Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 4 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 4 also cleared it.

Induced Unitary Representations of Locally Compact Groups — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples apply the quotient construction and conventions from the main page.

Induction from the trivial subgroup identifies with the left regular representation on L2(G). For a closed discrete cocompact subgroup, the finite invariant quotient measure removes the Radon–Nikodym cocycle and induction of the trivial representation is the quasi-regular action. When G is finite, quotient integration is the finite coset sum and the completed model is exactly the algebraic covariant-function module with its counting inner product.

The positive affine group gives a contrasting case. Its quotient by the dilation subgroup is homeomorphic to R, and a Haar measure class there is quasi-invariant under affine transformations. The explicit left Haar density a−2 db da gives ΔG(0,a)=a−1, while the dilation subgroup is abelian and has modular function 1. The invariant-measure criterion therefore rules out a nonzero invariant Radon measure on this quotient.

The quotient-measure constructions in the trivial-subgroup and cocompact examples inherit the page’s explicit AC qualification. The affine counterexample also assumes AC for Haar/Radon suppliers and states the AC-to-countable-choice step needed to obtain Radon Lebesgue measure on the group manifold. The finite counting model is proved directly by a finite coset sum.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Induction from the trivial subgroup

Statement

Assume AC. For H={e} with its standard Haar measure of mass 1 and the one-dimensional trivial representation, choose ρ=1. Then G/H=G, μρ is left Haar measure, and Ind⁡{e}G1 is the left regular representation on L2(G), (λ(g)f)(x)=f(g−1x).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and an LCH group G with a left Haar measure.

[F1]

The closed-subgroup induction construction and action (Unitary induction from a closed subgroup).

[F2]

The Weil formula and uniqueness of its quotient measure (Weil formula with a rho-function).

[F3]

For the trivial subgroup the left regular representation acts by f(x)↦f(g−1x) (Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group).

[A1]

AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2givenA1

When H={e}, the rho covariance imposes no restriction, and ρ=1 is valid. The averaging map TH is identity and the Weil formula becomes ∫Gf(x)dx=∫Gf(x)dμρ(x). Radon uniqueness [F2] identifies μρ with left Haar measure.

2.1A1F1F2F3step 1.1

Covariance is empty for the trivial subgroup, so the dense model is Cc(G) and its completion is L2(G). The density cocycle is Dg(x)=1, hence the induced action is F(x)↦F(g−1x), exactly [F3]. The construction theorem [F1] supplies strong continuity and unitarity. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Example E.1.8(i), PDF p. 414; Vogan, On the Definition of Induced Representations, §2. All relevant lines were inspected.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Uniform lattice quotient and quasi-regular action

Statement

Assume AC. If Γ is a closed discrete cocompact subgroup of locally compact G, then G is unimodular, G/Γ has a finite invariant Radon measure, and Ind⁡ΓG1 identifies with the quasi-regular action on L2(G/Γ) without a cocycle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, LCH G, and closed discrete Γ such that G/Γ is compact.

[F5]

The rho covariance law uses the stated modular convention (Rho-function for a closed subgroup).

[F1]

A discrete group is unimodular (Compact, discrete and abelian groups are unimodular).

[F2]

Every closed subgroup admits a rho-derived quasi-invariant Radon measure with density cocycle Dg (Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes, Continuous quotient translation cocycle).

[F3]

A nonzero G-invariant quotient measure exists exactly when ΔG∣Γ=ΔΓ (Criterion for an invariant quotient measure).

[F4]

The induced representation is unitary and its scalar covariant model is given by the induction theorem (Unitary induction from a closed subgroup).

[A1]

AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F5algebra

Since Γ is discrete, [F1] gives ΔΓ=1. The function ρ(x)=ΔG(x)−1 obeys ρ(xγ)=ΔΓ(γ)ΔG(γ)−1ρ(x), so it is a rho-function by [F5]. Its cocycle is constant: Dg(xΓ)=ρ(g−1x)/ρ(x)=ΔG(g).

2.1A1F2step 1.1

Let μρ be its quotient measure. Since G/Γ is compact, 0<μρ(G/Γ)<∞: finiteness is Radon compact-finiteness and positivity follows from full support. The pushforward g∗μρ has the same total mass as μρ, while [F2] gives g∗μρ=ΔG(g)μρ. Therefore ΔG(g)=1 for every g, and G is unimodular.

3.1A1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1

Now ΔG∣Γ=ΔΓ=1, so [F3] gives a nonzero invariant Radon measure on G/Γ; compactness makes it finite. For ρ=1 its cocycle is identically one. Scalar covariance says F(xγ)=F(x), so sections are exactly functions on G/Γ, and the action is F(q)↦F(g−1q) with the quotient L2 norm. This is the quasi-regular representation, as claimed by [F4]. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1 and Appendix E §E.1, Proposition B.1.6 and Example E.1.8(ii), PDF pp. 355–356 and 414. Full relevant text was inspected.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Finite-group counting model for induction

Example

Let G be finite, H≤G, and let σ:H→U(V) be a unitary representation on a complex Hilbert space V. Give both groups counting measure and take ρ=1. The induced Hilbert space consists of functions F:G→V satisfying F(gh)=σ(h)−1F(g), with squared norm ∑xH∈G/H∥F(x)∥2. The left action is [Π(g)F](x)=F(g−1x). This is the published algebraic induced module with its invariant counting inner product.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite groups G,H, the Hilbert space V, and the unitary H-action σ.

[F1]

The algebraic induced module consists of the right-H-covariant functions F(gh)=σ(h)−1F(g) with left action [g⋅F](x)=F(g−1x) (The induced R-linear G-module Ind⁡HGW as H-covariant functions on G).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenF1construct

Counting measure is left and right invariant on a finite group, so both modular functions are 1 and ρ=1 satisfies the rho covariance. The finite quotient formula is the partition of a finite sum into cosets: ∑x∈Ga(x)=∑xH∈G/H∑h∈Ha(xh). Thus the quotient measure is counting measure, and the general covariance and left action reduce to [F1].

1.2givenF1

If x is replaced by xh0, then F(xh0)=σ(h0)−1F(x), so unitarity makes ∥F(xh0)∥=∥F(x)∥. The stated norm and inner product are therefore independent of coset representatives.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F1

Left multiplication permutes the finite set G/H, and [F1] shows it preserves the covariance law; reindexing the finite sum proves ∥Π(g)F∥=∥F∥. The covariant subspace is closed in the complete finite product VG, so completion adds no vectors. This is exactly the algebraic induced module with the stated invariant inner product. ∎

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

A homogeneous quotient without invariant measure

Statement

Assume AC. In the positive affine group G=R⋊R>0 with (b,a)(b′,a′)=(b+ab′,aa′), let H={(0,a):a>0}. Then G/H≅R has a quasi-invariant Radon measure class but no nonzero G-invariant Radon measure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the positive affine group and subgroup in the statement.

[F1]

Every LCH group admits a nonzero left Haar Radon measure (Existence of left and right Haar measures).

[F2]

Any two left Haar measures on an LCH group are positive scalar multiples (Uniqueness of left Haar measure up to scale).

[F3]

A nonnegative measurable density w defines a measure w dμ, with ∫f d(wμ)=∫fw dμ (The measure with density f relative to μ, Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product).

[F4]

The modular function is characterized by ∫f(xg−1) dμ(x)=ΔG(g)∫f dμ (Modular function of a locally compact group, Right translation scales left Haar measure).

[F5]

Every abelian LCH group is unimodular (Compact, discrete and abelian groups are unimodular).

[F6]

A nonzero invariant Radon measure on G/H exists exactly when ΔG∣H=ΔH (Criterion for an invariant quotient measure).

[F7]

A left Haar measure is a nonzero Radon measure, finite on compact sets and invariant under left translations (Left Haar integral and left Haar measure).

[F8]

Lebesgue measure on R2 is Radon under countable choice (Lebesgue measure is a Radon measure on R^n).

[A1]

AC is assumed as stated in the invariant-measure criterion (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]

AC implies countable choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1A1F1F2givenconstruct

The subgroup H={(0,a):a>0} is closed because it is the zero set of the continuous first-coordinate map, and it is a subgroup by the multiplication law. The map (b,a)↦b is continuous and constant on right H-cosets; its fibers are exactly those cosets, since (b,a)(0,t)=(b,at). It therefore descends to a continuous bijection qˉ:G/H→R. The inverse b↦(b,1)H is continuous as a composition of the continuous section b↦(b,1) with the quotient map, so qˉ is a homeomorphism. Under this identification the left action of (b0,a0) is T(x)=b0+a0x. Let m be a left Haar Radon measure on (R,+), supplied by [F1]. For each such T, the measure νT(E)=m(T−1E) on Borel sets is Radon because T is a homeomorphism. It is translation invariant: T−1(E+u)=T−1(E)+u/a0, so left invariance of m applies. Thus [F2] gives νT=cTm for some cT>0. Hence every group translate scales m by a positive finite constant, so its null sets are preserved and its Radon measure class is quasi-invariant.

2.1A1A2F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8step 1.1chooseconstruct

On the two-dimensional group manifold use the measure dμG(b,a)=a−2 db da, defined by the positive continuous density in [F3] relative to two-dimensional Lebesgue measure. By [A1, A2], AC supplies countable choice, so [F8] makes the base measure Radon; the density is bounded above on each compact set, so the weighted measure is locally finite and inherits regularity from the base measure. Left multiplication by (b0,a0) sends (b,a) to (b0+a0b,a0a) with Jacobian a02; substituting these coordinates gives a−2db da=(a0a)−2d(b0+a0b) d(a0a), so μG is left invariant. Therefore it is a left Haar measure by [F7]. For h=(0,t)∈H, right multiplication sends (b,a) to (b,at); with A=at, a−2db da=tA−2db dA, and hence ∫Gf(xh) dμG(x)=t∫Gf(x) dμG(x) for f∈Cc(G). Applying [F4] to h−1=(0,t−1) yields ΔG(0,t)=t−1. On the other hand [F5] gives ΔH(0,t)=1, since H is abelian. Taking any t≠1, the modular functions disagree on H; [F6] rules out every nonzero invariant Radon measure on G/H. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, Corollary B.1.7, PDF pp. 355–356. The invariant-measure criterion was checked against the full text; the affine-coordinate calculations are carried out directly here.

Sources