How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Uniform lattice quotient and quasi-regular action
Statement
Assume AC. If is a closed discrete cocompact subgroup of locally compact , then is unimodular, has a finite invariant Radon measure, and identifies with the quasi-regular action on without a cocycle.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, LCH , and closed discrete such that is compact.
The rho covariance law uses the stated modular convention (Rho-function for a closed subgroup).
A discrete group is unimodular (Compact, discrete and abelian groups are unimodular).
Every closed subgroup admits a rho-derived quasi-invariant Radon measure with density cocycle (Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes, Continuous quotient translation cocycle).
A nonzero -invariant quotient measure exists exactly when (Criterion for an invariant quotient measure).
The induced representation is unitary and its scalar covariant model is given by the induction theorem (Unitary induction from a closed subgroup).
AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Since is discrete, [F1] gives . The function obeys , so it is a rho-function by [F5]. Its cocycle is constant: .
Let be its quotient measure. Since is compact, : finiteness is Radon compact-finiteness and positivity follows from full support. The pushforward has the same total mass as , while [F2] gives . Therefore for every , and is unimodular.
Now , so [F3] gives a nonzero invariant Radon measure on ; compactness makes it finite. For its cocycle is identically one. Scalar covariance says , so sections are exactly functions on , and the action is with the quotient norm. This is the quasi-regular representation, as claimed by [F4]. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1 and Appendix E §E.1, Proposition B.1.6 and Example E.1.8(ii), PDF pp. 355–356 and 414. Full relevant text was inspected.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendices B and E (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapters 1 and 7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David Vogan, Unitary Representations of Locally Compact Groups and Induced Representations (standard reference, not scraped)