H) ∥v∥, and its quotient support lies in the compact set pGH(supp⁡f). Since that set has finite measure, replacing v by a dense inner compactly supported covariant section approximates Ξf(v) in the outer norm. It therefore suffices to treat such v. The resulting Ξ(x) has a continuous covariant representative H→V, so evaluation at each h∈H is defined. Outer covariance gives Ξ(xh)(e)=(ρHL(h)ρHL(e))1/2Ξ(x)(h). Set F(y)=ry(eL)−1/2Ξ(y)(e). From the definition of r, rxh(eL)=rx(hL)ρHL(h)ρHL(e), so the displayed covariance identity gives rx(hL)1/2F(xh)=Ξ(x)(h) for all h∈H. For l∈L, inner covariance gives Ξ(y)(l)=σ(l)−1Ξ(y)(e), and the same identities imply F(yl)=σ(l)−1F(y). The function F is continuous: on a compact neighborhood of y0, the k-integral defining Ξ(y)(e) is supported in a fixed compact subset of H, and its integrand is jointly continuous, so [F4] applies. Its support modulo L is compact: nonzero values require yk∈supp⁡f and k−1L∈supp⁡v, hence lie in the image of a product of compact lifts of these supports. Thus F∈Cc(G,L;V) and UF=Ξ. The dense outer generators lie in the range, so the closed isometric range is the whole target. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.2, Theorem E.2.4, PDF pp. 416–419. The published proof is explicitly a sketch; this proof records the norm identity and dense-range argument.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources