Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes

Statement

Assume AC. Every closed H≤G admits a rho-function ρ and a full-support strongly quasi-invariant Radon measure μρ on G/H satisfying the Weil formula.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: LCH G, closed H, fixed left Haar measures and AC.

[F2]

There is a continuous nonnegative Bruhat cutoff β with ∫Hβ(xh)dh=1 and compact support over compact quotient subsets (Bruhat cutoff normalized along H-fibers).

[F3]

The modular functions are positive continuous homomorphisms and the rho covariance convention is ρ(xh)=ΔH(h)ΔG(h)−1ρ(x) (Rho-function for a closed subgroup, The modular function is a continuous homomorphism).

[F4]

Compactly supported continuous kernels have continuous partial integrals (Compactly supported kernels admit commuting radon integrals).

[F5]

Every rho-function gives a unique Radon quotient measure satisfying the Weil formula (Weil formula with a rho-function).

[F6]

TH:Cc(G)→Cc(G/H) is onto (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F7]

Radon measures agreeing on Cc(G/H) agree on Borel sets under DC (Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).

[A1]

AC is the choice-function principle (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · construction
1.1F2F3construct

Define ρ(x)=∫Hβ(xh)ΔG(h)/ΔH(h) dh. For each x, the integrand is supported on the compact fiber intersection x−1supp⁡β∩H, so its integral is finite. It is positive because β≥0, the weight is positive, and ∫Hβ(xh)dh=1.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1

Near x0 choose a compact neighborhood K. The set S=supp⁡β∩p−1(p(K)) is compact by [F2], and all h for which xh∈supp⁡β with x∈K lie in the compact set K−1S∩H. The integrand is jointly continuous with this common compact support; [F4] gives continuity of its integral. Thus ρ is positive and continuous.

2.2F3step 1.1algebra

For h0∈H, substitute k=h0h; left invariance of dh and the homomorphism laws give ρ(xh0)=ΔH(h0)ΔG(h0)−1ρ(x). Hence ρ is a rho-function.

3.1A1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2

Apply [F5] to obtain μρ and the Weil formula. The ratio Dg(xH)=ρ(g−1x)/ρ(x) is independent of the representative by [F3] and is positive continuous. For ϕ=THf, Weil and left invariance give ∫G/Hϕ(gq)dμρ(q)=∫Gf(gx)ρ(x)dx=∫Gf(y)ρ(g−1y)dy=∫G/Hϕ(q)Dg(q)dμρ(q). By [F6] this holds for every ϕ∈Cc(G/H), and [F7] identifies g∗μρ=Dgμρ. Positivity of Dg gives equivalence of measures; the ratio descends continuously jointly in (g,q) through the open quotient map. Thus μρ is strongly quasi-invariant. Full support is part of [F5]. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, PDF pp. 349–356; Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapter 7 §§3.3–3.4, PDF pp. 72–77. Full relevant text was inspected.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources