How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Induced Unitary Representations of Locally Compact Groups — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach Valued Integration and the Radon Nikodym Property
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Compact Lie Groups, Maximal Tori, and Peter–Weyl Theory
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Convergence: Nets and Filters
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Haar Measure Existence and Uniqueness
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Induced Representations, Frobenius Reciprocity and Applications
- Induced Unitary Representations of Locally Compact Groups
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Lie Groups, Invariant Fields, and the Exponential Map
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Modular Function and L1 Group Algebras
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Uniform Spaces: the Three Definitions
- Unitary Representations, Positive Type and GNS
- Urysohn's Lemma and the Tietze Extension Theorem
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples apply the quotient construction and conventions from the main page.
Induction from the trivial subgroup identifies with the left regular representation on . For a closed discrete cocompact subgroup, the finite invariant quotient measure removes the Radon–Nikodym cocycle and induction of the trivial representation is the quasi-regular action. When is finite, quotient integration is the finite coset sum and the completed model is exactly the algebraic covariant-function module with its counting inner product.
The positive affine group gives a contrasting case. Its quotient by the dilation subgroup is homeomorphic to , and a Haar measure class there is quasi-invariant under affine transformations. The explicit left Haar density gives , while the dilation subgroup is abelian and has modular function . The invariant-measure criterion therefore rules out a nonzero invariant Radon measure on this quotient.
The quotient-measure constructions in the trivial-subgroup and cocompact examples inherit the page’s explicit AC qualification. The affine counterexample also assumes AC for Haar/Radon suppliers and states the AC-to-countable-choice step needed to obtain Radon Lebesgue measure on the group manifold. The finite counting model is proved directly by a finite coset sum.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Induction from the trivial subgroup
Statement
Assume AC. For with its standard Haar measure of mass and the one-dimensional trivial representation, choose . Then , is left Haar measure, and is the left regular representation on , .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and an LCH group with a left Haar measure.
The closed-subgroup induction construction and action (Unitary induction from a closed subgroup).
The Weil formula and uniqueness of its quotient measure (Weil formula with a rho-function).
For the trivial subgroup the left regular representation acts by (Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group).
AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
When , the rho covariance imposes no restriction, and is valid. The averaging map is identity and the Weil formula becomes . Radon uniqueness [F2] identifies with left Haar measure.
Covariance is empty for the trivial subgroup, so the dense model is and its completion is . The density cocycle is , hence the induced action is , exactly [F3]. The construction theorem [F1] supplies strong continuity and unitarity. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Example E.1.8(i), PDF p. 414; Vogan, On the Definition of Induced Representations, §2. All relevant lines were inspected.
Uniform lattice quotient and quasi-regular action
Statement
Assume AC. If is a closed discrete cocompact subgroup of locally compact , then is unimodular, has a finite invariant Radon measure, and identifies with the quasi-regular action on without a cocycle.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, LCH , and closed discrete such that is compact.
The rho covariance law uses the stated modular convention (Rho-function for a closed subgroup).
A discrete group is unimodular (Compact, discrete and abelian groups are unimodular).
Every closed subgroup admits a rho-derived quasi-invariant Radon measure with density cocycle (Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes, Continuous quotient translation cocycle).
A nonzero -invariant quotient measure exists exactly when (Criterion for an invariant quotient measure).
The induced representation is unitary and its scalar covariant model is given by the induction theorem (Unitary induction from a closed subgroup).
AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Since is discrete, [F1] gives . The function obeys , so it is a rho-function by [F5]. Its cocycle is constant: .
Let be its quotient measure. Since is compact, : finiteness is Radon compact-finiteness and positivity follows from full support. The pushforward has the same total mass as , while [F2] gives . Therefore for every , and is unimodular.
Now , so [F3] gives a nonzero invariant Radon measure on ; compactness makes it finite. For its cocycle is identically one. Scalar covariance says , so sections are exactly functions on , and the action is with the quotient norm. This is the quasi-regular representation, as claimed by [F4]. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1 and Appendix E §E.1, Proposition B.1.6 and Example E.1.8(ii), PDF pp. 355–356 and 414. Full relevant text was inspected.
Finite-group counting model for induction
Example
Let be finite, , and let be a unitary representation on a complex Hilbert space . Give both groups counting measure and take . The induced Hilbert space consists of functions satisfying , with squared norm . The left action is . This is the published algebraic induced module with its invariant counting inner product.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite groups , the Hilbert space , and the unitary -action .
The algebraic induced module consists of the right--covariant functions with left action (The induced -linear -module as -covariant functions on ).
Verification
Counting measure is left and right invariant on a finite group, so both modular functions are and satisfies the rho covariance. The finite quotient formula is the partition of a finite sum into cosets: . Thus the quotient measure is counting measure, and the general covariance and left action reduce to [F1].
If is replaced by , then , so unitarity makes . The stated norm and inner product are therefore independent of coset representatives.
Left multiplication permutes the finite set , and [F1] shows it preserves the covariance law; reindexing the finite sum proves . The covariant subspace is closed in the complete finite product , so completion adds no vectors. This is exactly the algebraic induced module with the stated invariant inner product. ∎
A homogeneous quotient without invariant measure
Statement
Assume AC. In the positive affine group with , let . Then has a quasi-invariant Radon measure class but no nonzero -invariant Radon measure.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and the positive affine group and subgroup in the statement.
Every LCH group admits a nonzero left Haar Radon measure (Existence of left and right Haar measures).
Any two left Haar measures on an LCH group are positive scalar multiples (Uniqueness of left Haar measure up to scale).
A nonnegative measurable density defines a measure , with (The measure with density relative to , Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product).
The modular function is characterized by (Modular function of a locally compact group, Right translation scales left Haar measure).
Every abelian LCH group is unimodular (Compact, discrete and abelian groups are unimodular).
A nonzero invariant Radon measure on exists exactly when (Criterion for an invariant quotient measure).
A left Haar measure is a nonzero Radon measure, finite on compact sets and invariant under left translations (Left Haar integral and left Haar measure).
Lebesgue measure on is Radon under countable choice (Lebesgue measure is a Radon measure on R^n).
AC is assumed as stated in the invariant-measure criterion (The Axiom of Choice).
AC implies countable choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice).
Counterexample
The subgroup is closed because it is the zero set of the continuous first-coordinate map, and it is a subgroup by the multiplication law. The map is continuous and constant on right -cosets; its fibers are exactly those cosets, since . It therefore descends to a continuous bijection . The inverse is continuous as a composition of the continuous section with the quotient map, so is a homeomorphism. Under this identification the left action of is . Let be a left Haar Radon measure on , supplied by [F1]. For each such , the measure on Borel sets is Radon because is a homeomorphism. It is translation invariant: , so left invariance of applies. Thus [F2] gives for some . Hence every group translate scales by a positive finite constant, so its null sets are preserved and its Radon measure class is quasi-invariant.
On the two-dimensional group manifold use the measure , defined by the positive continuous density in [F3] relative to two-dimensional Lebesgue measure. By [A1, A2], AC supplies countable choice, so [F8] makes the base measure Radon; the density is bounded above on each compact set, so the weighted measure is locally finite and inherits regularity from the base measure. Left multiplication by sends to with Jacobian ; substituting these coordinates gives , so is left invariant. Therefore it is a left Haar measure by [F7]. For , right multiplication sends to ; with , , and hence for . Applying [F4] to yields . On the other hand [F5] gives , since is abelian. Taking any , the modular functions disagree on ; [F6] rules out every nonzero invariant Radon measure on . ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, Corollary B.1.7, PDF pp. 355–356. The invariant-measure criterion was checked against the full text; the affine-coordinate calculations are carried out directly here.