Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniform lattice quotient and quasi-regular action

Statement

Assume AC. If Γ is a closed discrete cocompact subgroup of locally compact G, then G is unimodular, G/Γ has a finite invariant Radon measure, and Ind⁡ΓG1 identifies with the quasi-regular action on L2(G/Γ) without a cocycle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, LCH G, and closed discrete Γ such that G/Γ is compact.

[F5]

The rho covariance law uses the stated modular convention (Rho-function for a closed subgroup).

[F1]

A discrete group is unimodular (Compact, discrete and abelian groups are unimodular).

[F2]

Every closed subgroup admits a rho-derived quasi-invariant Radon measure with density cocycle Dg (Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes, Continuous quotient translation cocycle).

[F3]

A nonzero G-invariant quotient measure exists exactly when ΔG∣Γ=ΔΓ (Criterion for an invariant quotient measure).

[F4]

The induced representation is unitary and its scalar covariant model is given by the induction theorem (Unitary induction from a closed subgroup).

[A1]

AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F5algebra

Since Γ is discrete, [F1] gives ΔΓ=1. The function ρ(x)=ΔG(x)−1 obeys ρ(xγ)=ΔΓ(γ)ΔG(γ)−1ρ(x), so it is a rho-function by [F5]. Its cocycle is constant: Dg(xΓ)=ρ(g−1x)/ρ(x)=ΔG(g).

2.1A1F2step 1.1

Let μρ be its quotient measure. Since G/Γ is compact, 0<μρ(G/Γ)<∞: finiteness is Radon compact-finiteness and positivity follows from full support. The pushforward g∗μρ has the same total mass as μρ, while [F2] gives g∗μρ=ΔG(g)μρ. Therefore ΔG(g)=1 for every g, and G is unimodular.

3.1A1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1

Now ΔG∣Γ=ΔΓ=1, so [F3] gives a nonzero invariant Radon measure on G/Γ; compactness makes it finite. For ρ=1 its cocycle is identically one. Scalar covariance says F(xγ)=F(x), so sections are exactly functions on G/Γ, and the action is F(q)↦F(g−1q) with the quotient L2 norm. This is the quasi-regular representation, as claimed by [F4]. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1 and Appendix E §E.1, Proposition B.1.6 and Example E.1.8(ii), PDF pp. 355–356 and 414. Full relevant text was inspected.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources