How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Induction from the trivial subgroup
Statement
Assume AC. For with its standard Haar measure of mass and the one-dimensional trivial representation, choose . Then , is left Haar measure, and is the left regular representation on , .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and an LCH group with a left Haar measure.
The closed-subgroup induction construction and action (Unitary induction from a closed subgroup).
The Weil formula and uniqueness of its quotient measure (Weil formula with a rho-function).
For the trivial subgroup the left regular representation acts by (Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group).
AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
When , the rho covariance imposes no restriction, and is valid. The averaging map is identity and the Weil formula becomes . Radon uniqueness [F2] identifies with left Haar measure.
Covariance is empty for the trivial subgroup, so the dense model is and its completion is . The density cocycle is , hence the induced action is , exactly [F3]. The construction theorem [F1] supplies strong continuity and unitarity. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Example E.1.8(i), PDF p. 414; Vogan, On the Definition of Induced Representations, §2. All relevant lines were inspected.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendices B and E (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapters 1 and 7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David Vogan, Unitary Representations of Locally Compact Groups and Induced Representations (standard reference, not scraped)